Firewalls: UDP port significance

Firewalls
(February 1995)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	UDP port significance
From:	sotiris . baxevanis @ intelsat . int
Date:	13 Feb 95 11:18:04 -0500
To:	firewalls @ greatcircle . com
Original-encoded-information-types:	IA5-Text
P1-content-type:	P2
P1-message-id:	USMCIINTELSAT;c\mhsgw\950213111804a
P1-recipient:	firewalls%greatcircle . com @ news
Reply-to:	sotiris . baxevanis @ intelsat . int
Ua-content-id:	UDP port signifi
X400-trace:	USMCIINTELSAT; arrival 950213111804-0500 deferred 950213111804-0500 action Relayed

Hello, lately I have noticed connection attempts to the folloing UDP ports 

33439, 33440, 33501-03, 33459-61, 33465-67, 33474-76, 36870, 36895, 49546-48

anything significant about these ports?

thanks

Follow-Ups:

Re: UDP port significance
From: Oliver Friedrichs <iceman @ MBnet . MB . CA>
Re: UDP port significance
From: William Gianopoulos {84718} <wag @ swl . msd . ray . com>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	re: SUMMARY: 'smart cards' From: kdante @ nsf . gov
Indexed By Date	Next:	Re: X anyone ? "McMullen, Michael K." From: Ken Hardy <ken @ bridge . com>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: SUMMARY: 'smart cards' From: Stephen . L . Arnold @ Arnold . Com
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: UDP port significance From: William Gianopoulos {84718} <wag @ swl . msd . ray . com>