Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(April 1995)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: E-mail virus scanning
From: padgett @ tccslr . dnet . mmc . com (A. Padgett Peterson, P.E. Information Security)
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 95 09:22:32 -0400
To: "firewalls @ greatcircle . com"@UVS1.dnet.mmc.com

>> Theoretically shouldn't it be possible to scan all email at the gateway for a 
>> virus inside a mail message? 

>This scan will fail when internal users are using PGP, PEM, or 
>some other encrypted mail protocol.  

Again the problem is a faulty paradigm. Choose what can be done. You cannot
(or only in rare instances) prove a negative ("This E-Mail does NOT contain
a virus"). You can prove a positive if you take care ("This E-Mail contains
ONLY English text"). Pass "text only" and you have most likely reduced the 
E-Mail requiring a decision to a manageable level.

Over the years I have solved a number of "insovable" problems using this 
technique of "divide and separate" until all that is left are solvable ones
(and often just a single mucky one 8*).

The problem is that such a decision matrix does not follow a nice simple
tree structure such as professors love, if anything it usually looks like
a tree standing on its point - single entry, multiple exits, and no two
paths the same length. CASE statements at the start help.

					Warmly,
						Padgett

Indexed By Date Previous: Firewalls & "other" protocols...
From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
Next: Ciscos and port logging revisited
From: lafko @ ici . com (David A. Lafko)
Indexed By Thread Previous: E-Mail Virus Scanning
From: padgett @ tccslr . dnet . mmc . com (A. Padgett Peterson, P.E. Information Security)
Next: systems testing & quality assurance techniques
From: fc @ all . net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com