Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(September 1995)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: linux vs. *bsd for secure networking system
From: Karl Strickland <karl @ bagpuss . demon . co . uk>
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 1995 02:30:38 +0100 (BST)
To: Paul McMahan <mcmahan @ cs . utk . edu>
Cc: firewalls @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <199509012356 . TAA11927 @ rudolph . cs . utk . edu> from "Paul McMahan" at Sep 1, 95 07:56:54 pm

> Hello,
> 
> I know that the linux vs. (free|net)bsd question is the subject of
> ongoing debates outside the realm of firewalls, but I'm interested
> specifically in the security aspects of these operating systems.

Remember, if you go for Linux, you have to decide *which* linux to go for -
there are at least 7 different distributions - some of which are very
different.  And then, when a hole is discovered, you have to find patches
that work with your obscure distribution & version.

FreeBSD has controlled releases, and is developed in a controlled, structured
manner; all security-related changes to the system must undergo peer review
before a commit is made.

This alone would put FreeBSD higher up my list.
-- 
------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------
Mailed using ELM on FreeBSD               |                    Karl Strickland
PGP 2.3a Public Key Available.            | Internet: karl @
 bagpuss .
 demon .
 co .
 uk
                                          |


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Frame-Relay Net Connections
From: paul @ hawksbill . sprintmrn . com (Paul Ferguson)
Next: Undeliverable Mail
From: "NY Global UNIX GW" <NY_Global_UNIX_GW . NY_Global_UNIX_GW%macmail @ jpmorgan . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: linux vs. *bsd for secure networking system
From: Paul McMahan <mcmahan @ cs . utk . edu>
Next: Re: linux vs. *bsd for secure networking system
From: "Marius" <Marius @ doulosgeri . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com