Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(June 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: NCSA Certification
From: Chris Kostick <ckostick @ ashton . csc . com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 1996 18:04:25 -0400 (EDT)
To: secbydes @ thoughtport . com (Jon Tegethoff)
Cc: firewalls @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <v02130501adfb13380dbd @ [206 . 41 . 182 . 2]> from "Jon Tegethoff" at Jun 29, 96 12:23:30 pm

> 
> >2.  Do people realize that in order to be approved,  a vendor must be a
> >member of the NCSA?
> 
> If this is correct, is this improper?  UL has made a significant and
> respectable business in the same mode.
> 
> 
> >3.  Do people realize that the first vendors approved were all members of
> >the NCSA and as such got a timing advantage over other non-members?
> 
> Is this true?

So what? All firewall vendors knew how the certification was
going to proceed, and in fact the vendor consortium put it together.
For those that don't know, the firewall certification program was put
together by NCSA *and* the vendor community who were members. 

Getting back to the so what... every firewall vendor knew about this
program for well over one year. If they didn't want to join, fine; but
no vendor was given advantage over another.

--
Chris Kostick


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: How good is "stateful inspection"? (fwd)
From: Ryan.Russell/SYBASE
Next: Re: NCSA Certification
From: Chris Kostick <ckostick @ ashton . csc . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: NCSA Certification
From: Kent Crispin <kent @ bywater . songbird . com>
Next: Re: NCSA Certification
From: Chris Kostick <ckostick @ ashton . csc . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com