Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(February 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Firewalls as we know them are dead meat ?? (Long)
From: peter @ nmti . com (Peter da Silva)
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 12:22:56 -0600 (CST)
To: johnd @ internet . netway . co . nz
Cc: firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <9601238250 . AA825045291 @ internet . netway . co . nz> from "johnd @ internet . netway . co . nz" at Feb 23, 96 03:07:30 pm

>      However, since the proxy application must be taught each application, 
>      it may be very limited in the number of users it can support.  
>      Clearly, new applications may not be introduced to the LAN users on a 
>      timely basis.

>      By contrast, Instant Internet allows IPX workstations on your local 
>      LAN running IP to access the Internet without any IP traffic traveling 
>      between the Internet and the local IP LAN.

Two possibilities:

	1. It's running its own proxies, with all the disadvantages
	   listed above.

	2. It's tunneling IP over IPX. This is exactly equivalent to
	   giving each user a modem and a SLIP connection, no? I think
	   this option has been quite thoroughly discussed in this list.

Is there some "3" I'm missing?


Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: CERN HTTPD Proxy Rules
From: Matt Holdrege <matt @ hsa . com>
Next: Re: firewall backup ? (fwd)
From: gvilla @ minerva1 . bull . it (Guido Villa)
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Firewalls as we know them are dead meat ?? (Long)
From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
Next: Re: Firewalls as we know them are dead meat ?? (Long)
From: "Lack Mr G M" <gml4410 @ ggr . co . uk>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com