Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(May 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: FW: Text v. GUI for Security Software
From: eckes <ecki @ lina . inka . de>
Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 03:25:14 +0200 (MET DST)
To: Russ @ RC . Toronto . on . ca (Russ)
Cc: scott @ di2 . disclosure . com, firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <01BB468B . E6EE5C80 @ rwcooper . rc . toronto . on . ca> from "Russ" at May 20, 96 08:35:34 pm
Organisation: private Linux Site, Karlsruhe, Germany

Hello,

> As for the SMB protocols, remote administration actually is done over RPC, 
> so you really need to block TCP 135 (RPC Locator Service) more than the 
> 137-139 range.

And how are the Connections authentificated? Are they encrypted? Or is the
only secure thing about the Remote Access the Passoword (proably tramsited
in cleartext?)

Greetings
Bernd
-- 
  (OO)      -- Bernd_Eckenfels @
 Wittumstrasse13 .
 76646Bruchsal .
 de --
 ( .. )  ecki @
 lina .
 {inka .
 de,ka.sub.org}  http://home.pages.de/~eckes/
  o--o     *plush*  2048/93600EFD  eckes @
 irc  +4972573817  *plush*
(O____O)       If privacy is outlawed only Outlaws have privacy


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: RE: FW: Text v. GUI for Security Software
From: Russ <Russ @ RC . Toronto . on . ca>
Next: Re: X.400 through Firewalls
From: girsch @ marben . com (Arnaud Girsch)
Indexed By Thread Previous: RE: FW: Text v. GUI for Security Software
From: Russ <Russ @ RC . Toronto . on . ca>
Next: RE: FW: Text v. GUI for Security Software
From: Russ <Russ @ RC . Toronto . on . ca>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com