Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(May 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Performance testing RFC 1944.
From: Adam Safier <asafier @ csc . com>
Organization: Computer Sciences Corp.
Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 17:30:25 -0700
To: firewalls @ greatcircle . com
Reply-to: asafier @ csc . com

Just thought this would be of interest to the firewalls group interested 
in firewall performance testing.   It doesn't address firewalls 
specifically but is a good reference and may even have some 
applicability.  I know what I'm reading on the toilet this weekend (The 
best place for peace and [relative] quiet :).   The URL works.

RFC Editor wrote:
> 
> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
> 
>         RFC 1944:
> 
>         Title:      Benchmarking Methodology for Network Interconnect
>                     Devices
>         Author:     S. Bradner & J. McQuaid
>         Date:       May 1996
>         Mailbox:    sob @
 harvard .
 edu, jmcquaid @
 baynetworks .
 com
>         Pages:      30
>         Characters: 66,061
>         Updates/Obsoletes:  none
> 
>         URL:        ftp://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfc1944.txt
> 
> This document discusses and defines a number of tests that may be used
> to describe the performance characteristics of a network
> interconnecting device.  In addition to defining the tests this
> document also describes specific formats for reporting the results of
> the tests.  Appendix A lists the tests and conditions that we believe
> should be included for specific cases and gives additional information
> about testing practices.  Appendix B is a reference listing of maximum
> frame rates to be used with specific frame sizes on various media and
> Appendix C gives some examples of frame formats to be used in testing.
> This RFC is the product of the Benchmarking Methodology Working Group
> of the IETF.
> 
> This memo provides information for the Internet community.  This memo
> does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.  Distribution of
> this memo is unlimited.
> 
> This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST list.
> Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF distribution list
> should be sent to IETF-REQUEST @
 CNRI .
 RESTON .
 VA .
 US .
   Requests to be
> added to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list should
> be sent to RFC-DIST-REQUEST @
 ISI .
 EDU .
 
> 
> Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by sending
> an EMAIL message to rfc-info @
 ISI .
 EDU with the message body
> help: ways_to_get_rfcs.  For example:
> 
>         To: rfc-info @
 ISI .
 EDU
>         Subject: getting rfcs
> 
>         help: ways_to_get_rfcs
> 
> Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
> author of the RFC in question, or to admin @
 DS .
 INTERNIC .
 NET .
   Unless
> specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
> unlimited distribution.
> 
> Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to
> RFC-EDITOR @
 ISI .
 EDU .
   Please consult RFC 1543, Instructions to RFC
> Authors, for further information.
> 
> Joyce K. Reynolds
> USC/Information Sciences Institute
> 
> ...
> 
> Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant Mail Reader
> implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version
> of the RFCs.
> 
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Content-Type: text/plain
> Content-ID: <960517094846 .
 RFC @
 ISI .
 EDU>
> 
> SEND /rfc/rfc1944.txt
> 
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Content-Type: text/plain
> Content-ID: <960517094846 .
 RFC @
 ISI .
 EDU>

-- 


Adam Safier
CSC-SED-Infosec
asafier @
 csc .
 com

"Oh No!  You did exactly what I told you to do!"
- Cartoon caption, author unknown (but I'm looking. :)

The above are my own opinions, 
and I'm proud to live in a country where I'm free to express them!


Follow-Ups:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: LPD through firewall
From: long-morrow @ CS . YALE . EDU
Next: Re: Security comfort (DOJ, FBI, etc)
From: Michael Dillon <michael @ memra . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Mailloop Alert
From: "Greg Clark" <greg @ cplabs . com>
Next: Re: Performance testing RFC 1944.
From: Michael Dillon <michael @ memra . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com