Well, I guess that the best way to find what firewall provides NAT is
to check NCSA:s firewall certification.
The NCSA firewall product description is good and if you want to see
what firewall has what functionallity it is a good place to start,
and after that check the vendors homepage and so on...
Too bad though that the list isn´t searchable (am I out on deep water
here? Last time I checked it wasn´t)!
We use Digitals Firewall for Unix 2.0 for almost the same
scenario.
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: 26 Jun 96 12:50:59 EDT
> From: Ryan.Russell/SYBASE
> Subject: Re: NAT - question
>
> FIrewall-1 from Checkpoint (or Sun or Qualix...) or
> PIX (Private Internet eXchange) from Cisco.
>
> Ryan
>
> - ---------- Previous Message ----------
> Subject: NAT - question
>
> We have to connect our enterprise network with another corporations
> enterprise network (not the Internet)
>
> Here's the scenario:
>
> 1) Inside workstations/hosts need to use their own network addresses
> 2) Inside workstations (600+) need to connect to outside hosts
> 3) Outside hosts will only allow connections with machines in it's own
> address space
> 4) There are a handful of inside hosts that the outside hosts need to
> communicate with (with outside static IP addresses)
>
> The main concern is that I don't want to burn 600+ addresses from the
> outside network to translate 1-to-1 when only a few of the inside hosts
> need static IP addresses. What I would like to do is translate the
> inside workstations outbound connections to 1 outside address (like I
> currently do with the Gauntlet firewall we use for the Internet) but be
> able to give the internal hosts a static address in the outside address
> space.
>
> Question:
>
> Which vendors offerings can meet the above criteria?
>
> ------------------------------
|
|
