Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(March 1995)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re[2]: Microsoft SMTP Gateway
From: brian @ ilinx . ilinx . com (Brian J. Murrell)
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 1995 18:02:10 -0800 (PST)
To: mikenel @ netcom . com
Cc: matt @ uts . EDU . AU, BAIM @ itg . viacom . com, firewalls @ greatcircle . com

from the quill of Michael Nelson <mikenel @
 netcom .
 com> on scroll
<Pine .
 SUN .
 3 .
 91 .
 950331135901 .
 6171D-100000 @
 netcom23>
> On Sat, 1 Apr 1995, Jas wrote:
> 
> > well if its anything like microsoft's own mail gateway expect about
> > 20% mail lossage (these are recent figures i have got mailing a friend
> > in microsoft).
> 
> Microsoft does not use MS-Mail PO's for mail handling. A bunch of Xenix 
> machines serve as their "mail backbone".

Really makes you want to run out and buy some MS-Mail huh??  MS seems to
have lot's of confidence in it's mail products.  :-)

b.

--
Brian J. Murrell                                               brian @
 ilinx .
 com
InterLinx Support Services, Inc.                              brian @
 wimsey .
 com
North Vancouver, B.C.                                             604 983 UNIX
        Platform and Brand Independent UNIX Support - R3.2 - R4 - BSD


Indexed By Date Previous: Re: A "real" security expert
From: bonomi @ delta . eecs . nwu . edu (Robert Bonomi)
Next: Re: protecting username/password across the unsecure net
From: Jim Thompson <jim @ Tadpole . COM>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Microsoft SMTP Gateway
From: "Mark Norris" <mark @ uunet . uu . net>
Next: Tokens
From: padgett @ tccslr . dnet . mmc . com (A. Padgett Peterson, P.E. Information Security)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com