Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(May 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Firewalls-Digest V5 #317
From: Steven Bellovin <smb @ research . att . com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 1996 22:51:19 -0400
To: Firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
Cc: Shawn Steele <shawn @ aob . org>

	 Does anyone know how the wiretap laws affect 'net traffic?  (I assume
	 they could get a warrant to tap someone's communications and I also
	 assume that some ISPs may retain the right to tap their clients traffic
	 if they suspect a problem.)
	 
	 Does it matter if the connection was instigated with a telephone line?
	 (i.e: conforming to whatever traditional wiretap laws or whatever.)

Bill Cheswick and I devoted much of a chapter to these questions in our
firewall book.  The U.S. Federal statutes are online; see

	http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/ch119.html
	http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/ch121.html

for the text.

Briefly, though, the ECPA extended wiretap law to cover computer
communications under many circumstances.  The presence or absence of
a phone line is irrelevant.  The provisions for a warrant do apply.
Internal corporate communications may or may not be covered; the law
mostly applies to external services.  Communications companies may
use wiretaps to protect their own assets, but they're not allowed
to engage in random monitoring of content.

State law may add additional restrictions, and non-U.S. law may be
completely different.

		--Steve Bellovin

Indexed By Date Previous: Re: IPv6 vs. Firewalls
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
Next: Re: info on firewalls
From: mailing list firewalls <gjb_fw @ adminfw . ort . fr>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Thanks for Macintosh Firewall Help!
From: kgmlists @ 3rdmill . com (Karl Mitze)
Next: [Q] Firewall/Security solutions for X.400
From: ts @ infodirekt . de (Thomas Schreiber)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com