Firewalls: Re: Firewall-to-Firewall Encryption

Firewalls
(March 1995)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: Firewall-to-Firewall Encryption
From:	Larry Chin <Larry_Chin @ ca . cch . com>
Date:	Wed, 1 Mar 1995 11:50:22 -0500
To:	mckenney @ smiley . mitre . org
Cc:	firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM

>> > I am looking for information on commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) encryption
>> > products that can be used to provide firewall-to-firewall encryption
>> > (node-to-node).  The device would encrypt based on source/destination
>> > address and if possible by network service (port).  

You could check out LanGuardian from UUNET. It encrypts data outbound
based on destination, the caveat being that the destination must also
have a LanGuardian machine



Wed Mar  1 11:50:08 EST 1995
===========================================================================
Larry Chin {Larry_Chin @
 ca .
 cch .
 com}	System/Network Administrator
CCH Canadian Ltd.			(416) 441-4001 ext. 349	
===========================================================================

Abstainer, n.:
	A weak person who yields to the temptation of denying himself a
pleasure.
		-- Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Re: Firewall-to-Firewall Encryption From: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr @ tis . com>
Indexed By Date	Next:	Re: Node based security (Was: Re: No Out-Of-The-Box Security) From: reynolds @ acetsw . amat . com (John Reynolds)
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: Firewall-to-Firewall Encryption From: mckenney @ smiley . mitre . org (Brian W. McKenney)
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Node based security (Was: Re: No Out-Of-The-Box Security) From: horn @ mickey . jsc . nasa . gov