Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(February 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Performance on a Linux box
From: Luis M Ibarra <mibarra @ galois . dgaesc . unam . mx>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 16:20:31 -0600 (CST)
To: Jim Shankland <jas @ flyingfox . COM>
Cc: firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM, sdp4198 @ is2 . nyu . edu
In-reply-to: <199602192002 . MAA27405 @ saguaro . flyingfox . com>

On Mon, 19 Feb 1996, Jim Shankland wrote:
> Shoel Perelman <sdp4198 @
 is2 .
 nyu .
 edu> writes:
> > I have found that you CANNOT use a 3COM card in conjuction with
> > another NIC!  I struggled with two 3COM 509 cards for an hour or

> Since this is far afield from firewalls, I will simply note that
> this is not my experience.  I've happily used 4 3C509's in a box
> running both Linux and FreeBSD.

	This is more related to a Linux list but let me and a 
	couple of lines.
		
	I'm Using 2*3c509 NIC's in a Linux box, just be sure to add
	an append line to your lilo.conf. with the correct addresses 
	of your cards. (mine's look like: append="ether Y,XXX,eth0 ether 
	Z,WWW,eth1". Y,XXX,Z,WWW are of course the irqs and io addrss ).

	Saludos!   

--
Luis M. Ibarra <mibarra @
 galois .
 dgaesc .
 unam .
 mx>
UNAM, DGAE.




References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: traceroute
From: Arley Carter <ac @ hawk . twinds . com>
Next: Workstations with Network and dial up PPP, Security Risks?
From: "Lachlan Mann" <docloc @ msn . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Performance on a Linux box
From: Jim Shankland <jas @ flyingfox . COM>
Next: Re(2): port 113?
From: XINCLXFirewalls-ml @ scet . org . uk (Firewalls-ml Conference @ scet.org.uk)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com