Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(September 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Internet policy
From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 12:37:49 -0500 (CDT)
To: mstoico @ metlife . com (Mike Stoico)
Cc: dckinder @ ahcbsd1 . ovnet . com, firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <3 . 0b19 . 32 . 19960917121834 . 009a4a50 @ hqmail . metlife . com> from "Mike Stoico" at Sep 17, 96 12:18:36 pm

This is all a reference to the Prodigy case, where it was found that Prodigy
was responsible for the actions of their SIGops (or whatever Prodigy calls
them) and that their SIGops were responsible for enforcing the charter of
their SIG in an evenhanded manner. That doesn't mean they were responsible
for the entire content of their SIG, just that if they removed an illegal
post from one poster and left another one up then they were responsible for
leaving the second one up.

It was *also* a pre-trial decision. I don't know how the trial went.


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: SYN Floods - solution-2 [was misspelled as Re: SYS Floods - solution-2 ]
From: Chris Garrigues <cwg @ DeepEddy . Com>
Next: Re: Internet policy
From: "Brian Monkman" <bmonkman @ milkyway . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Internet policy
From: Mike Stoico <mstoico @ metlife . com>
Next: Re: Internet policy
From: Robert Hanson <roberth @ cet . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com