Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(September 1995)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Secure version of Sendmail
From: James_Dehnert @ optilink . optilink . dsccc . com
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 95 08:42 PDT
To: firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: jgt10 @ amdahl . com (John G. Thompson) "Re: Secure version of Sendmail" (Sep 13, 9:48pm)
References: <m0st58V-0003oMC @ sousa . amdahl . com>

On Sep 13,  9:48pm, John G. Thompson wrote:
> Subject: Re: Secure version of Sendmail
> > ..Sendmail is the only useful mail package out there out there. I'd be
happy
> > to adopt anything which offers me Sendmail functionality in a more secure
> > fashion....
>
> Have you honestly looked at smail?
>
> JGT
>

  Here here!  I use smail on all our machines.  My basic config file is about
10 lines long. I have it up to 20 to do things a bit more uniformly but 10
lines does all I need.

  The way I look at it, the easier it is to configure, the less chance your
going to screw it up.  It has also passed all the tests I have given it based
on known sendmail problems.




-- 
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=++=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
= James "Zeke" Dehnert             Zeke_Dehnert @
 optilink .
 dsccc .
 com =
+ Unix Network Administrator                        (707) 792-7000 +
= DSC Access Products Div.                     Petaluma California =
+ The opinions represented herein are not necessarily those of DSC +
=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+==+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=


Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Secure version of Sendmail
From: mdr @ vodka . sse . att . com
Next: WWW - http - cgi_scripts
From: Stefan Thatcher <jst10 @ octacon . co . uk>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Secure version of Sendmail
From: Rick Smith <smith @ sctc . com>
Next: Re: Secure version of Sendmail
From: chk @ psa . pencom . com (Christian Kuhtz)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com