Hi,
I would definitely like to look at the paper !!
Thanks.
Ng Kar Hong
karhong @
sns .
com .
sg
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: FW: NT vs. UNIX white paper
Author: dgeesey @
balink .
com (F. D. GEESEY) at Internet
Date: 9/19/96 7:49
I would like to take a look at the paper. Thanks.
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: FW: NT vs. UNIX white paper
Author: "Bravo Kristopher" <bravokris @
bah .
com> at Internet
Date: 9/18/96 10:59 AM
I would as well, Bill.
Kris
----------
From: dont[SMTP:firewalls-owner @
GreatCircle .
COM]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 1996 10:53 AM
To: Firewalls; Bill Stout
Cc: ntsecurity
Subject: Re: NT vs. UNIX white paper
I would be interested.
... don
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: NT vs. UNIX white paper
Author: Bill Stout <bill .
stout @
hidata .
com> at ESD
Date: 9/17/96 5:00 PM
I am cross-posting between firewall-list @
greatcircle .
com &
nt-security @
iss .
net .
I'm wondering if just a few folk would help me by reviewing and
commenting on a nearly finished, short 35 page white paper I've
hacked (no pun intended) together comparing sections of NT vs.
UNIX network security. If others have also created internal white
papers on NT Security maybe we could collaborate?
So far I have NT & UNIX; logon security, network file share security,
attack methods, and some references. I did not compare insecure
protocols like ftp, telnet, tftp, finger, etc. Plus I didn't get to
the multiple Inter-Process Communications methods other than SMB
over NETBIOS/TCP.
I can attach it as a MIME document, written in MS Word 7.0, 166KB.
I don't think the lists would appreciate it if I generally posted it.
However if I do get toooo many requests I just might. ;)
Bill Stout
__________________________________________________________________________
_____
_
Senior Systems Admin NT/UNIX/I-net/Routers/Mainframes/Janitor ;)
Hitachi Data Systems 408-970-4822 --- Disclaimer: I speak only for
myself
___________"Infowar, Cyber-war, yes, 'they' _are_ out to get
you..."___________
|
|
