Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(August 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: To Subnet or not?
From: Paul Harrison <pah @ esoft . co . uk>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 16:36:16 +0100
To: firewalls @ greatcircle . com
Reply-to: pah @ esoft . co . uk

I'm sure that this is blindingly obvious, but I have not been able to find any
references to it...

I have a class C address for my network - As part of my firewall I will have a
dual homed sparc 5 running Solaris 2.5. I want to forward packets from one
interface to the other - am I allowed to use netmask 255.255.255.0 with both
interfaces in the same subnet e.g.

192.100.100.1 and the other on 192.100.100.2

I have tried to set routing up for this up and failed so the question is

Do I have to subnet a class C address to achieve packet forwarding or is there
some trick in the routing that I am missing??

All the references on this soft of setup assume that you are doing packet
forwarding from something like 192.100.100.1 to 192.100.99.1, but I only have a
class C from my ISP and cannot affort to loose the half my IP addresses that
subnetting would cause.

Paul.
-- 

-------------
Paul Harrison                       Tel:  +44 (0)161 776 4498      
Engineering Software Ltd            Fax:  +44 (0)161 776 2680      
Carrington Business Park          Email:  paul .
 harrison @
 esoft .
 co .
 uk
Manchester M31 4XL                  WWW:  http://www.esoft.co.uk
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=


Follow-Ups:
Indexed By Date Previous: RE:Firewall and NOS integration (NetWare and NT)
From: smoubray @ v-one . com (Steve Moubray)
Next: Trying to understand packet pair.
From: Matthew Stier - Imonics Corporation <matthew . stier @ imonics . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: tcp_wrapper problems (getsockname: Invalid argument)
From: N D Ghaznavi <ndg @ Ghaznavi . com>
Next: Re: To Subnet or not?
From: Brian Hatch <bri @ ifokr . org>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com