Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(March 1995)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Sendmail bug
From: peter @ aodc . gov . au (Peter Edward Voss)
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 1995 10:39:37 --1000
To: nsayer @ quack . kfu . com
Cc: firewalls @ greatcircle . com

> From firewalls-owner @
 GreatCircle .
 COM Fri Mar  3 08:57 EST 1995
> From: nsayer @
 quack .
 kfu .
 com (Nick Sayer)
 
> I wrote:
> 
> >Solaris 1.x contains SunOS 4.x. That is, Solaris 1.0 contains SunOS
> >4.1, Solaris 1.0.1 contains SunOS 4.1.1. Solaris 1.1 contains SunOS
> >4.1.2, Solaris 1.1.1 contains SunOS 4.1.3, Solaris 1.1.1B contains
> >SunOS 4.1.3_U1, and Solairs 1.1.2 contains SunOS 4.1.4.
> 
> I've been corrected and re-checked the CDs, and sure enough,
> 
> Solaris 1.0.1 contains SunOS 4.1.2
> Solaris 1.1   contains SunOS 4.1.3
> Solaris 1.1.1 contains SunOS 4.1.3_U1 (there was a rev A and B of both)
> Solaris 1.1.2 contains SunOS 4.1.4
> 
> Axil and Ross were also distributing an unofficial 1.1.1B_H containing
> SunOS 4.1.3_U1_H, which was patched to accept the 50 and 66 MHz
> Hypersparc CPU modules. It was just 1.1.1B (which you applied with a
> Supersparc module installed) and a patch CD you applied before
> installing the new CPUs.
> 
> No rev of Solaris was made available for sun3. SunOS 4.1.1_U1 was the
> last sun3 release (which was just 4.1.1 with some patches).
> 
> Solaris 2.4 will be the last release for the really old sparc machines as well
> as the sun4e karch.
> 
Yep, my original point that the CERT advisory was unclear seems to hold...... Also,
it would seem for a good time for SUN to sync. their Revision identifiers with
each product, ie. SOLARIS / SUNOS, as they are obviously related (subset) 


> But now we're veering seriously off topic.

Maybe comp.sun.sources.confusing would be better <g> 

#include standard.disclaimer
"I said it for me "

Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Security on the I-Way
From: John Adams <jna @ concorde . com>
Next: Re: Out of the box "security" was: Dual homed VAXen.....
From: John Adams <jna @ concorde . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Sendmail bug
From: nsayer @ quack . kfu . com (Nick Sayer)
Next: Re: Firewalls replying with ICMP packets.
From: nsayer @ quack . kfu . com (Nick Sayer)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com