Other Indexes

• Previous month (January 1996)
• Next month (March 1996)
• This month, indexed by thread

• Thursday 29 February 1996
  • Re: Linux Disadvantages (Edited Question) (fwd)
    From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <m1jmb00 @ FRB . GOV>
  • Re: VPN's over the internet
    From: Wayne . Gifford @ East . Sun . COM (Wayne Gifford - Internet Commerce Group)
  • Support of already used IP adresses
    From: Marc Rapoport <rapoport @ iway . fr>
  • Re: Proxy-server for AOL client???
    From: peter @ nmti . com (Peter da Silva)
  • rx but no tx wiring for ethernet
    From: Tim Keanini <blast @ crl . com>
  • Eternal war: gateway vs filtering
    From: security @ crpht . lu (Bruno MAMER)
  • Checkpoint ops
    From: smcc @ pipeline . com (System Management Consulting Company)
  • Re: Linux Disadvantages
    From: Jon Freivald <jaf @ devildog . liii . com>
  • RE: VPN's over the internet
    From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
  • Re: Subject: Firewall-1-v1.2.1 & OSPF
    From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
  • Re: Firewalls-Digest V5 #129
    From: Chris Pugrud <cpugrud @ primenet . com>
  • Re: Pentagon displays due respect for hackers
    From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
  • SQL Proxy
    From: Adam Safier <asafier @ explorer . csc . com>
  • catastrophe logs
    From: John Rauser <jmr @ winternet . com>
• Wednesday 28 February 1996
  • Re: Pentagon displays due respect for hackers
    From: Colin Campbell <sgcccdc @ citec . qld . gov . au>
  • Re: Logs: list
    From: vbaca @ Coded . COM (Virginia L. Baca)
  • Re: CERN Proxy (WHERE?)
    From: "Mark Horn [ Net Ops ]" <mhorn @ funb . com>
  • PC/Lynx into a Router
    From: Joseph Seanor <cibir @ netcom . com>
  • Re: Linux Disadvantages
    From: Can BAYSAL <baysalc @ boun . edu . tr>
  • Re: Proxy-server for AOL client???
    From: Perry The Cynic <perry @ sutr . cynic . org>
  • Re: Pentagon displays due respect for hackers
    From: Darrell Fuhriman <darrell @ teleport . com>
  • Re: VPN's over the internet
    From: Adam Safier <asafier @ explorer . csc . com>
  • Re: Subject: Firewall-1-v1.2.1 & OSPF
    From: John Hopkins <hopkins @ icrf . icnet . uk>
  • Re: Logs: list
    From: Adam Safier <asafier @ explorer . csc . com>
  • extremely serious holes in JavaScript
    From: Nasaron Wimolniti <naz @ netcom . com>
  • Re: What port does NT use for logins?
    From: Charles_Ragan @ INS . COM (Charles Ragan)
  • Spam from serve.com
    From: Andrew Auderieth <andrew @ mail . serve . com>
  • Fear, Uncertainty & Doubt
    From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
  • Unsecure passwords
    From: Pangeia <pangeia @ cdsid . com . br>
  • Re: Sniffer for Windows NT.
    From: ren @ alpo . casc . com (Ren Yonghong)
  • Re: Network Tools
    From: rebowes @ tasc . com (Bob Bowes)
  • Re: What port does NT use for logins?
    From: Ken Hardy <ken @ bridge . com>
  • Re: Sniffer for Windows NT.
    From: "Joseph L. Moll" <jmoll @ acquion . com>
  • Re: Truth is stranger than fiction
    From: "Jim Meritt" <jmeritt @ smtpinet . aspensys . com>
  • Re: Pentagon pays due respect ...
    From: Sick Puppy <sikpuppy @ maestro . com>
  • Re: version HTTP CERN for sco
    From: shishir+email @ ftp . com
  • RE: VPN's over the internet
    From: John Weakly <weaklyj @ usasoc . soc . mil>
  • Sniffer for Windows NT.
    From: "SATEESHB" <SATEESHB @ inf . com>
  • Two questions
    From: Claudio Telmon <claudio @ DI . Unipi . IT>
  • Re: SAProuter
    From: zuber @ berlin . snafu . de (Gerhard Zuber)
  • Re: Subject: Firewall-1-v1.2.1 & OSPF
    From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
  • 3Com Routers
    From: Rafael Portillo <rafa @ uap . edu . ph>
  • RE: Proxy-server for AOL client???
    From: Alex Chircop <alex . j . chircop @ magnet . mt>
  • Re: Pentagon displays due respect for hackers
    From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
  • Re: Subject: Firewall-1-v1.2.1 & OSPF
    From: srzpem @ swissre . ch (Martin Peter)
  • A repost: NT Firewalls
    From: pmoen @ sbnsw . com . au
  • Re: Java security risk (bypassing firewalls)
    From: peter @ nmti . com (Peter da Silva)
  • NEC's New PrivateNet Firewall Product (fwd)
    From: curt @ ibu . sj . nec . com (Curt Dodson)
  • NEC's New PrivateNet Firewall Product
    From: curt @ ibu . sj . nec . com (Curt Dodson)
  • Re: Pentagon displays due respect for hackers
    From: Barry Anderson <bwa @ cednsw . telecom . com . au>
  • Re: KNOCK - KNOCK!
    From: Alan Olsen <alano @ teleport . com>
  • Firewalls for NT - update
    From: pmoen @ sbnsw . com . au
  • version HTTP CERN for sco
    From: Edwin Montoya <emontoya @ sigma . eafit . edu . co>
  • Re: CERN Proxy (WHERE?)
    From: long-morrow @ CS . YALE . EDU
  • SGI Security Advisory 19960203
    From: "SGI Security Coordinator" <agent99 @ boytoy . csd . sgi . com>
  • Re: Pentagon displays due respect for hackers
    From: Sick Puppy <sikpuppy @ maestro . com>
• Tuesday 27 February 1996
  • Re: Pentagon displays due respect for hackers
    From: Chris Eastman <chris @ cwi . net>
  • Re: KNOCK - KNOCK!
    From: Ken Hardy <ken @ bridge . com>
  • What port does NT use for logins?
    From: Chris Carlson <carlson @ bah . com>
  • Re: RealAudio and firewalls
    From: smb @ research . att . com
  • Proxy-server for AOL client???
    From: Doug Ayen <ayen @ access . digex . net>
  • Re: Java security risk (bypassing firewalls)
    From: D . Thomas @ vthrc . uq . edu . au (Danny Thomas)
  • Re: RealAudio and firewalls
    From: pollock @ houston . omnes . net (Don Pollock - Omnes - Engineering)
  • SAProuter
    From: Ginger <jsong @ amer . net>
  • Re: SQL*Net proxy?
    From: char <char @ trusted . com>
  • Re: NT Firewall Products
    From: russo @ interramp . com (Bob Russo)
  • Re: Unidentified doorknocking - sysadmin stumped
    From: dlewis @ Rt66 . com (David Lewis)
  • Network Tools
    From: "Jim Leo" <ADMIN @ everett . pitt . cc . nc . us>
  • Re: SQL*Net proxy?
    From: Steve Gaarder <gaarder @ actech . com>
  • Re: SQL*Net proxy?
    From: pauck @ rs3 . wmd . de (Marco Pauck)
  • Re: Unidentified doorknocking - sysadmin stumped
    From: Tim Keanini <blast @ crl . com>
  • Re: CERN Proxy (WHERE?)
    From: peter @ nmti . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Firewall-1-v1.2.1 & OSPF
    From: Einar . Landre @ sdata . no (Einar Landre)
  • Address Allocation for Private Internets
    From: Yakov Rekhter <yakov @ cisco . com>
  • FW: VPN's over the internet
    From: Greg Brennan <brenngp @ onto . network . com>
  • Firewall in an ATM environment
    From: lalit @ smiley . mitre . org (Lalit Batra)
  • SAProuter
    From: Mark Smith <msmith @ usair . com>
  • Pentagon displays due respect for hackers
    From: Sick Puppy <sikpuppy @ maestro . com>
  • RE: VPN's over the internet
    From: Robert Campbell <rjc @ mari . co . uk>
  • Re: Unidentified doorknocking - sysadmin stumped
    From: "Joseph L. Moll" <jmoll @ acquion . com>
  • Re: ftp and html through firewall
    From: rebowes @ tasc . com (Bob Bowes)
  • Re: RealAudio and Firewalls
    From: "Bryan D. Boyle" <bdboyle @ stargate . erenj . com>
  • Java security risk (bypassing firewalls)
    From: Jonathan Larmour <jlarmour @ origin-at . co . uk>
  • [no subject]
    From: RPGR @ cbs . nl
  • Re: RealAudio and firewalls
    From: Kare Presttun <Kare . Presttun @ ansf . alcatel . fr>
  • Re: The Secure Operating Systems Question
    From: daemeonr @ phoebe . Anthros . Com (Daemeon's)
  • Request for Help on Packet Driver
    From: Vinay Sawarkar <vinay @ rolta . com>
  • Re: SQL*Net proxy?
    From: Vinci CHOU <vkmchou @ HK . Super . NET>
  • Unidentified doorknocking - sysadmin stumped
    From: Adam Horwitz <adam @ tripcom . com>
  • Re: RealAudio and Firewalls
    From: "Emily G. Cohen" <emily @ us . checkpoint . com>
• Monday 26 February 1996
  • Truth is stranger than fiction
    From: "KM" <goertzek @ gateway . wangfed . com>
  • VPN's over the internet
    From: "Joseph L. Moll" <jmoll @ acquion . com>
  • Re: Los Alamos Breakins - HOAX
    From: David Kovar <kovar @ nda . com>
  • Re: Commercial SOCKS based firewall
    From: Rolf Weber <weber @ iez . com>
  • NT Firewall Products
    From: pmoen @ sbnsw . com . au
  • RE: Anyone have more info about this breakin?
    From: "Emily G. Cohen" <emily @ us . checkpoint . com>
  • Los Alamos Breakins - HOAX
    From: Wyllys Ingersoll <wyllys @ reston . ans . net>
  • Re: RealAudio and firewalls
    From: jgt10 @ amdahl . com (John G. Thompson)
  • Re: dos sniffers?
    From: "Joseph L. Moll" <jmoll @ acquion . com>
  • Re: CERN Proxy (WHERE?)
