Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(June 1995)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Vendor Lines
From: Mike Figg <figg @ pencom . com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 95 16:55:33 -0500
To: Firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM

I am posting late to this discussion, but I wanted to point out an article  
that I saw in the March 13 edition of Network World, titled "Ford testing a  
'private Internet' to link suppliers".  This article described a high speed  
(4Mbps SMDS) IP net managed by Ameritech Corp., linking Ford and some of  
its suppliers.  This net is intended to replace existing EDI-based Value  
Added Networks.  One current vendor of EDI-based VANs mentioned in the  
article is GE Information Services.

One phrase used to describe this network was "virtual private network",  
which coincidentally is the same phrase used by several current firewall  
vendors to describe the kind of networks created using their products with  
end-to-end encryption.  It appears that one feature that distinguishes this  
private network from the end-to-end encryption products is that it doesn't  
depend on the performance problems of public Internet providers.

The most interesting part of this article was that the only mention of  
network security was a reference to the fact that since this private used  
static routing and was therefore more secure than the public Internet.  In  
particular, no mention was made about any kind of security or firewalls  
needed or wanted between companies on this private network.  Of course,  
since the details of this setup were filtered through whoever wrote the  
article, there is no telling if what if any security considerations went to  
the network design.

If anyone on the list has more insight into this I would like to hear it.

Thanks,
Mike
===============================================================
Michael Figg                    Pencom Software
figg @
 pencom .
 com                 9050 Capital of Texas Hwy North
(512)343-6666                   Austin, Texas 78759


Follow-Ups:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Making Firewalls a newsgroup?
From: Quentin Fennessy <Quentin . Fennessy @ SEMATECH . Org>
Next: Re: IP packet filtering...the non-obvious fix
From: pst @ cisco . com (Paul Traina)
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Vendor Lines
From: bobk @ manzanita . DEV . 3Com . COM (Bob Konigsberg)
Next: Re: Vendor Lines
From: Michael Richardson <mcr @ milkyway . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com