Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(February 1995)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: reuse of already assigned IP addresses
From: bmanning @ ISI . EDU
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 1995 04:37:06 -0800 (PST)
To: hal @ seta . com (Hal L. Feinstein)
Cc: firewalls @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <9502202250 . AA29709 @ seta . com> from "Hal L. Feinstein" at Feb 20, 95 05:50:16 pm
Posted-date: Tue, 21 Feb 1995 04:37:06 -0800 (PST)

> Several postings suggest this is a valid practice.  
> Breaking the IP layer into uncoordinated domains is ok?  
> 
> So whats the group consensus here. Is it ok to reuse assigned IP
> or is it bad engineering?  

A brief review of RFC 1597 and RFC 1627 should answer these questions 
for you.

>From the Index:

1597 Address Allocation for Private Internets. Y. Rekhter, B.
     Moskowitz, D. Karrenberg & G. de Groot. March 1994. (Format:
     TXT=17430 bytes)
1627 Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be
     Codified). E. Lear, E. Fair, D. Crocker & T. Kessler. June 1994.
     (Format: TXT=18823 bytes)
-- 
--bill


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Firewall gateway's resources ..
From: "Ian C. Blenke" <blenke @ suntan . eng . usf . edu>
Next: Summary: There can only be one!
From: Ed Strong <ems @ ccrl . nj . nec . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: reuse of already assigned IP addresses
From: Stephen . L . Arnold @ Arnold . Com
Next: Re: reuse of already assigned IP addresses
From: thierry agassis <thierry @ osftag . geo . dec . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com