    From: Chris Woods <cjwoods @ Paladin . COM>
  • Re: Commercial SOCKS based firewall
    From: "W.C. Epperson" <epperson @ vak12ed . edu>
  • dropsafe s/w
    From: Tom Cooper <asec @ access . digex . net>
  • Re: RealAudio and firewalls
    From: Bryan Koen <bkoen @ ns2 . cpicorp . com>
  • Re: dos sniffers?
    From: peter @ nmti . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Re: Linux Disadvantages (Edited Question)
    From: Jonathan Larmour <jlarmour @ origin-at . co . uk>
  • Re: Commercial SOCKS based firewall
    From: Frederick M Avolio <avolio @ trusted . com>
  • Re: Commercial SOCKS based firewall
    From: Frederick M Avolio <avolio @ trusted . com>
  • Re: Linux Disadvantages
    From: Jon Whitton <jonw @ mountcomp . co . uk>
  • Re: dos sniffers?
    From: "W.C. Epperson" <epperson @ vak12ed . edu>
  • Re: Commercial SOCKS based firewall
    From: Jody C Patilla <jcp @ tis . com>
  • Los Alamos Scenario
    From: Gavin Ferreiro <gavin @ tml . co . za>
  • RealAudio and firewalls
    From: richard . ellis @ kpmg . co . uk
  • Re: Firewalls as we know them are dead meat ?? (Long)
    From: "Lack Mr G M" <gml4410 @ ggr . co . uk>
  • Re: Linux Disadvantages
    From: Ken Hardy <ken @ bridge . com>
• Sunday 25 February 1996
  • Re: Commercial SOCKS based firewall
    From: Bjorn Satdeva <bjorn @ sysadmin . com>
  • Re: Linux Disadvantages
    From: sysadmin account <jclark @ picard . nib . com>
  • Re: Linux Disadvantages
    From: Ken Hardy <ken @ bridge . com>
  • Re: Los Alamos breakins
    From: Rolf Weber <weber @ iez . com>
• Saturday 24 February 1996
  • Linux Disadvantages (Edited Question)
    From: Mustapha Obeid <musta @ eve . info . umoncton . ca>
  • Re: Los Alamos breakins
    From: thompson jeffrey w <jwthomp @ cs . uiuc . edu>
  • Linux Disadvantages
    From: Mustapha Obeid <musta @ eve . info . umoncton . ca>
• Friday 23 February 1996
  • Re: dos sniffers
    From: Sick Puppy <sikpuppy @ maestro . com>
  • Re: Commercial SOCKS based firewall
    From: blob @ syl . dl . nec . com (Dave Blob)
  • Re: Terminology??
    From: Velvet Jones <jkirkham @ coeds . eng . miami . edu>
  • Re: firewall backup ? (fwd)
    From: gvilla @ minerva1 . bull . it (Guido Villa)
  • Re: Firewalls as we know them are dead meat ?? (Long)
    From: peter @ nmti . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Re: CERN HTTPD Proxy Rules
    From: Matt Holdrege <matt @ hsa . com>
  • RE: Terminology??
    From: Jesse Gambetti <JGambetti @ msmail . radisys . com>
  • Re: dos sniffers?
    From: peter @ nmti . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Re: Firewalls as we know them are dead meat ?? (Long)
    From: Brent Chapman <Brent @ greatcircle . com>
  • Re: Terminology??
    From: "Margaret H. McMahan" <mmcmahan @ posh . internext . com>
  • Re: Archie ?
    From: Brent Chapman <Brent @ greatcircle . com>
  • Re: firewall backup ?
    From: Pete Lancashire <petel @ seikotsi . com>
  • Re: Terminology??
    From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
  • Re[2]: Anyone have more info about this breakin?
    From: Mark_W_Loveless @ smtp . bnr . com
  • RE: CERN HTTPD Proxy Rules
    From: long-morrow @ CS . YALE . EDU
  • Re: looking for PD FTP client that supports PASV
    From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <m1jmb00 @ FRB . GOV>
  • Re: firewall backup ?
    From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <m1jmb00 @ FRB . GOV>
  • Re: Security aspects of user names (more)
    From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <m1jmb00 @ FRB . GOV>
  • Re: looking for PD FTP client that supports PASV
    From: dhw @ filoli . com (David Wolfskill)
  • Re: firewall backup ?
    From: Ken Hardy <ken @ bridge . com>
  • Re: Los Alamos breakins
    From: Dan Schlitt <dan @ ees1a0 . engr . ccny . cuny . edu>
  • Re: Los Alamos breakins
    From: Kent Dahlgren <kent @ trouble . WV . TEK . COM>
  • Terminology??
    From: "Joseph L. Moll" <jmoll @ acquion . com>
  • Re: Los Alamos breakins
    From: "Bryan D. Boyle" <bdboyle @ stargate . erenj . com>
  • Re: Los Alamos breakins
    From: Ron DuFresne <dufresne @ winternet . com>
  • Re: Los Alamos breakins
    From: Frederick M Avolio <avolio @ trusted . com>
  • Re: Commercial SOCKS based firewall
    From: Frederick M Avolio <avolio @ trusted . com>
  • CERN proxy
    From: "Mark Horn [ Net Ops ]" <mhorn @ funb . com>
  • CERN Proxy (WHERE?)
    From: Don Lafontaine <lafont02 @ godzilla . cn . ca>
  • Firewall compartmentalization
    From: Matt Mower <M . Mower @ unl . ac . uk>
  • Re: Los Alamos breakins
    From: "Bryan D. Boyle" <bdboyle @ stargate . erenj . com>
  • Tripwire on HP 10.x
    From: David C Brown <browndc @ ttown . apci . com>
  • RE: CERN HTTPD Proxy Rules
    From: Sigurd Hogsbro <sigurd . hogsbro @ lce . co . uk>
  • Re: ftp and html through firewall
    From: Martin Fredriksson <emwmf @ emw . ericsson . se>
  • looking for PD FTP client that supports PASV
    From: Alex Pakter <Alex . Pakter @ omnitel . it>
  • RE: Anyone have more info about this breakin?
    From: kahar @ sebank . se
  • Re: Firewalls as we know them are dead meat ?? (Long)
    From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
  • Re: CERN HTTPD Proxy Rules
    From: Alex Pakter <Alex . Pakter @ omnitel . it>
  • IBM SNG V2.1
    From: John Schoonover <100655 . 1065 @ compuserve . com>
  • Los Alamos breakins
    From: "Steve V. Yalovitser" <root @ cyberpunk . com>
  • Re: ftp and html through firewall
    From: Andrew Benhase <abenhase @ Tach . Net>
  • Re: CERN/WS-FTP proxy
    From: Andrew Benhase <abenhase @ Tach . Net>
  • Re: Instant Internet from Performance Technology -Reply
    From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
  • Firewalls as we know them are dead meat ?? (Long)
    From: johnd @ internet . netway . co . nz
  • Re: Commercial SOCKS based firewall
    From: Bjorn Satdeva <bjorn @ sysadmin . com>
  • Instant Internet from Performance Technology -Reply
    From: Mike Romeo <ROMEO @ mail . co . stanislaus . ca . us>
  • firewall backup ?
    From: Kim <cgkim @ kotel . co . kr>
  • RE: Security aspects of user names
    From: gregg @ smtpgate . Disclosure . COM
  • Security aspects of user names (more)
    From: Martin Fredriksson <martin @ msp . se>
• Thursday 22 February 1996
  • Anyone have more info about this breakin?
    From: mmoshman @ imfaix2s . imf . org (Marc Moshman)
  • Re: dos sniffers?
    From: ren @ alpo . casc . com (Ren Yonghong)
  • Re: dos sniffers?
    From: David Loysen <dwl @ hnc . com>
  • Re: ftp and html through firewall
    From: jgt10 @ amdahl . com (John G. Thompson)
  • Re: Security aspects of user names
    From: Rolf Weber <weber @ iez . com>
  • Re: your mail
    From: Charles_Ragan @ ins . com (Charles Ragan)
  • Re: Security aspects of user names
    From: rebowes @ tasc . com (Bob Bowes)
  • ftp and html through firewall
    From: rebowes @ tasc . com (Bob Bowes)
  • Re: your mail
    From: Mike Malik -- Dover DE <mam @ ssds . com>
  • dos sniffers?
    From: jay . stone @ net-link . com (Jay Stone)
  • Commercial SOCKS based firewall
    From: Bjorn Satdeva <bjorn @ sysadmin . com>
  • Re[2]: Missing attachment for Warning - WebConsole...
    From: Brian Murrell <murrell @ bctel . net>
  • Re: inerestin' stats
    From: nreadwin @ london . micrognosis . com (Neil Readwin)
  • Tripwire 1.2 on Linux
    From: rhicks @ MO . NET (Rick Hicks)
  • DEC SEAL Firewall
    From: jon @ nytimes . com (Jon E. Price)
  • Re: TCSEC and ITSEC
    From: Les Carleton <les @ tracker . demon . co . uk>
  • [no subject]
    From: bwalker @ musings . com (Brad Walker)
  • inerestin' stats
    From: carl . johnson @ nautronix . com . au (Carl Johnson)
  • Re: CERN/WS-FTP proxy
    From: Rabid Wombat <wombat @ mcfeely . bsfs . org>
  • Re: Security aspects of user names
    From: ewedaa @ kset . com
  • Instant Internet from Performance Technology
    From: johnd @ internet . netway . co . nz
  • Re: Portmapper broadcasts
    From: bobk @ manzanita . DEV . 3Com . COM (Bob Konigsberg)
• Wednesday 21 February 1996
  • Re: OFF-(COLOUR) TOPIC: Internet Cleanup (fwd)
    From: Ken Hardy <ken @ bridge . com>
  • Re: A puzzle
    From: Rabid Wombat <wombat @ mcfeely . bsfs . org>
  • Re: OFF-(COLOUR) TOPIC: Internet Cleanup (fwd)
    From: peterg @ mccaw-stg . com (Peter Gregory)
  • CERN/WS-FTP proxy
    From: Tim Clement <Tim . Clement @ OAG . STATE . TX . US>
  • Re[2]: OFF-(COLOUR) TOPIC: Internet Cleanup (fwd)
    From: kabernard @ techsoft . com (KABERNARD)
  • RE: article, pcweek: InocuLAN leaves NT servers open!
