Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(April 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: RE: Bill on CKE
From: "A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security" <PADGETT @ hobbes . orl . mmc . com>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 1996 22:44:09 -0500 (EST)
To: adam @ lighthouse . homeport . org
Cc: firewalls @ greatcircle . com

>	You're forgetting the other half of the liability issue, and
>that is the requirement that keys be stored.  Using DH, users can
>exchange a key, and then throw away all the information used to
>generate a session key.  If this is done, after a conversation ends,
>it can't be read.  Forcing a key escrow scheme on top of this raises
>the possibility that a breach in your GAK scheme will make all of your
>historical traffic readable.

Am well aware of that but have business continuty & "due care" needs 
that mandate that the corporation be able to read all encrypted messages 
which originate within its boudaries unless contractual agreements preclude
or special permission is obtained (whew).

>	We can easily get to strong file and message encryption with
>local key recovery using a couple of small modifications to PGP.*

I have the production release of Viacrypt PGP version 4.0 running on
this notebook. It includes capability for a "corporate key". I just need two.

					Warmly,
						Padgett
ps Belgium ?

pps will someone tell the sique chienet that Sara is happily married (just
    saw both of them yesterday).

Indexed By Date Previous: Re: your mail - WHOM?
From: matt @ uts . edu . au
Next: Netscape Navigator and Firewalls
From: sengle @ hti . net (Steven W. Engle)
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Bill on CKE
From: Adam Shostack <adam @ homeport . org>
Next: Re: DOS based firewalls: Reply to Riggins latest
From: mdr @ vodka . sse . att . com

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com