Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(March 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Firewall organizational opinions?
From: Scott Barman <scott @ di2 . disclosure . com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 1996 10:27:14 -0500 (EST)
To: Greg Skinner <gds @ best . com>
Cc: firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <199603222307 . PAA00870 @ shellx . best . com>

On Fri, 22 Mar 1996, Greg Skinner wrote:

> I agree that the security folks need to own responsibility for the
> firewalls, but I also think they need to work in conjunction with the
> networking folks, since firewalls are a part of an enterprise's
> connectivity infrastructure.  If the firewalls or other networking
> components are Unix based, they should also work in conjunction with
> Unix people as is appropriate.

Part of the problem with this scenario is that in some cases, this may
be the only Unix box involved.  The rest of the company maybe something
like Novell-based.  Have you ever tried to get a Novell CNE to learn
anything but Novell?  Let's put it this way, I would rather work on
making Java safe than try to "convert" a CNE!!  :-)

scott barman
--
scott barman                  DISCLAIMER: I speak to anyone who will listen,
scott @
 disclosure .
 com                      and I speak only for myself.
barman @
 ix .
 netcom .
 com


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: DOS based firewalls: Hancock's Reply
From: mdr @ vodka . sse . att . com
Next: Re: Java
From: Scott Barman <scott @ di2 . disclosure . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Firewall organizational opinions?
From: seeger @ cis . ufl . edu (F. L. Charles Seeger III)
Next: Is domain 'aol.com' protected by a sort of FW
From: savron @ world-net . sct . fr

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com