    From: Russ <Russ . Cooper @ RC . Toronto . on . ca>
  • Re: TACACS+ Protocol
    From: "Jim Thompson" <jim @ SmallWorks . COM>
  • Security aspects of user names
    From: Martin Fredriksson <martin @ msp . se>
  • CERN/WS-FTP proxy
    From: Tim Clement <Tim . Clement @ OAG . STATE . TX . US>
  • internet crawling robots...( Was: OFF-(COLOUR) TOPIC: Internet Cleanup )
    From: jim @ coltano . stortek . com (Jim Wamsley 303-673-8163)
  • Re: Missing attachment for Warning - WebConsole...
    From: avi @ webmaster . com (Avi Singh)
  • TACACS+ Protocol
    From: Eric Caron <ecaron @ globale . net>
  • Re: A puzzle
    From: Bob Resino <pnh1rgr @ mclo10 . med . navy . mil>
  • Re: FWTK telnet gateway connecting to an IBM Mainframe (tn3270)
    From: Adam Prato <adamp @ mickey . ovid . com>
  • Portmapper broadcasts
    From: Gerhard Mehldau <mehldau @ photogrammetrie . de>
  • Re: A puzzle
    From: blymn @ awadi . com . au (Brett Lymn)
  • Re: Survey
    From: Matthew Cable <mec @ itg . net>
  • Re: OFF-(COLOUR) TOPIC: Internet Cleanup (fwd)
    From: Kent Dahlgren <kent @ trouble . WV . TEK . COM>
  • Re: WebConsole availability
    From: Rabid Wombat <wombat @ mcfeely . bsfs . org>
  • Re: Usubscribe Firewalls
    From: Robert Bonomi <bonomi @ delta . eecs . nwu . edu>
• Tuesday 20 February 1996
  • Re: spam from WebConsole
    From: Kent Dahlgren <kent @ trouble . WV . TEK . COM>
  • FWTK telnet gateway connecting to an IBM Mainframe (tn3270)
    From: "Mix, S.R." <MIXSR @ pjm . com>
  • Re: traceroute
    From: Matt Holdrege <matt @ hsa . com>
  • Re: traceroute
    From: R Prabhakar <vpu @ BITS . soft . net>
  • Re: Httpd Proxy
    From: R Prabhakar <vpu @ BITS . soft . net>
  • Usubscribe Firewalls
    From: EVANEV @ WPOSMTP . METC . DOE . GOV
  • Re: OFF-(COLOUR) TOPIC: Internet Cleanup (fwd)
    From: "KM" <goertzek @ gateway . wangfed . com>
  • spam from WebConsole
    From: Gary Stanny <stanny @ handset . laa . com>
  • Re: TCSEC and ITSEC
    From: "KM" <goertzek @ gateway . wangfed . com>
  • A puzzle
    From: "Ashley Miller" <Ashley_Miller @ cpqm . saic . com>
  • Re: OFF-(COLOUR) TOPIC: Internet Cleanup
    From: Dermot Tynan <dtynan @ fws . ilo . dec . com>
  • Documentation
    From: "Michael R. Casalinuovo" <mcasalin @ cmgi . com>
  • RE: article, pcweek: InocuLAN leaves NT servers open!
    From: Russ <Russ . Cooper @ RC . Toronto . on . ca>
  • WebConsole availability
    From: avi @ webmaster . com (Avi Singh)
  • Re: Router ACLs
    From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
  • Re: article, pcweek: InocuLAN leaves NT servers open!
    From: David Wade <dw @ e . salford-software-services . co . uk>
  • Re: cable modems
    From: lemson @ uiuc . edu (David Lemson)
  • Re: OFF-(COLOUR) TOPIC: Internet Cleanup (fwd)
    From: Barry Anderson <bwa @ cednsw . telecom . com . au>
  • Re: Survey
    From: Brain21 <brain21 @ montag33 . residence . gatech . edu>
  • Re: question about Netscape's proxy server
    From: Steve Marak <SAMARAK @ UAFSYSB . UARK . EDU>
  • Re: Performance on a Linux box
    From: Greg Boykin <geboykin @ AlCon . Com>
  • Re: traceroute
    From: blymn @ awadi . com . au (Brett Lymn)
  • Re: OFF-(COLOUR) TOPIC: Internet Cleanup (fwd)
    From: Leanne Archer <leanne @ magna . com . au>
  • Re: Httpd Proxy
    From: Joe Ramey <ramey @ csc . ti . com>
  • ADSL/VDSL [Was: Re: Cable Modems]
    From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
  • Re: traceroute
    From: Mark Clayton <markc @ mentor . co . nz>
• Monday 19 February 1996
  • Re: Cable Modems
    From: sedayao @ argus . intel . com (Jeffrey C. Sedayao)
  • Re: OS Bigotry
    From: Rabid Wombat <wombat @ mcfeely . bsfs . org>
  • Workstations with Network and dial up PPP, Security Risks?
    From: "Lachlan Mann" <docloc @ msn . com>
  • Re: Performance on a Linux box
    From: Luis M Ibarra <mibarra @ galois . dgaesc . unam . mx>
  • Re: traceroute
    From: Arley Carter <ac @ hawk . twinds . com>
  • question about Netscape's proxy server
    From: "Luis A. Munoz" <luis @ web . uprr . pr>
  • Resources regarding use of RFC 1597 addresses
    From: Michael Dillon <michael @ memra . com>
  • Re: Performance on a Linux box
    From: Jim Shankland <jas @ flyingfox . COM>
  • Re: Performance on a Linux box
    From: Dave Dillow <il1 @ dsroc6 . dsdoe . ornl . gov>
  • RE: OS Bigotry
    From: David Loysen <dwl @ hnc . com>
  • Re: Missing attachment for Warning - WebConsole...
    From: peter @ nmti . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Re: Httpd Proxy
    From: peter @ nmti . com (Peter da Silva)
  • traceroute
    From: Juan Carlos Machado <juank @ ciat . cgiar . org>
  • Re: Performance on a Linux box
    From: "Mark A. DeLoura" <markdel @ noa . com>
  • Router ACLs
    From: "Dan Vukelich" <Dan_Vukelich @ qmgateib . mitre . org>
  • Re: article, pcweek: InocuLAN leaves NT servers open!
    From: peter @ nmti . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Re: article, pcweek: InocuLAN leaves NT servers open!
    From: peter @ nmti . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Re: OS Bigotry
    From: peter @ nmti . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Quaterdeck IWare Connect
    From: Alan Morris <vach @ sasknet . sk . ca>
  • RE: BorderGuard
    From: Michael Brown <BROWNMK @ misf . network . com>
  • Usertransparent Firewall
    From: bytevampy @ relay4 . l . netwing . at
  • RE: Performance on a Linux box
    From: Frederick M Avolio <avolio @ trusted . com>
  • Re: oh, just see if you can get in
    From: Stephen Schaefer - Network Computing Solutions <stephen . schaefer @ imonics . com>
  • Re: Httpd Proxy
    From: Chris Woods <cjwoods @ Paladin . COM>
  • CERN HTTPD Proxy Rules
    From: David Campbell <campbell @ BMNET . COM>
  • Re: Performance on a Linux box
    From: Thomas Lundquist <fw @ castle . hiof . no>
  • Re: Httpd Proxy
    From: long-morrow @ CS . YALE . EDU
  • Re: BorderGuard/ Gauntlet 3.1. Packet Filter
    From: robp @ anubis . network . com (Rob Peglar)
  • Re: strange UNIX syslog msg (Firewalls-Digest V5 #102)
    From: Chiaki Ishikawa <ishikawa @ personal-media . co . jp>
  • Httpd Proxy
    From: Philip Sloan <philip . sloan @ shorts . co . uk>
  • Re: Performance on a Linux box [actually 3c509 ethercards]
    From: Ron DuFresne <dufresne @ winternet . com>
  • Re: Performance on a Linux box [actually 3c509 ethercards]
    From: Nigel Metheringham <Nigel . Metheringham @ ThePLAnet . net>
  • Re: Certification
    From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
  • Re: Performance on a Linux box
    From: Shoel Perelman <sdp4198 @ is2 . nyu . edu>
  • Re: Cable Modems...
    From: "Kenneth J. Stephens" <janken @ rust . net>
  • Re: Certification
    From: Mike Shaver <shaver @ neon . ingenia . com>
• Sunday 18 February 1996
  • Firewall Security
    From: Arthur Thodis <Arthur_Thodis%DPC @ notes . worldcom . com>
  • Missing attachment for Warning - WebConsole...
    From: Russ <Russ . Cooper @ RC . Toronto . on . ca>
  • Warning - WebConsole opens DoS hole in NT
    From: Russ <Russ . Cooper @ RC . Toronto . on . ca>
  • Re: Cable Modems
    From: Sick Puppy <sikpuppy @ maestro . com>
  • RE: article, pcweek: InocuLAN leaves NT servers open!
    From: Russ <Russ . Cooper @ RC . Toronto . on . ca>
  • Harris CyberGuard
    From: "mrjantz @ internext . com" <mrjantz @ posh . internext . com>
  • TCSEC and ITSEC
    From: Danny Cox <dannyc @ gmap . leeds . ac . uk>
  • RE: article, pcweek: InocuLAN leaves NT servers open!
    From: Ron DuFresne <dufresne @ winternet . com>
  • RE: article, pcweek: InocuLAN leaves NT servers open!
    From: Ed Woodrick <ewoodrick @ ed-com . com>
  • Re: Certification
    From: kees @ echelon . nl (Kees Hendrikse)
  • Re: JAVA security problem ?
    From: peter @ nmti . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Re: article, pcweek: InocuLAN leaves NT servers open!
    From: peter @ nmti . com (Peter da Silva)
  • syslogd source for Solaris anybody?
    From: Michael Haberler <mah @ ic . co . at>
  • wwwblock-1.0 : alpha version available for testing
    From: long-morrow @ CS . YALE . EDU
  • Re: Cable Modems...
    From: sedayao @ argus . intel . com (Jeffrey C. Sedayao)
  • RE: Performance on a Linux box
    From: Ken Hardy <ken @ bridge . com>
  • RE: BorderGuard/ Gauntlet 3.1. Packet Filter
    From: Frank Willoughby <frankw @ in . net>
  • Re: Certification
    From: Frank Willoughby <frankw @ in . net>
  • RE: BorderGuard/ Gauntlet 3.1. Packet Filter
    From: jeromie @ garrison . com (Jeromie Jackson)
• Saturday 17 February 1996
  • RE: OS Bigotry -Reply
    From: Matthew Thompson <un04!mthomps1%manukau . govt . nz @ iconz . co . nz>
  • Re: Protecting a web page
    From: Jerry Champlin <jgc @ webspan . com>
  • Cable Modems...
