Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(August 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re[2]: huh? switch hitter?
From: Brian Murrell <Brian_Murrell @ bctel . net>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 09:17:46 -0700 (PDT)
To: lists @ lina . inka . de
Cc: roberth @ cet . com, firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <m0uqYAU-0004k3C @ lina>

from the quill of lists @
 lina .
 inka .
 de (Bernd Eckenfels) on scroll
<m0uqYAU-0004k3C @
 lina>
> On a switched ethernet a NIC in promisc mode will only receive the
> packets
> which are broadcasted (i.e. ARP) and those which are send directly to the
> HW-Address of the interface. Thats the reason why u have less collisions
> with switches, cause they simply filter the Packets on the net for each
> port. You can also lock the arp-addresses in the switch for more
> security.

Don't people usually switch segments rather than individual hosts??  Isn't
switching ethernet a little expensive to do it by host??  If the switching
is done by segment rather than by host, then one could still sniff one's
own physical segment.

b.


--
Brian J. Murrell                                        Brian_Murrell @
 bctel .
 net
BCTel Advanced Communications                                   brian @
 ilinx .
 com
Vancouver, B.C.                                                brian @
 wimsey .
 com
604 454 5279


Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: NT Firewalling
From: "Fernando da Silveira Montenegro" <silveira @ nutec . com . br>
Next: Re: SOCKS4.2 specifications
From: yingda @ esd . sgi . com (Ying-Da Lee)
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: huh? switch hitter?
From: lists @ lina . inka . de (Bernd Eckenfels)
Next: Re: Re[2]: huh? switch hitter?
From: "Roderick Murchison, Jr." <murchiso @ vivid . newbridge . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com