I agree with you. There has to be a point we're security falls back into
the lap of department managers. It would be nice if there was a mechanism
that would automatically get rid of 'bad things that people do', but frogs
don't have wings and the mechanism doesn't exist. Management needs to be
accountable at some level and an issue like this is one way to get them
into the loop.
At 11:00 AM 9/17/96 -0700, you wrote:
>
>On Tue, 17 Sep 1996, Mike Stoico wrote:
>
>> Didn't his start out with Compuserve? I remember ther was a lawsuit where
>> it was determined if you monitor any of the content coming in you're
>> responsible for all of the content coming in. Cserve (or was it Prodigy)
>> said they more like the post office in that they just moved the messages
>> from sender to receiver and didn't monitor the content.
>> my concern is that if I monitor only a part of the sites that my users go
>> to and someone goes to a site I have not monitored that I wouldn't have a
>> legal leg to stand on.
>>
>
>at this point... company "policy and procedures" in relationship to the
>employee(s) need to be looked at... implemented, acknowledged, signed and
>sealed...
>
>time to talk to your counselor and let them do their jobs.
>
>--->
>Robert H. Hanson LAN/WAN Consultant - Internet Service Provider
>Otis Orchards, Wa. Cutting Edge Communications www.cet.com
>(509) 927-9541 finger: info @
cet .
com or email: roberth @
cet .
com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
=========================================================================
Mike Stoico, I/S Security Consultant * Phone: (518)285-2567
MetLife * Fax: (518)285-2542
500 Jordan Rd * E-Mail: mstoico @
metlife .
com
Troy, NY 12180 * URL: www.metlife.com
=========================================================================
The opinions expressed here are my own and may not be those of my employer.
=========================================================================
|
|