    From: Russ <Russ . Cooper @ RC . Toronto . on . ca>
  • Re: Fast Firewalls?
    From: Mike Shaver <shaver @ neon . ingenia . com>
  • RE: Performance on a Linux box
    From: Shoel Perelman <sdp4198 @ is2 . nyu . edu>
  • RE: BorderGuard/ Gauntlet 3.1. Packet Filter
    From: Chris Kostick <ckostick @ csc . com>
  • Re: Private FTP / Mail
    From: Adam Shostack <adam @ homeport . org>
  • Re: source for ls
    From: Matthew Cable <mec @ itg . net>
  • RE: OS Bigotry
    From: dcristini @ true . NET (Daniel Cristini)
  • Re: BorderGuard/ Gauntlet 3.1. Packet Filter
    From: jeromie @ garrison . com (Jeromie Jackson)
  • Re: port 42 - /etc/services
    From: Chris Woods <cjwoods @ Paladin . COM>
  • Re: Protecting a web page
    From: C Matthew Curtin <cmcurtin @ gatekeeper . cb . att . com>
  • Re: Performance on a Linux box
    From: sysadmin account <jclark @ picard . nib . com>
  • Re: Private FTP / Mail
    From: Moroni <moroni @ scranton . com>
  • Re: Performance on a Linux box
    From: long-morrow @ CS . YALE . EDU
  • oh, just see if you can get in
    From: *Hobbit* <hobbit @ avian . org>
  • Certification
    From: "A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security" <PADGETT @ hobbes . orl . mmc . com>
  • RE: New Encryption SDoftware Technology Available
    From: Jonathon Tidswell <t-jont @ microsoft . com>
  • Certification
    From: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr @ clark . net>
  • Re: Firewalls-Digest V5 #104
    From: pine-faq @ docserver . cac . washington . edu
  • Re: Network diagramming tool
    From: long-morrow @ CS . YALE . EDU
  • want to see ip_forwarding works.
    From: Kim <cgkim @ kotel . co . kr>
  • Re: Passing SAP through a firewall
    From: char <char @ trusted . com>
  • Re: source for ls
    From: Barney Wolff <barney @ databus . com>
• Friday 16 February 1996
  • OFF-(COLOUR) TOPIC: Internet Cleanup (fwd)
    From: "KM" <goertzek @ gateway . wangfed . com>
  • Re: Protecting a web page
    From: Ping Huang <pshuang @ sgihub . corp . sgi . com>
  • Re: Follow-up: source for ls
    From: Adam Shostack <adam @ homeport . org>
  • Re: Network diagramming tool
    From: "Kenneth J. Stephens" <janken @ rust . net>
  • SGI Security Advisory 19960202-01-A, CERT CA-96.02
    From: "SGI Security Coordinator" <agent99 @ boytoy . csd . sgi . com>
  • SGI Security Advisory 19960201-01-A, CERT CA-96.01
    From: "SGI Security Coordinator" <agent99 @ boytoy . csd . sgi . com>
  • Re: Firewalls-Digest V5 #75
    From: Michael Brown <BROWNMK @ misf . network . com>
  • BorderGuard
    From: vbaca @ Coded . COM (Virginia L. Baca)
  • Re: Fast Firewalls?
    From: Michael Brown <BROWNMK @ misf . network . com>
  • ICMP Source Routes
    From: Jamison Gulden <jamison @ infocast . com>
  • re: Protecting a web page
    From: "A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security" <PADGETT @ hobbes . orl . mmc . com>
  • Re: Protecting a web page
    From: "Bryan D. Boyle" <bdboyle @ stargate . erenj . com>
  • Re: Protecting a web page
    From: Marc Kneppers <marc @ eeyore . pamco . com>
  • Follow-up: source for ls
    From: lacey @ dsea . com (Dan Lacey)
  • port 42 - /etc/services
    From: steve @ i-co . co . uk (Steve England)
  • Re: source for ls
    From: R Prabhakar <vpu @ BITS . soft . net>
  • Re: Protecting a web page
    From: peter @ nmti . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Re: The Secure Operating Systems Question
    From: ccallen @ questar . com (Conan Callen)
  • Re(2): port 113?
    From: XINCLXFirewalls-ml @ scet . org . uk (Firewalls-ml Conference @ scet.org.uk)
  • Re: Protecting a web page
    From: NetSurfer <netsurf @ pixi . com>
  • Re: Protecting a web page
    From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <m1jmb00 @ FRB . GOV>
  • Performance on a Linux box
    From: Roger Joss <giarjo @ gia . ch>
  • Re: The Secure Operating Systems Question
    From: Ian Johnstone-Bryden <ianj-b @ dial . pipex . com>
  • Re: Protecting a web page
    From: "Bryan D. Boyle" <bdboyle @ erenj . com>
  • Re: Fast Firewalls?
    From: "Rick Murphy" <rick @ trusted . com>
  • Re: Port 838
    From: rrietz @ sadis01 . kelly . af . mil (RONALD E. RIETZ - FMPS)
  • Re: The Secure Operating Systems Question
    From: mdr @ vodka . sse . att . com
  • Protecting a web page
    From: John Schoonover <100655 . 1065 @ compuserve . com>
  • Re: source for ls
    From: Chris Woods <cjwoods @ Paladin . COM>
  • Mailing List
    From: <Martin_Hammerhofer . BWS @ NOTES . compuserve . com>
  • Re: source for ls
    From: Adam Shostack <adam @ homeport . org>
  • Re: The Secure Operating Systems Question
    From: Rolf Weber <weber @ iez . com>
  • Re: SAP through a firewall
    From: Declan McGill <mcgill @ ebo . dec . com>
  • Re: Fast Firewalls?
    From: Pascal . Trouvin @ integralis . co . uk
  • Re: INN/NNTP Security Implications
    From: Casper . Dik @ Holland . Sun . COM (Casper Dik - ENS Network Security - Network Security Engineer)
  • Re: tcpdump modifications
    From: firewalls @ count04 . mry . scruznet . com
  • Re: JAVA security problem ?
    From: Mike Shaver <shaver @ neon . ingenia . com>
  • RE: Windows NT Mail Gateway
    From: Chris Pugrud <cpugrud @ primenet . com>
• Thursday 15 February 1996
  • Re: The Secure Operating Systems Question
    From: Kevin Lahey <kml @ mathcs . emory . edu>
  • Re: INN/NNTP Security Implications
    From: nreadwin @ london . micrognosis . com (Neil Readwin)
  • Re: MS-Windows PC as an email gateway
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • Fast Firewalls?
    From: Michael Laufer <mlaufer @ BBN . COM>
  • Re: Firewall-1 Version Comparison
    From: mark @ ccifl . com (Mark Sherman)
  • Passing SAP through a firewall
    From: Peter Curran <pcurran @ ticl . co . uk>
  • strange UNIX syslog msg
    From: "Jerry Edmiston" <jle9 @ eci-esyst . com>
  • Does anyone know of a good subnetting software program?
    From: "Douglas M. Todd, Jr." <doug @ fc . com>
  • source for ls
    From: lacey @ dsea . com (Dan Lacey)
  • can I run DNS on a packet screening gateway.
    From: Alex Pakter <Alex . Pakter @ omnitel . it>
  • Re: Private FTP / Mail
    From: Jesse Gambetti <JGambetti @ msmail . radisys . com>
  • Archie ?
    From: Tom . Aurlund @ notes . comma . no
  • Off-topic
    From: John Pilley <jpilley @ lioninc . com>
  • Re: port 113?
    From: peter @ nmti . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Re: article, pcweek: InocuLAN leaves NT servers open!
    From: Ron DuFresne <dufresne @ winternet . com>
  • Port 838
    From: David Worthington <dave @ chadwyck . co . uk>
  • Re: The Secure Operating Systems Question
    From: Ian Johnstone-Bryden <ianj-b @ dial . pipex . com>
  • tcpdump motif frontend pointers...
    From: "R. M. DuFresne" <dufresne @ darkstar . sysinfo . com>
  • Re: MS-Windows PC as an email gateway
    From: jr @ amanue . pgh . net (Jim Rosenberg)
  • Re: Private FTP / Mail
    From: Adam Shostack <adam @ homeport . org>
  • winsock sercurity
    From: Jeffry Tank <jtankf @ vsecorp . com>
  • Re: article, pcweek: InocuLAN leaves NT servers open!
    From: "Ralph C. Wolman" <rcw @ netrix . com>
  • Re: list of port numbers above 255
    From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
  • RE: Gauntlet 3.1 Packet Filter?
    From: Frederick M Avolio <avolio @ trusted . com>
  • Re: list of port numbers above 255
    From: gary flynn <gary @ habanero . jmu . edu>
  • Re: Firewall-1 Version Comparison
    From: Jim Brown <jim . brown @ ptech . com>
  • Re: port 113?
    From: legg @ sun1plus . liebert . com (Jim Legg)
  • Re: The Secure Operating Systems Question
    From: "Lack Mr G M" <gml4410 @ ggr . co . uk>
  • article, pcweek: InocuLAN leaves NT servers open!
    From: Ron DuFresne <dufresne @ winternet . com>
  • Re: port 113?
    From: Chris Woods <cjwoods @ Paladin . COM>
  • Re: tcpdump modifications
    From: Ron DuFresne <dufresne @ winternet . com>
  • Re: Firewall comparison chart???
    From: Kang Eun-Seong <kes @ coda . info . samsung . co . kr>
• Wednesday 14 February 1996
  • netSP / secure-net-gateway
    From: *Hobbit* <hobbit @ avian . org>
  • Re: Need a few pointers
    From: "Eliot T. Ware" <etware @ access . digex . net>
  • Re: Web browser ports?
    From: Jeff Murphy <jcmurphy @ smurfland . cit . buffalo . edu>
  • Re: Firewalls-Digest V5 #75
    From: Rachel Rosencrantz <golda @ predictive . com>
  • Re: INN/NNTP Security Implications
    From: woods @ ncar . ucar . edu (Greg Woods)
  • Re: Firewalls-Digest V5 #45
    From: firewalls @ count04 . mry . scruznet . com
  • Network diagramming tool
    From: Brain21 <brain21 @ montag33 . residence . gatech . edu>
  • Private FTP / Mail
    From: Jesse Gambetti <JGambetti @ msmail . radisys . com>
  • tcpdump modifications
    From: Chris Eastman <chris @ cwi . net>
  • Re: Harris Computer product viability.
