Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(September 1995)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Re[2]: FireWall software.....who's the best??
From: paul @ hawksbill . sprintmrn . com (Paul Ferguson)
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 1995 16:21:47 -0500 (EST)
To: mulligan @ incog . com
Cc: frankw @ in . net, brian @ ilinx . bctel . net, firewalls @ GreatCircle . com
In-reply-to: <9509221713 . AA04398 @ future . incog . com> from "mulligan @ future . incog . com" at Sep 22, 95 11:13:52 am

> 
> Frank wrote:
> > I used packet filtering gateways often at a previous company and
> > know their capabilities rather well.
> 
> Maybe Frank you ought to take a new look at packet screens.  What you
> may have used at a previous company is not what is available today.  A
> packet screen of old is not the same as a stateful packet screen of new.
> They are two very different technologies.
> 
> Stateful Packet Screens can provide the functionality of application
> relays with better scalability and better security.
> 
> 	geoff
> 

Quite frankly, there are many of us that prefer packet filtering.
Application gateways can sometimes be rather ugly.  :-)

- paul




Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Token Ring Firewalls?
From: chk @ psa . pencom . com (Christian Kuhtz)
Next: Socks compilation.
From: Francis Hartojo <yhartojo @ blackhole . eas . asu . edu>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Re[2]: FireWall software.....who's the best??
From: mulligan @ future . incog . com
Next: Re: Re[2]: FireWall software.....who's the best??
From: chk @ psa . pencom . com (Christian Kuhtz)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com