Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(May 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Fakemail (again)
From: Ken Hardy <ken @ bridge . com>
Date: Wed, 8 May 1996 09:24:08 -0500 (CDT)
To: Stefan Gal <sgaul @ prolog . net>
Cc: Nick Keenan <nkeenan @ gsionline . com>, firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <31908750 . 6E45 @ prolog . net>

On Wed, 8 May 1996, Stefan Gal wrote:

[snip]
> Given the fact that lawyers are particularly good at getting evidence "thrown out" 
> (regardless of whether or not they understand it), is it possible to set up a system 
> where the "logs" could be used or proven as valid evidence?
> 
> Before this thread gets out of hand, I would like to say that I am glad to
> see the interest and comments regarding the this Fakemail thread and the prior one
> that sparked my initial reply. 
[snip]

I am afraid of it getting out of hand, especially as it's not really
related to firewalls at all, except for the fact that those, like every
*other* system I have, generate logs.  This list has been too noisy
recently, IMHO.

Not that this isn't an interesting topic.  I humbly suggest that those
interested in such subjects consider joining the LACC (Legal Aspects of
Computer Crime) list hosted by Julian Assange at suburbia.net.  I think
Julian hangs around this list too; perhaps he could comment on whether
this discussion is welcome there (or has already occured.) To
subscribe, send mail to lacc-request @
 suburbia .
 net with the body of:
subscribe lacc

--
KH


Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Normal Firewall, anyone ?
From: Ken Hardy <ken @ bridge . com>
Next: Re: gauntlet - TN3270 proxy?
From: oemaster @ dal . mobil . com (oscar masters)
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Fakemail (again)
From: Stefan Gal <sgaul @ prolog . net>
Next: Re: Fakemail (again)
From: Stefan Gal <sgaul @ prolog . net>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com