    From: William C Curtiss <William . Curtiss @ mail . hcsc . com>
  • RE: Gauntlet 3.1 Packet Filter?
    From: Michael Brown <BROWNMK @ misf . network . com>
  • Re: Firewall-1 Version Comparison
    From: Pascal . Trouvin @ integralis . co . uk
  • RE: PC Magazine article on firewalls
    From: Sick Puppy <sikpuppy @ maestro . com>
  • Re: The Secure Operating Systems Question
    From: Les Carleton <les @ tracker . demon . co . uk>
  • Re: Firewalls-Digest V5 #45
    From: Rachel Rosencrantz <golda @ predictive . com>
  • The Secure Operating Systems Question
    From: Les Carleton <les @ tracker . demon . co . uk>
  • Request from a student
    From: jjury @ bournemouth . ac . uk (James Jury)
  • Firewalls-Digest V5 #97 -Reply
    From: CWSTAFFORD @ deserthosp . org
  • Stevens, Vol 3
    From: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr @ clark . net>
  • Re: Need a few pointers
    From: "Ashley Miller" <Ashley_Miller @ cpqm . saic . com>
  • RE: Web browser ports?
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • Re: Web browser ports?
    From: Jim Legg <legg @ sun1plus . liebert . com>
  • RE: Gauntlet 3.1 Packet Filter?
    From: jeromie @ garrison . com (Jeromie Jackson)
  • PC s/w for testing TCP Ports
    From: gblolmxb @ ibmmail . com
  • Re#c#_Firewall_comparison_ch#201#
    From: "Tim Darnauer" <tldb @ eci-esyst . com>
  • Re: Need a few pointers
    From: Michel Lavondes <lavondes @ tidtest . total . fr>
  • RE: Web browser ports?
    From: Jim Legg <legg @ sun1plus . liebert . com>
  • Re: Firewall comparison chart???
    From: Jim Legg <legg @ sun1plus . liebert . com>
  • list of port numbers above 255
    From: "Jeffry L'H. Tank" <jtank @ vsecorp . com>
  • RE: Gauntlet 3.1 Packet Filter?
    From: Michael Brown <BROWNMK @ misf . network . com>
  • Re: port 113?
    From: Kyle Amon <kyle_amon @ jabil . com>
  • Win NT protocols?
    From: Petter . Haggman @ lule . frontec . se (Petter H{ggman)
  • a word of thanks
    From: "Phil Davidson" <fil @ mojo . europe . dg . com>
  • RE: Firewall comparison chart???
    From: Denis Valois <Denis . Valois @ pt . nce . sita . int>
  • Re: Re: Firewall comparison chart???
    From: "Kang, Eun-Seong" <kes @ coda . info . samsung . co . kr>
  • PC Magazine article on firewalls
    From: Sick Puppy <sikpuppy @ maestro . com>
  • RE: Gauntlet 3.1 Packet Filter?
    From: jeromie @ garrison . com (Jeromie Jackson)
  • INN/NNTP Security Implications
    From: Scott Surguine <surguine @ csn . net>
• Tuesday 13 February 1996
  • firewall development project
    From: jsampson @ caribe-85 . Eng . Sun . COM (James Sampson [TEMP])
  • Re: your mail
    From: mark @ ccifl . com (Mark Sherman)
  • Re: port 113?
    From: Bill Van Emburg <bve @ jcrew . com>
  • Firewalls and Lotus Notes Summary
    From: Mike Papais <mjp2 @ is . chrysler . com>
  • Re: Isolated box...
    From: Doug Hughes <Doug . Hughes @ Eng . Auburn . EDU>
  • Re: Firewall comparison chart???
    From: Doug Hughes <Doug . Hughes @ Eng . Auburn . EDU>
  • RE: Firewall comparison chart???
    From: Michael Brown <BROWNMK @ misf . network . com>
  • Re: port 113?
    From: nreadwin @ london . micrognosis . com (Neil Readwin)
  • Problems with Borderware without internet
    From: jim @ wvlink . mpl . com (Jim Poling)
  • Re: Dead End Concepts-Encryption
    From: gary flynn <gary @ habanero . jmu . edu>
  • RE: Web browser ports?
    From: Peter Curran <pcurran @ ticl . co . uk>
  • Firewall comparison chart???
    From: Phil Davidson <fil @ mojo . europe . dg . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: "Schlter, Olaf" <oschlueter @ mail . muc . telenet . de>
  • Proxy for X.400
    From: pc @ bim . be (Philippe Cayphas)
  • Isolated box...
    From: "Brian T. Wightman" <wightman @ sol . acs . uwosh . edu>
  • Re: your mail
    From: Rabid Wombat <wombat @ mcfeely . bsfs . org>
  • [no subject]
    From: Tham Huei Hwan <Tham . Huei . Hwan @ bass . com . my>
• Monday 12 February 1996
  • Re: Hoo Dat and sniffer log
    From: Barney Wolff <barney @ databus . com>
  • Firewall-1 Version Comparison
    From: Graham Jose <gjose @ mecx05 . colesmyer . com . au>
  • RE: Gauntlet 3.1 Packet Filter?
    From: Michael Brown <BROWNMK @ misf . network . com>
  • the Brosl Hasslacher thing
    From: Karyn Pichnarczyk <karyn @ cisco . com>
  • Re: SHTTP/SSL Proxies?
    From: Frederick M Avolio <avolio @ trusted . com>
  • Re: Gauntlet 3.1 Packet Filter?
    From: Frederick M Avolio <avolio @ trusted . com>
  • Re: SHTTP/SSL Proxies?
    From: "Angelos D. Keromytis" <kermit @ forthnet . gr>
  • Dead End Concepts-Encryption
    From: Michael Brown <BROWNMK @ misf . network . com>
  • Re: tkined and firewalls
    From: Mike Neuman <mcn @ EnGarde . com>
  • Gauntlet 3.1 Packet Filter?
    From: sengle @ hti . net (Steven W. Engle)
  • Re: Hoo Dat and sniffer log
    From: Sick Puppy <sikpuppy @ maestro . com>
  • SHTTP/SSL Proxies?
    From: Shoel Perelman <sdp4198 @ is2 . nyu . edu>
  • Harris Computer product viability.
    From: MFTemplar @ aol . com
  • Re: your mail
    From: Kent Dahlgren <kent @ trouble . WV . TEK . COM>
  • tkined and firewalls
    From: Sick Puppy <sikpuppy @ maestro . com>
  • Re: your mail
    From: Oliver Friedrichs <iceman @ MBnet . MB . CA>
  • Re: port 113?
    From: markl @ glyphic . com (Mark Lentczner)
  • Re: SQL*Net proxy?
    From: pauck @ rs3 . wmd . de (Marco Pauck)
  • Re: your mail
    From: Kent Dahlgren <kent @ trouble . WV . TEK . COM>
  • Re: I want details!!! Re: NT's TCP/IP stack
    From: Michael Morse <mmorse @ nsf . gov>
  • Re: RMON Data
    From: wayne bak <wbak @ clark . net>
  • Re: SQL*Net proxy?
    From: chris @ yacc . co . uk (Chris Davies)
  • Re: anybody know of any vulnerabilities with "echo"
    From: jon @ london . hcsc . com (Jon Shallow)
  • Re: anybody know of any vulnerabilities with "echo"
    From: Gavin Aiken <gavin @ theboard . newsquest . co . uk>
  • Re: NT Firewalls/Web Servers -Reply
    From: firewalls @ count04 . mry . scruznet . com
  • Re: anybody know of any vulnerabilities with "echo"
    From: blymn @ awadi . com . au (Brett Lymn)
  • Re: Non-company Access ??
    From: Ken Hardy <ken @ bridge . com>
  • Re: your (immature) mail
    From: Rabid Wombat <wombat @ mcfeely . bsfs . org>
• Sunday 11 February 1996
  • Re: Web browser ports?
    From: Kevin Steves <stevesk @ nsr . hp . com>
  • Re: Non-company Access ??
    From: Dale Lancaster <dlancaster @ raptor . com>
  • Re: NT Firewalls/Web Servers -Reply
    From: Dale Lancaster <dlancaster @ raptor . com>
  • Re: NT Firewalls/Web Servers -Reply
    From: Dale Lancaster <dlancaster @ raptor . com>
  • Re: NT Firewalls/Web Servers -Reply
    From: Dale Lancaster <dlancaster @ raptor . com>
  • Re: Non-company Access ??
    From: Dale Lancaster <dlancaster @ raptor . com>
  • Re: Non-company Access ??
    From: Dale Lancaster <dlancaster @ raptor . com>
  • Re: Non-company Access ??
    From: Frank Willoughby <frankw @ in . net>
  • Re: NT Firewalls/Web Servers
    From: Dale Lancaster <dlancaster @ raptor . com>
  • Re: Non-company Access ??
    From: Frank Willoughby <frankw @ in . net>
  • WARNING POSSIBLE MAIL FORGERY IN PROGRESS
    From: firewalls @ count04 . mry . scruznet . com
  • Re: Non-company Access ??
    From: robp @ anubis . network . com (Rob Peglar)
  • Re: Most Secure Unix?
    From: Rolf Weber <weber @ iez . com>
  • Re: Hoo Dat?
    From: Sick Puppy <sikpuppy @ maestro . com>
  • Re: 125 megabit infra-red
    From: blymn @ awadi . com . au (Brett Lymn)
  • RE:
    From: Russ <Russ . Cooper @ RC . Toronto . on . ca>
  • Re: Non-company Access ??
    From: peter @ nmti . com (Peter da Silva)
  • 125 megabit infra-red
    From: Mervyn Frankel <frankel @ yu1 . yu . edu>
  • Re: Most Secure Unix?
    From: spencerj @ dg-rtp . dg . com (Jon Spencer)
  • Re: Most Secure Unix?
    From: Ian Johnstone-Bryden <ianj-b @ dial . pipex . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: Brosl Hasslacher <bhass @ azazel . sdsc . edu>
  • [no subject]
    From: Brosl Hasslacher <bhass @ azazel . sdsc . edu>
• Saturday 10 February 1996
  • syslog
    From: "Joe Smith (Really!)" <joey @ gxl . woodtech . com>
  • Re: Hoo Dat?
