Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(April 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Intell firewalls: more than just performance
From: Kirill Bolshakov <raven @ ssrouter . ioffe . rssi . ru>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 1996 19:58:39 +0400 (MSD)
To: Brad Isley <bisley @ Lanier . COM>
Cc: Penn Jennings <jennings @ cyberca . com>, Firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM, david_stagner @ sys1 . ic . ncs . com
In-reply-to: <199604301428 . KAA02141 @ sb . lanier . com>

On Tue, 30 Apr 1996, Brad Isley wrote:

> > Most people that I know would not run Linux in production.  SCO or Unixware
> > make much better choices.
> 
> The most reliable production Unix systems we have are running either
> Unixware, Sequent PTX, or Linux.  There are many more flavors.  We never
> boot these because of a "confused" OS.
> 
	And I've never seen FreeBSD hanging under heavy 
system-network-hd load. :)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Research Systems Software Laboratory 	|  Kirill Bolshakov		|
| Ioffe Institute		 	|  raven @
 ssrouter .
 ioffe .
 rssi .
 ru |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------





References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: location of public hosts
From: smith @ sctc . com (Rick Smith)
Next: Intel firewalls
From: fernando . cerioni @ smtp . alem . startel . com . ar
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Intell firewalls: more than just performance
From: Brad Isley <bisley @ Lanier . COM>
Next: Re: Intell firewalls: more than just performance
From: Barney Wolff <barney @ databus . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com