Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(March 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: RFC 1597 and 10/8 addresses
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 1996 15:36:20 -0500
To: Yakov Rekhter <yakov @ cisco . com>
Cc: Firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM, yakov @ cisco . com

At 06:58 AM 3/3/96 -0800, Yakov Rekhter wrote:

>> 
>> One new item RFC-1918 does mention is the use of 'application layer gateways'
>,
>> such as NAT devices, to 'hide' the use of private Internet address space.
>
>Another difference is that RFC1918 has the status of  BCP (Best Current 
>Practices), while RFC1597 is just Informational.
>
>Yakov.
>

Good point.  :-)

- paul


--
Paul Ferguson                                           ||        ||
Consulting Engineering                                  ||        ||
Reston, Virginia   USA                                 ||||      ||||
tel: +1.703.716.9538                               ..:||||||:..:||||||:..
e-mail: pferguso @
 cisco .
 com                         c i s c o S y s t e m s


Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Eternal war: gateway versus filtering
From: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr @ clark . net>
Next: Re: IP/IPX firewall
From: hcb @ clark . net (Howard C. Berkowitz)
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: RFC 1597 and 10/8 addresses
From: Yakov Rekhter <yakov @ cisco . com>
Next: [no subject]
From: Greag Johnson <greagj @ avicom . net>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com