    From: Alan Hannan <alan @ gi . net>
  • Re: Hoo Dat?
    From: firewalls @ count04 . mry . scruznet . com
  • lotsa ICMP redirects lateley??
    From: Brian Murrell <murrell @ bctel . net>
  • Re: Hoo Dat?
    From: Sick Puppy <sikpuppy @ maestro . com>
  • Re: Hoo Dat?
    From: firewalls @ count04 . mry . scruznet . com
  • Re: JAVA security problem ?
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • Re: anybody know of any vulnerabilities with "echo"
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • Re: SQL*Net proxy?
    From: fwoyach @ cais . cais . com (Frederick Woyach)
  • Dead end concepts
    From: "A. Padgett Peterson, P.E. Information Security" <PADGETT @ hobbes . orl . mmc . com>
  • Re: Non-company Access ??
    From: giff @ congress . East . Sun . COM (Wayne Gifford - Internet Commerce Group)
  • Re: SickPuppyChow 1-96, Part One
    From: Sick Puppy <sikpuppy @ maestro . com>
  • Re: Product selection
    From: jon @ london . hcsc . com (Jon Shallow)
  • Re: Non-company Access ??
    From: Rabid Wombat <wombat @ mcfeely . bsfs . org>
  • Re: JAVA security problem ?
    From: Steve Gibbons <steve @ aztech . net>
  • Re: anybody know of any vulnerabilities with "echo"
    From: "Joe Smith (Really!)" <joey @ gxl . woodtech . com>
  • Re: Non-company Access ??
    From: Mark Allyn (206) 860-9454 <allyn @ allyn . com>
• Friday 09 February 1996
  • RE: NetWare LAN Security using IP-IPX Gateway
    From: Michael Brown <BROWNMK @ misf . network . com>
  • Re: JAVA security problem ?
    From: peter @ nmti . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Strange Digests?
    From: dgameynn @ colybrand . com (David Gamey -- ITAS - Toronto )
  • Re: port 113?
    From: Jeff Fisher <jeff @ kcrg . com>
  • Re: Non-company Access ??
    From: Ken Hardy <ken @ bridge . com>
  • Subscription Request
    From: "john welby" <john_welby @ usa . racal . com>
  • New Encryption SDoftware Technology Available
    From: Walter Chek <schek @ airmail . net>
  • Re: Would anyone know how to route www.foobar.COM
    From: Scott Barman <scott @ Disclosure . COM>
  • Ultimately secure firewall --
    From: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr @ clark . net>
  • Re: Product selection
    From: peter @ nmti . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Re: JAVA security problem ?
    From: Jeff Murphy <jcmurphy @ smurfland . cit . buffalo . edu>
  • Re: JAVA security problem ?
    From: Jeff Murphy <jcmurphy @ smurfland . cit . buffalo . edu>
  • Re: Non-company Access ??
    From: bobk @ manzanita . DEV . 3Com . COM (Bob Konigsberg)
  • Re: port 113?
    From: Bob Resino <pnh1rgr @ mclo10 . med . navy . mil>
  • Web browser ports?
    From: "david r coelho" <drc @ bastion . ppt . com>
  • Re: port 113?
    From: wbunting @ ch . inri . com (Bill Bunting)
  • Would anyone know how to route www.foobar.COM
    From: "Douglas M. Todd, Jr." <doug @ fc . com>
  • Re: JAVA security problem ?
    From: Jeff Murphy <jcmurphy @ smurfland . cit . buffalo . edu>
  • Re: JAVA security problem ?
    From: Jeff Murphy <jcmurphy @ smurfland . cit . buffalo . edu>
  • Re: JAVA security problem ?
    From: Adam Jack <ajack @ corp . micrognosis . com>
  • Re: port 113?
    From: Ed Osterman <eo @ mda . ca>
  • Re: Re[2]: routing table go through firewall ?
    From: "Eliot T. Ware" <etware @ access . digex . net>
  • NetWare LAN Security using IP-IPX Gateway
    From: "Eliot T. Ware" <etware @ access . digex . net>
  • Re: Product selection
    From: jon @ london . hcsc . com (Jon Shallow)
  • port 113?
    From: Jim Legg <legg @ sun1plus . liebert . com>
  • Re: JAVA security problem ?
    From: peterg @ mccaw-stg . com (Peter Gregory)
  • Re: JAVA security problem ?
    From: mdr @ vodka . sse . att . com
  • firewall product evaluation
    From: Alfred Grahame Leach <aleach @ cc . gatech . edu>
  • Re: Non-company Access ??
    From: Frank Willoughby <frankw @ in . net>
  • Re: JAVA security problem ?
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • Re: JAVA security problem ?
    From: Ken Hardy <ken @ bridge . com>
  • Re: JAVA security problem ?
    From: Adam Jack <ajack @ corp . micrognosis . com>
  • Would anyone know how to route www.foobar.com
    From: "Douglas M. Todd, Jr." <doug @ fc . com>
  • Re: Re[2]: routing table go through firewall ?
    From: Rabid Wombat <wombat @ mcfeely . bsfs . org>
  • Comprehensive FAQ on f-wall
    From: "Ashley Miller" <Ashley_Miller @ cpqm . saic . com>
  • RE: Non-company Access ??
    From: Rabid Wombat <wombat @ mcfeely . bsfs . org>
  • Re: JAVA security problem ?
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • security checks
    From: "Donna O'Connell" <Donna_O'Connell . NIRC @ mailgate . bigyellow . com>
  • Advice please - doing without an inner router on a secured subnet
    From: Danny Cox <dannyc @ gmap . leeds . ac . uk>
• Thursday 08 February 1996
  • SickPuppyChow 1-96 Part Six Section Four
    From: Sick Puppy <sikpuppy @ maestro . com>
  • SickPuppyChow 1-96, Part One
    From: Sick Puppy <sikpuppy @ maestro . com>
  • Re[2]: routing table go through firewall ?
    From: Inverardi @ abacus . ch (Remo Inverardi)
  • Non-company Access ??
    From: Dick_Wall @ stratus . com
  • Re: Most Secure Unix?
    From: D . Thomas @ vthrc . uq . edu . au (Danny Thomas)
  • Re: anybody know of any vulnerabilities with "echo"
    From: Michael Baumann <baumann @ proton . llumc . edu>
  • RPC through a firewall
    From: RUNTERD @ MAIL . STATE . WI . US
  • Re: Product selection
    From: peter @ nmti . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Re: IP kernel variable of Solaris
    From: Jose Roberto Menezes Monteiro <monteiro @ dcc . unicamp . br>
  • Re: anybody know of any vulnerabilities with "echo"
    From: Frank Willoughby <frankw @ in . net>
  • Re: Firewalls-Digest V5 #90
    From: "Lehrer, Neil" <nlehrer @ usia . gov>
  • Re: firewalls-digest V1 #1
    From: "Lehrer, Neil" <nlehrer @ usia . gov>
  • Hoo Dat?
    From: Sick Puppy <sikpuppy @ maestro . com>
  • Re: Global broadcasts
    From: Steve Kennedy <steve @ gbnet . org>
  • Re: The "ULTIMATELY secure firewall" web page
    From: Mike Malik -- Dover DE <mam @ ssds . com>
  • Re: Strange protoc
    From: peter @ nmti . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Re: Firewall, yes, but policy first !
    From: "Edward J.M. Carley Jr." <ejc @ gumby . bridgewater . ne . hcc . com>
  • Re: Mandatory protection (was: product selection)
    From: Rick Smith <smith @ sctc . com>
  • Re: Most Secure Unix?
    From: Stephen Schaefer - Network Computing Solutions <stephen . schaefer @ imonics . com>
  • RE: ipx routing
    From: Craig McLellan <mclelcl @ onto . network . com>
  • Re: 0.0.0.0 address on LAN
    From: "Joe Smith (Really!)" <joey @ gxl . woodtech . com>
  • Re: routing table go through firewall ?
    From: "Michael Langdon" <mlangdon @ rpm . com>
  • Re: NT Firewalls/Web Servers
    From: "Scott Deshaies" <sdeshaies @ vanguard . hmp . com>
  • RE: Dial-out risks
    From: "HEROLD.BECKY" <Herold . Becky @ principal . com>
  • Re: IP kernel variable of Solaris
    From: Keesje Duarte Pouw <duarte @ dcc . unicamp . br>
  • Re: 0.0.0.0 address on LAN
    From: Adam Prato <adamp @ mickey . ovid . com>
  • Unix hack
    From: Sick Puppy <sikpuppy @ maestro . com>
  • Re: NT's TCP/IP stack + NetManage NEWT conflict. -Reply
    From: NetSurfer <netsurf @ pixi . com>
  • Re: I want details!!! Re: NT's TCP/IP stack
    From: Chris Osborn <cosborn @ bbnplanet . com>
  • Risk for session hijacknig
    From: Per Josefsson <per . josefsson @ mailbox . postnet . se>
  • RE: NT's TCP/IP stack
    From: Chris Woods <cjwoods @ Paladin . COM>
  • Re: DNS for NT
    From: Torsten Sturm <tnsturm @ cip . informatik . uni-erlangen . de>
  • Re: Global broadcasts
    From: Chris Woods <cjwoods @ Paladin . COM>
  • I want details!!! Re: NT's TCP/IP stack
    From: Warren Moore <warren . moore @ cbis . com>
  • Re: anybody know of any vulnerabilities with "echo"
    From: James R Grinter <jrg @ gbnet . net>
  • Security Policies Made Easy
    From: Warren Moore <warren . moore @ cbis . com>
  • Re: routing table go through firewall ?
    From: F . Wetzels @ amc . uva . nl
  • Re: Most Secure Unix?
    From: Rolf Weber <weber @ iez . com>
  • The "ULTIMATELY secure firewall" web page
    From: Mark Newton <newton @ cleese . apana . org . au>
  • Re: fw-1 and smapd
    From: David Kovar <kovar @ nda . com>
  • Re: Firewalls Product Comparison
    From: Dick Brooks <dick @ tech-comm . com>
• Wednesday 07 February 1996
  • Re: Most Secure Unix?
