Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(March 1995)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: FW-1, etc.
From: David Miller <isdmill @ gatekeeper . ddp . state . me . us>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 1995 09:31:23 -0500 (EST)
To: "Samuel D. Jones" <sjones @ Aptech . com>
Cc: Firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <9503020012 . AA07178 @ amos . Aptech . com>

On Wed, 1 Mar 1995, Samuel D. Jones wrote:

> >> If you are serious (and IMNSHO you can't be too serious if you are 
> >> considering FW-1) about security I'd look at:
> >> 
> >> 	SCC's Sidewinder	~ $40K
> >> 	DEC's SEAL		~ $35K (I think)
> >> 	Raptor's Eagle		~ $25K
> >> 	TIS's Gauntlet		~ $15K
> >
> >	Smallworks NetGate	~ $5k (for source!)
> >
> >> My opinion is that the best value lies in the bottom two. 
> >
> >And how.
> 
> What makes these better than FW-1? Just asking, I have no argument
> with this, I just don't know.

FW-1 is a fancy packet filter.  The others are firewalls with application 
proxies and the like.  Perhaps others here feel a packet filter mechanism 
can be a firewall and provide real security, but I don't:)

--- David
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
		It's *amazing* what one can accomplish when 
		    one doesn't know what one can't do!



Follow-Ups:
References:
  • FW-1, etc.
    From: sjones @ Aptech . com (Samuel D. Jones)
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: FW-1, etc.
From: Richard Voorintholt <richard @ cvi . ns . nl>
Next: Re: FW-1, etc.
From: Rick Romkey <pokey @ maddie . atlantic . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: FW-1, etc.
From: sjones @ Aptech . com (Samuel D. Jones)
Next: Re: FW-1, etc.
From: Ed Strong <ems @ ccrl . nj . nec . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com