Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(January 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Type enforcement vs chroot and buffers
From: Jas (Matthew K) <matt @ lordmuck . itd . uts . edu . au>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 1995 16:52:18 +1100 (EST)
To: mrm @ alpharel . com (Mike Murphy)
Cc: firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM, smith @ sctc . com
In-reply-to: <199512072351 . PAA24540 @ visalia . optigfx . com> from "Mike Murphy" at Dec 7, 95 03:51:25 pm

Mike Murphy wrote this...

[...]

> and followed, chroot works. A lot of "if's", sad to say. And too
> bad sockets weren't in filespace.

[...]

well in SVR4 sockets are in the filespace (via /dev/tcp, /dev/udp, and
libsocket)

			Matt
-- 
#!/bin/sh
echo '16i[q]sa[ln0=aln100%Pln100/snlbx]sbA0D3F204445524F42snlbxq'|dc;exit
Matthew Keenan   Systems Programmer   Information Technology Division
      University of Technology     Sydney Australia

It's nice to be in a position where people apologize because they
assume there's humor in your work, based on past experience,
but they're not sure where it is. -- Rob Pike


Follow-Ups:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Security managing Cisco Routers
From: Craig McLellan <mclelcl @ onto . network . com>
Next: Firewalls needed for both dial-in AND dial-out
From: /G=BECKY/S=HEROLD @ mhs-pfg1 . attmail . com
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Security managing Cisco Routers
From: JOSE LUIS VERDEGUER NAVARRO <a01056 @ eps . ua . es>
Next: Re: Type enforcement vs chroot and buffers
From: peter @ nmti . com (Peter da Silva)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com