    From: spencerj @ dg-rtp . dg . com (Jon Spencer)
  • Re: Mazama Packet Filter: Misleading advertising
    From: Larry Stelmat <lstelmat @ mazama . com>
  • fw-1 and smapd
    From: "Lehrer, Neil" <nlehrer @ usia . gov>
  • RMON Data
    From: LLOYD HARTE <LHARTE @ oceanspray . com>
  • Re: NT's TCP/IP stack + NetManage NEWT conflict. -Reply
    From: Ron DuFresne <dufresne @ winternet . com>
  • Firewalls Product Comparison
    From: pcuser @ slip67-241 . ny . us . ibm . net
  • Re: firewalls, email, and dns
    From: "Richard L. Snow" <rich @ aoainc . com>
  • Re: Survey
    From: Sten Drescher <stend @ grendel . texas . net>
  • Firewall
    From: Jesse Gambetti <JGambetti @ msmail . radisys . com>
  • Dial-out risks
    From: "HEROLD.BECKY" <Herold . Becky @ principal . com>
  • Re: Cost of Address Translation systems
    From: firewalls @ count04 . mry . scruznet . com
  • Re: Cost of Address Translation systems
    From: Dave Mischler <mischler @ eagle . wd . cubic . com>
  • Re: NT Firewalls/Web Servers
    From: long-morrow @ CS . YALE . EDU
  • I want details!!! Re: NT's TCP/IP stack
    From: Robert Dana <bob @ worldcom . com>
  • Cost of Address Translation systems
    From: bobk @ manzanita . DEV . 3Com . COM (Bob Konigsberg)
  • Re: User level firewall / proxy authentication
    From: Bob Bosen <bbosen @ netcom . com>
  • Re: User level firewall / proxy authentication
    From: jeromie @ garrison . com (Jeromie Jackson)
  • Firewalls Product Comparison
    From: pcuser @ slip133-140 . dc . us . ibm . net
  • Firewall, yes, but policy first !
    From: security @ crpht . lu (Bruno MAMER)
  • Re: NT's TCP/IP stack + NetManage NEWT conflict. -Reply
    From: Chris Jenkins <cjenkins @ synaxis . com>
  • NT Firewalls/Web Servers -Reply
    From: Chris Jenkins <cjenkins @ synaxis . com>
  • DNS for NT
    From: Eduardo Torres <etorres @ startel . com . ar>
  • RE: NT's TCP/IP stack
    From: Scott Barman <scott @ Disclosure . COM>
  • ipx routing
    From: "Lehrer, Neil" <nlehrer @ usia . gov>
  • Re: Survey
    From: "KM" <goertzek @ gateway . wangfed . com>
  • Re: NT's TCP/IP stack + NetManage NEWT conflict.
    From: NetSurfer <netsurf @ pixi . com>
  • Re: Most Secure Unix?
    From: Scott Barman <scott @ Disclosure . COM>
  • firewalls, email, and dns
    From: "Lehrer, Neil" <nlehrer @ usia . gov>
  • Most Secure Unix?
    From: don_tompkins @ esd . tracor . com
  • Re: User level firewall / proxy authentication
    From: zuhn @ sctc . com (david d `zoo' zuhn)
  • Re: Need a few pointers
    From: Mohammed Ali <ali @ protosoft . com>
  • NT Firewalls/Web Servers
    From: "Douglas M. Todd, Jr." <doug @ fc . com>
  • Re: NT's TCP/IP stack + NetManage NEWT conflict.
    From: "SATEESHB" <SATEESHB @ inf . com>
  • RE: NT's TCP/IP stack
    From: Russ <Russ . Cooper @ RC . Toronto . on . ca>
  • More Firewalls info (was hello:)
    From: Rabid Wombat <wombat @ mcfeely . bsfs . org>
  • hello
    From: "Raul Arturo Fuster" <rafuster @ ocean . st . usm . edu>
  • NT's TCP/IP stack
    From: jeromie @ garrison . com (Jeromie Jackson)
  • Re: User level firewall / proxy authentication
    From: Ron DuFresne <dufresne @ winternet . com>
  • User level firewall / proxy authentication
    From: Graham Jose <gjose @ mecx05 . colesmyer . com . au>
• Tuesday 06 February 1996
  • Re: Survey
    From: peter @ nmti . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Info needed
    From: pmoen @ sbnsw . com . au
  • This is a test
    From: "Raul Arturo Fuster" <rafuster @ ocean . st . usm . edu>
  • Follow up on Windows 95/NT trying to use firewall DNS
    From: Sick Puppy <sikpuppy @ maestro . com>
  • MAIL LOOP!!!
    From: Barry Anderson <bwa @ cednsw . telecom . com . au>
  • Re: Socks and Internet News
    From: Sten Drescher <stend @ grendel . texas . net>
  • Re: USE OF 'MANAGED' INTERNET CONNECTION
    From: Brad Isley <bisley @ Lanier . COM>
  • RE: RPC
    From: "Richard Giering Jr." <Richard_Giering_Jr . . @ cch . com>
  • Re: Internet-access from Novell
    From: dbuckley @ esl . tex . com (David Buckley)
  • Re: Desktop tools needed
    From: Sick Puppy <sikpuppy @ maestro . com>
  • Most Secure Unix?
    From: giff @ congress . East . Sun . COM (Wayne Gifford - Internet Commerce Group)
  • Re: telnetd
    From: joe_woolf @ MENTORG . COM (Joe Woolf)
  • Re: Novell inside IP Port?
    From: Ryan Mooney <firewalls @ pcslink . com>
  • Re: WWW Proxy
    From: Ryan Mooney <firewalls @ pcslink . com>
  • Re: RPC Across a firewall?
    From: "SATEESHB" <SATEESHB @ inf . com>
  • Re: SQL*Net proxy?
    From: gary flynn <gary @ habanero . jmu . edu>
  • Re: telnetd
    From: Steven Johnson - Hukd on Fonix <johnson @ bayflash . stpt . usf . edu>
  • Re: router performance
    From: Adam Shostack <adam @ bwh . harvard . edu>
  • Re: Need a few pointers
    From: Matts Kallioniemi <matts @ pi . se>
  • planet gateway firewall
    From: md @ adv . sbc . sony . co . jp (Mark Dudley)
  • Re: Survey
    From: "Kenneth J. Stephens" <janken @ rust . net>
  • PC Week Article on Network Security Scanners
    From: Christopher Klaus <cklaus @ iss . net>
  • Some Information
    From: Carolina Elortegui <celort @ kuma . ciens . ucv . ve>
  • Re: telnetd
    From: Mohammed Ali <ali @ protosoft . com>
  • Firewalls Product Comparison
    From: pcuser @ slip133-171 . dc . us . ibm . net
  • Socks and Internet News
    From: smithj @ rd . qms . com (John Smith)
  • telnetd
    From: Prakash N Purushotham <prakashp @ mindware . soft . net>
  • More SESAME
    From: "Kare Presttun" <Kare . Presttun @ ansf . alcatel . fr>
  • Re: Need a few pointers
    From: Chris Woods <cjwoods @ Paladin . COM>
  • Re: Mazama Packet Filter: Misleading advertising
    From: Ian Miller <firewalls @ bifroest . demon . co . uk>
  • Re: www proxies
    From: "Alan Olsen" <alano @ teleport . com>
  • Re: Need a few pointers
    From: Rabid Wombat <wombat @ mcfeely . bsfs . org>
  • problem with thttpd on solaris 2.x
    From: chris @ sandpiper . com (Chris Newton)
  • Re: RPC Across a firewall?
    From: Jas (Matthew K) <matt @ maverick . itd . uts . edu . au>
  • Re: RPC Across a firewall?
    From: Doug Hughes <Doug . Hughes @ Eng . Auburn . EDU>
• Monday 05 February 1996
  • Re: Need a few pointers
    From: "Richard L. Snow" <rich @ aoainc . com>
  • Re: RPC Across a firewall?
    From: Frank Willoughby <frankw @ in . net>
  • Re: CISCO Access Server Configuration
    From: "Jim Thompson" <jim @ SmallWorks . COM>
  • www proxies
    From: rex @ staff . cs . su . oz . au (Rex di Bona)
  • Re: Need a few pointers
    From: Sick Puppy <sikpuppy @ maestro . com>
  • Re: slip/ppp sniffing
    From: Mike Neuman <mcn @ EnGarde . com>
  • SQL*Net proxy?
    From: Tom Cooper <asec @ access . digex . net>
  • Re: Need a few pointers
    From: "KM" <goertzek @ gateway . wangfed . com>
  • Re: Survey
    From: "KM" <goertzek @ gateway . wangfed . com>
  • Re: Mandatory protection (was: product selection)
    From: "KM" <goertzek @ gateway . wangfed . com>
  • Re: What are MLS and TE?
    From: "KM" <goertzek @ gateway . wangfed . com>
  • Re: What are MLS and TE?
    From: "KM" <goertzek @ gateway . wangfed . com>
  • Novell inside IP Port?
    From: Peter Morrissey <ppmorris @ syr . edu>
  • Re: SSL and S-HTTP Proxy Status (as of 11 January 1996)
    From: "william.wells" <william . wells @ damark . com>
  • CISCO Access Server Configuration
    From: Juan Carlos Machado <juank @ ciat . cgiar . org>
  • Re: Echo Vunerebility
    From: Andrew Cameron <andrew @ andy . alt . za>
  • RPC Across a firewall?
    From: "Richard Giering Jr." <Richard_Giering_Jr . . @ cch . com>
  • Re: Need a few pointers
    From: sandy bryant <sandy @ kesmai . com>
  • Re: WWW Proxy
    From: Chris Woods <cjwoods @ Paladin . COM>
  • IP kernel variable of Solaris
    From: Jose Roberto Menezes Monteiro <monteiro @ dcc . unicamp . br>
  • Need a few pointers
    From: Sick Puppy <sikpuppy @ maestro . com>
  • slip/ppp sniffing
    From: Chris Eastman <chris @ cwi . net>
  • Re[2]: PC based sniffer
    From: Brian Murrell <murrell @ bctel . net>
  • Re: PC based sniffer
    From: William Bradley Paris (Volt Comp) <a-billp @ microsoft . com>
  • RE: PC based sniffer
    From: Chris Kostick <ckostick @ csc . com>
  • WWW Proxy
    From: gblolmxb @ ibmmail . com
  • Re: Firewall API's
    From: Frederick M Avolio <avolio @ trusted . com>
  • Re: PC based sniffer
    From: Chris Eastman <chris @ cwi . net>
  • SESAME
    From: "Kare Presttun" <Kare . Presttun @ ansf . alcatel . fr>
  • I-Phone - safe? What ports?
