Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(March 1995)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Firewall-to-Firewall Encryption
From: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr @ tis . com>
Organization: Trusted Information Systems, Inc. Glenwood, MD
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 1995 11:11:22 -0500 (EST)
To: william . wells @ damark . com (william.wells)
Cc: firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
Coredump: Infocalypse Now!!!
In-reply-to: <9503011507 . AA11103 @ damark . com> from "william.wells" at Mar 1, 95 09:08:00 am
Phone: 301-854-6889

william.wells writes:
>Careful here.  In my conversations with various vendors, it is not certain
>that firewall-to-firewall encryption, as currently designed, will work
>between different vendors of firewalls.

	There are 2 issues here. One is key management and the other
is protocol and encryption algorithms. I suspect that most vendors
who are doing firewall to firewall crypto are basing their work on
the draft standards IETF is working towards. So, any standard-track
firewall crypto should interoperate just fine. The other guys will
lose. :)
	Key management is another problem, but as long as you can
exchange keys in a manner that lets your firewalls interoperate
using a standard packet format then you're OK.

mjr.


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Firewall-to-Firewall Encryption
From: mckenney @ smiley . mitre . org (Brian W. McKenney)
Next: Re: Firewall-to-Firewall Encryption
From: Larry Chin <Larry_Chin @ ca . cch . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Firewall-to-Firewall Encryption
From: "william.wells" <william . wells @ damark . com>
Next: Re: Firewall-to-Firewall Encryption
From: mckenney @ smiley . mitre . org (Brian W. McKenney)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com