Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(June 1995)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re:Why?
From: root @ trumpet . turner . com
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 1995 18:15:46 -0400
To: Firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM

 In response to David A. Martinez question as to why flames
 are hurled in a newsgroup, there can be several answers to
 this question:
 
 1.  A "flame" is not always to degrade an individual but to
 explain an improper response so that others may not make
 the same mistake.
 
 2.  The subject may have been discussed in detail in prior
 messages (see answer 1).
 
 3.  The "flamer" may be attempting to make a point that
 the "flamee" did not do adequate research before replying
 to a question or that the question was not appropriate to
 deserve a respones (see answer 1).
 
 4.  The "flamer" has an inflated ego and wants to feel
 superior to the "flamee" and wants to fuel his ego (this
 occurs the majority of the time).
 
 5. Or lastly, they've missed their group therapy sessions,
 skipped the daily dose of "Prozac" and this is the only
 way they have to vent their frustrations:)

 I must agree with you though, there would be a lot more
 useful information provided if the "flamers" would ignite
 their lighters in a private email message.
 
 NO FLAMES PLEASE:)
 
 
 Todd A. Hudspeth
 Corporate Systems Security
 Manager
 
 Worldwide Information Technology Services
 Turner Broadcasting System, Inc.
 
 todd .
 hudspeth @
 turner .
 com
 


Indexed By Date Previous: Has anyone evaluated Black Hole?
From: Tony Catania <Tony_Catania @ Broadview . com>
Next: intelligent/"stateful" packet filter weaknesses
From: Peter Couvares <pfcouvar @ amhux3 . amherst . edu>
Indexed By Thread Previous: RE: Why?
From: Ed Woodrick <Ed_Woodrick @ msn . com>
Next: Livingston Firewall IRX Router
From: Dean Waters <dwaters @ RedBrick . COM>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com