Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(March 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Raptor Product and other comparison of firewalls
From: Brien Wheeler <bwheeler @ raptor . com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 19:12:15 -0500
To: Colin Campbell <sgcccdc @ citec . qld . gov . au>
Cc: firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 22 Mar 1996 09:29:24 +1000." <199603212329 . JAA28842 @ guru . citec . qld . gov . au>

Colin Campbell writes:
> My mailer thinks Brien Wheeler said:
> 
> So what configuration was used to obtain the great results from "the test"?
> Was it pre-version 3.0 with a generic service passer or was it version 3.0
> with the http proxy?

We used v3.0 with the HTTP proxy.  All firewall daemons were running, and
all firewall event logging (connection startup, connection teardown, etc.)
was performed.  Real-time notifications were not configured because this is
a capability not supported by many of the firewalls that were tested.  This
is how many of our customers configure the firewall for use in their high-
traffic environments.

     Brien Wheeler
     Software Engineer
     Raptor Systems, Inc.



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: JAVA
From: Kevin Riggs <Kevin . Riggs @ POBox . com>
Next: Re: Dos based Firewalls
From: mdr @ vodka . sse . att . com
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Raptor Product and other comparison of firewalls
From: Colin Campbell <sgcccdc @ citec . qld . gov . au>
Next: RE: BoS: Netscape2.0 sends mail to the world without authority
From: Tim Linnanvirta <tim @ clinet . fi>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com