Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(March 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Watchdog
From: peter @ nmti . com (Peter da Silva)
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 08:31:42 -0600 (CST)
To: avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au (Darren Reed)
Cc: Mario . Peschel @ mch . sni . de, Firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <199603211241 . EAA20284 @ miles . greatcircle . com> from "Darren Reed" at Mar 21, 96 11:41:51 pm

> > This means that the program (or whatever) should test both a terminal's
> > access and modification time before logging a user off.
> > The last interaction with the terminal would be the most 
> > recent of the two times.

> If a user doesn't want to be seen as being idle then you're probably going to
> have to use snoop/tcpdump/ttywatcher to work out if they are or aren't.

If a user is running a program to avoid an idle timeout that's a people
problem, not a technical one. Address it on that level.


References:
  • Re: Watchdog
    From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
Indexed By Date Previous: Xyplex 3000 series as a component of a firewall.
From: peter @ nmti . com (Peter da Silva)
Next: re: bank transactions
From: "A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security" <PADGETT @ hobbes . orl . mmc . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Watchdog
From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
Next: Re: Watchdog
From: pmoen @ sbnsw . com . au

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com