    From: davek @ melupl . melita . com (Dave Kennedy)
  • Mazama Packet Filter: Misleading advertising
    From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
  • Re: NFS services and firewalls
    From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
  • Re: Firewall API's
    From: bressen @ hks . net (Andrew K. Bressen)
  • Re: Mandatory protection (was: product selection)
    From: Rick Smith <smith @ sctc . com>
  • Re: Securing an anonymous ftp acces
    From: eric @ cc . uq . oz . au (Eric Halil)
  • RE: Negative impact of Windows 95 on firewall performance
    From: Mike Culver <mculver @ ncelec . com>
• Sunday 04 February 1996
  • Re: PC based sniffer
    From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: Jamison Gulden <jamison @ ncic . net>
  • Re: anybody know of any vulnerabilities with "echo"
    From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
  • RE: Negative impact of Windows 95 on firewall performance
    From: Russ <Russ . Cooper @ RC . Toronto . on . ca>
  • NFS services and firewalls
    From: rex @ staff . cs . su . oz . au (Rex di Bona)
  • FW: Windows 95 clobbering firewall? -Reply
    From: Matthew Thompson <Mthomps1 @ manukau . govt . nz>
  • Re: PC based sniffer
    From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
  • anybody know of any vulnerabilities with "echo"
    From: brian @ ilinx . ilinx . com (Brian J. Murrell)
  • Re: PC based sniffer
    From: Tony Ferro <tferro @ raptor . com>
  • CERN httpd man page
    From: Wally the Craw Wurm <jlundin @ indiana . edu>
  • RE: Negative impact of Windows 95 on firewall performance
    From: Sick Puppy <sikpuppy @ maestro . com>
  • RE: Negative impact of Windows 95 on firewall performance
    From: "Russ . Cooper @ RC . Toronto . on . ca" <Russ . Cooper @ RC . Toronto . on . ca>
  • Re: Negative impact of Windows 95 on firewall performance
    From: Mike Culver <mculver @ ncelec . com>
  • RE: Negative impact of Windows 95 on firewall performance
    From: Ed Woodrick <ewoodrick @ ed-com . com>
  • Negative impact of Windows 95 on firewall performance
    From: Sick Puppy <sikpuppy @ maestro . com>
  • H-H-H-H-He's backkkkk
    From: "A. Padgett Peterson, P.E. Information Security" <PADGETT @ hobbes . orl . mmc . com>
• Saturday 03 February 1996
  • Re: Help with Sun-OS/Raptor Firewall
    From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
  • CNN on Mitnick
    From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
  • Re: Help with Sun-OS/Raptor Firewall
    From: Alan Hannan <alan @ gi . net>
  • Re: Mandatory protection (was: product selection)
    From: jeromie @ garrison . com (Jeromie Jackson)
  • I am looking for someone in the Mass Area who is an expert
    From: "Douglas M. Todd, Jr." <doug @ fc . com>
  • Re: Survey
    From: Frank Willoughby <frankw @ in . net>
  • Re: Most Secure Unix?
    From: Ian Johnstone-Bryden <ianj-b @ dial . pipex . com>
  • Re: Does SMTP allow security breaches.
    From: "Rick Murphy" <rick @ trusted . com>
  • Re: SSL and S-HTTP Proxy Status (as of 11 January 1996)
    From: George Mullins <george @ wicked . neato . org>
  • Re: CHAP Authentication
    From: Bob Bosen <bbosen @ netcom . com>
• Friday 02 February 1996
  • Re: Does SMTP allow security breaches.
    From: Brent @ GreatCircle . COM (Brent Chapman)
  • Re: Scanning from afar...
    From: Shawn Steele <shawn @ aob . org>
  • Survey
    From: "Dan Vukelich" <Dan_Vukelich @ qmgateib . mitre . org>
  • proxy smtp
    From: Chris Eastman <chris @ cwi . net>
  • Help with Sun-OS/Raptor Firewall
    From: jtriana @ adp-es . com (Jorge Triana)
  • CHAP Authentication
    From: nicholscs @ agedwards . com (Nichols,Christopher)
  • Re: Mandatory protection (was: product selection)
    From: Ian Johnstone-Bryden <ianj-b @ dial . pipex . com>
  • Intrustion Detection References for all
    From: mdr @ vodka . sse . att . com
  • Re: Scanning from afar
    From: Sick Puppy <sikpuppy @ maestro . com>
  • Re: X#.hosts in /etc directory
    From: Philip Guenther <guenther @ gac . edu>
  • Firewall API's
    From: williams @ va . arca . com (Jeff Williams)
  • Re: Scanning from afar...
    From: bret @ real . com (Bret McDanel)
  • NFS services and firewalls
    From: igood @ mprgate . mpr . ca (Ian Good)
  • Re: Mandatory protection (was: product selection)
    From: Charles Watt <watt @ sware . com>
  • Re: Mandatory protection (was: product selection)
    From: jgt10 @ amdahl . com (John G. Thompson)
  • Re: NIS+
    From: "Mikolaj J. Habryn" <dichro @ tartarus . uwa . edu . au>
  • Re: How secure can a screened host be?
    From: Bill Stout <bstout @ osc . hitachi . com>
  • Re: Internet-access from Nov
    From: "Dan Vukelich" <Dan_Vukelich @ qmgateib . mitre . org>
  • Re: Most Secure Unix?
    From: jon @ london . hcsc . com (Jon Shallow)
  • Re: Windows 95 clobbering firewall?
    From: Mark_W_Loveless @ smtp . bnr . com
  • Re: Scanning from afar...
    From: Mark_W_Loveless @ smtp . bnr . com
  • Re[2]: firewall
    From: "MCARDLE MARK" <MMCARDLE @ dis . n-i . nhs . uk>
  • FW: Windows 95 clobbering firewall?
    From: "Russ . Cooper @ RC . Toronto . on . ca" <Russ . Cooper @ RC . Toronto . on . ca>
  • Re: Windows 95 clobbering firewall?
    From: Barney Wolff <barney @ databus . com>
  • Internet-access from Novell (reply)
    From: "Elbert LaGrew" <elbert . lagrew @ sunny . health . state . mn . us>
  • X#.hosts in /etc directory
    From: Prakash N Purushotham <prakashp @ mindware . soft . net>
  • HyperNews
    From: wojtek @ solaris . tryc . on . ca (Wojciech Tryc)
  • Re: Windows 95 clobbering firewall?
    From: Tim Keanini <blast @ crl . com>
  • Re: Mandatory protection (was: product selection)
    From: Rick Smith <smith @ sctc . com>
• Thursday 01 February 1996
  • Re: Mandatory protection (was: product selection)
    From: Rick Smith <smith @ sctc . com>
  • Re: Mandatory protection (was: product selection)
    From: jeromie @ garrison . com (Jeromie Jackson)
  • Re: Fault Tolerant Firewall
    From: hle @ qualix . com (Hung Le)
  • Re: What are MLS and TE?
    From: thompson jeffrey w <jwthomp @ cs . uiuc . edu>
  • Re: Internet-access from Novell
    From: Jas (Matthew K) <matt @ maverick . itd . uts . edu . au>
  • Re: NIS+
    From: Jas (Matthew K) <matt @ maverick . itd . uts . edu . au>
  • Re: What are MLS and TE?
    From: Leonard Miyata <leonard @ geminisecure . com>
  • Re: Scanning from afar...
    From: wbunting @ ch . inri . com (Bill Bunting)
  • Windows 95 clobbering firewall?
    From: Sick Puppy <sikpuppy @ maestro . com>
  • Re: Securing an anonymous ftp acces
    From: Brad VanOrden <bvvanor @ rssi . rssi . com>
  • Scanning from afar...
    From: netmgr02 @ cbe . ab . ca (Glen Larwill)
  • Re: Most Secure Unix?
    From: Leroy Lacy <leroyl @ netcom . com>
  • Re: Local Computer Network CFP...
    From: "g.kessler" <kumquat @ hill . com>
  • Re: Mandatory protection (was: product selection)
    From: Charles Watt <watt @ sware . com>
  • Re: NIS+
    From: Scott Barman <scott @ Disclosure . COM>
  • Re: Internet-access from Novell
    From: Scott Barman <scott @ Disclosure . COM>
  • Re: Lotus Notes replication
    From: dan @ filoli . com (Dan Curry)
  • RE: Internet-access from Novell
    From: Chris Woods <cjwoods @ paladin . com>
  • Thanks for the helful Intrusion Detection refs
    From: mdr @ vodka . sse . att . com
  • Re: Mandatory protection (was: product selection)
    From: mdr @ vodka . sse . att . com
  • Re: how secure is NIS
    From: Doug Hughes <Doug . Hughes @ Eng . Auburn . EDU>
  • Re: Internet-access from Novell
    From: Chris Woods <cjwoods @ paladin . com>
  • What are MLS and TE?
    From: Jane Ferreira Cunha <jane @ gwosi . telesc . gov . br>
  • Re: Internet-access from Novell
    From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
  • Re: Internet-access from Novell
    From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
  • RE: Internet-access from Novell
    From: Ed Woodrick <ewoodrick @ ed-com . com>
  • NIS+
    From: "Finn T Andersen" <fina @ novo . dk>
  • Re: Internet-access from Novell
    From: bressen @ hks . net (Andrew K. Bressen)
  • Re: Sequence Number Attacks
    From: jsanchez @ esegi . es (Julio Sanchez)
  • Re: Internet-access from Novell
    From: bressen @ hks . net (Andrew K. Bressen)
  • Re: how secure is NIS
    From: Julio Sanchez <jsanchez @ gmv . es>
  • Securing an anonymous ftp acces
    From: Mondher Maddouri <maddouri @ ensi . rnrt . tn>
  • Re: Internet-access from Novell
    From: bressen @ hks . net (Andrew K. Bressen)
  • Card driver, thanks
    From: Mondher Maddouri <maddouri @ ensi . rnrt . tn>
  • [no subject]
    From: "MCARDLE MARK" <MMCARDLE @ dis . n-i . nhs . uk>

Other Indexes

• Previous month (January 1996)
• Next month (March 1996)
• This month, indexed by thread