Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(August 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: NT Firewalling
From: Alan Hannan <alan @ gi . net>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 22:58:53 -0500 (CDT)
To: proberts @ clark . net (Paul D. Robertson)
Cc: njs @ scifi . squawk . com, firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <Pine . GSO . 3 . 95 . 960813170156 . 1351C-100000 @ clark . net> from "Paul D. Robertson" at Aug 13, 96 05:08:13 pm

  We at GI recommend 64M of ram for our Centri firewall.  We require
  32M.  It runs passingly well on 32, but most optimally at 64
  Megs.

  Also (from http://www/Global/centrifirewall.html):

:GI: Minimum Hardware/Software Requirements
:GI: 
:GI: * 90+ MHz Intel CPU with minimum of 32M RAM
:GI: * Microsoft[TM] Windows NT 3.51 installed
:GI: * Suitable display with corresponding video card
:GI: * 2 GB hard disk drive
:GI: * CD-ROM drive
:GI: * 1.44 MB 3.5" floppy disk drive
:GI: * PCI network adapter

  -alan

  ps who hopes he didn't inject any sales fluff :)

.........  Paul D. Robertson is rumored to have said:
] 
] On Tue, 13 Aug 1996, Nick Simicich wrote:
] 
] > > > With this neverending upgrade of client PC's, the availability of
] > > > Intel machines powerful enough to act as a firewall increases. Most 
] > > > of us probably have an old 486/66 they can put 32MB in and run NT, 
] > > > no?
] > > 
] > > Or 8MB and run FreeBSD or Linux.
] > 
] > Can you really run NT effectively in 32 meg?  I have a friend who has 32 meg
] > in an Intel box running NT, and he is going to get another 32 meg, because he
] > says that whenever he loads any app, the box just sits there and thrashes. 
] 
] You can effectively run *BSD, Solaris for Intel, and Linux on such a 
] machine.  That offers a large range of commercial and do-it-yourself
] options involving filtering, application proxies, and hybrids.  Most of
] the NT folks I've spoken to wouldn't procure a box with less than 64M on
] it to do much of anything.  Perhaps one of the NT vendors could post base
] requirements without adding any salesfluff?  
] 
] Paul
] -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
] Paul D. Robertson      "My statements in this message are personal opinions
] proberts @
 clark .
 net      which may have no basis whatsoever in fact."
]                                                                      PSB#9280
] 
] 



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: huh? switch hitter?
From: Robert Hanson <roberth @ cet . com>
Next: Re: Other Firewall products for Frame Relay Network?
From: "Jeff D. Hayes" <hayesjd @ mnbp2 . network . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: NT Firewalling
From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
Next: Re: NT Memory (formerly NT Firewalling)
From: "Karl W. Palachuk" <karlp @ ix . netcom . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com