Firewalls: Re: FW to FW FTP w/ no port

Firewalls
(October 1995)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: FW to FW FTP w/ no port > 1023
From:	peter @ nmti . com (Peter da Silva)
Date:	Tue, 3 Oct 1995 20:04:28 -0500 (CDT)
To:	sgcccdc @ citec . qld . gov . au (Colin Campbell)
Cc:	wbunting @ ch . inri . com, firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to:	<9510022336 . AA14998 @ citecub . citec . qld . gov . au> from "Colin Campbell" at Oct 3, 95 09:36:16 am

> > 3. Do not use FTP and write a TCP application that uses only a single TCP
> > port for data and control.  Issues: Time + $$ no compatibility. Benefit:
> > solves the problem.

FSP and HTTP are both candidates for this application. And they've already
been written. NNTP would work as well, and can be proxied with a simple
plug gateway.

References:

Re: FW to FW FTP w/ no port > 1023
From: sgcccdc @ citec . qld . gov . au (Colin Campbell)

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Re: Mail Proxy From: mdr @ vodka . sse . att . com
Indexed By Date	Next:	re: Encryption strength From: frankw @ in . net (Frank Willoughby)
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: FW to FW FTP w/ no port > 1023 From: sgcccdc @ citec . qld . gov . au (Colin Campbell)
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: FW to FW FTP w/ no port > 1023 From: peter @ nmti . com (Peter da Silva)