Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(October 1995)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: FWTK, is it secure
From: Frederick M Avolio <avolio @ TIS . COM>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 95 09:30:43 -0400
To: gary flynn <gary @ habanero . jmu . edu>
Cc: firewalls @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 18 Oct 95 08:54:51 -0400. <199510181257 . FAA23855 @ miles . greatcircle . com>

> Can someone explain the operation of a transparent proxy? I thought either
> the application had to be modified (i.e. made proxy aware) or an interim 
> step of connecting directly to the firewall was necessary for all 
> application firewalls.

Some firewall products -- such as the Gauntlet Internet Firewall --
support transparency through the firewall (usually as part of an
optional set-up). This means usually and typically exactly what it
says. Internal hosts and client software and users interact -- for all
supported services -- as if the firewall was not there. In the case of
the Gauntlet Internet Firewall, The firewall *looks* like it is acting
as a router (or packet screen), but in fact the firewall is
intercepting the connection request and firing up the appropriate
application gateway program.

Fred


Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Budget Time / Firewall Scare/ Looking for Numbers
From: russo @ interramp . com (Bob Russo)
Next: RE: Brewer et al. on ``Basic Flaws in Internet Security and
From: peterson @ minerva . westboro-ma . peritus . com (David Peterson)
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: FWTK, is it secure
From: gary flynn <gary @ habanero . jmu . edu>
Next: Re: FWTK, is it secure
From: mcr @ milkyway . com (Michael Richardson)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com