Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(October 1995)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: RE: response to questions regarding Rapt
From: dcarter @ inmar-inc . com (Carter, David)
Organization: Inmar Enterprises Inc., Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27102 USA
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 1995 12:36:31 -0500
To: akirby @ raptor . com (Alan Kirby), Firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM (Firewalls)
Cc: brian . brizendine @ inmar-inc . com (Brizendine, Brian), doug . bordner @ inmar-inc . com (Bordner, Doug), dave . kutlenios @ cms . inmar-inc . com (Kutlenios, Dave)

Can someone please expound on the "Raptor-supplied tools to pass mail"   
mentioned in this post? We use Raptor's Eagle, but run the HP-supplied   
sendmail version on the firewall, and it forwards to our internal mail   
gateway. How big a risk does this pose? Can anyone tell me where to find   
compiled binaries (for HP/UX 9.x) of the most current sendmail?

Thanks for any & all enlightenment!

 ----------
From:  Alan Kirby[SMTP:akirby @
 raptor .
 com]
Sent:  Thursday, October 26, 1995 7:13 PM
To:  Firewalls
Subject:  response to questions regarding Raptor

Sender: firewalls-owner @
 GreatCircle .
 COM
Precedence: bulk

This is in response to an October 24 posting to the Firewalls mailing   
list.
The individual who posted the question is evaluating a Raptor firewall,   
and
posed a question to this community regarding any known security   
weaknesses
in the Raptor system.

In response to that posting, there was a question raised specifically   
about
the use of an outdated version of Sendmail to pass mail through the   
firewall.

There are widely known bugs in older versions of Sendmail. In fact,   
Raptor
recommends to its customers to use Raptor supplied tools to pass mail   
rather
than Sendmail. If Sendmail is to be used to pass mail, Raptor recommends   
to
our customers that they install the latest version (Version 8.7.1) which
addresses known bugs.

Raptor takes any potential problem very seriously. Over the past 48   
hours,
Raptor has given this the highest possible priority. Our technical   
support
organization has aggressively pursued every available channel of   
information
to attempt to substantiate the rumor.  We have been unable to do so.  To   
our
knowledge, there are no substantiated reports by users of any break-ins   
due
to architectural deficiencies or bugs in the Raptor product.

If anyone IS aware of information to the contrary, Raptor is extremely
interested in uncovering any problem.  We will respond to any such   
problem
immediately.

Alan Kirby,
VP Engineering




 ---
D. David Carter, Director of Systems Architecture
Inmar Enterprises, Inc., Winston-Salem, NC
dcarter @
 inmar-inc .
 com


Indexed By Date Previous: Re: RE: NT Firewall
From: jim @ SmallWorks . COM (Jim Thompson)
Next: RE: response to questions regarding Rapt
From: akirby @ raptor . com (Alan Kirby)
Indexed By Thread Previous: RE: New tool available: Netcat
From: "Antonio Vasconcelos" <antonio_vasconcelos @ q950 . bvl . pt>
Next: RE: response to questions regarding Rapt
From: akirby @ raptor . com (Alan Kirby)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com