Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(September 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: RE: IPsec
From: Gene Lee <genel @ inforamp . net>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 17:14:30 -0400
To: "firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM" <firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM>

On Friday, September 27, 1996 11:39 AM, Craig 
McLellan[SMTP:Craig_McLellan @
 stkamer .
 stortek .
 com] wrote:
>Below I have attached an applicable portion of a press release from a 
company
>claiming to support the IPSEC standards.  It is my understanding that 
these
>standards are some ways off ?
>
>Could someone clarify whether this company is correct of if this is just
>vendor hype?
>
>Did I miss a meeting? or are these standards still in draft form?

No, look up RFC's 1825-1829 on the IPsec Protocol. Currently, the IETF is 
working on a standard for Key Management Protocols for things like 
distribution (see Section 4. Key Management in RFC 1825), but there are 
some existing ways for Automated Key Distribution (like adding signed Host 
Keys to the Domain Name System [EK94], etc), but the lowest common 
denominator currently for true multi-vendor interoperability is manual key 
distribution.


--
Gene Lee
genel @
 inforamp .
 net
genelee @
 vnet .
 ibm .
 com


Indexed By Date Previous: Re: 'secure' intranet mailreading?
From: Marc Mosko <marc @ tear . com>
Next: RE: netbeui & tcp
From: fdehert @ innet . be (Frank J.J. De Hert)
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: SparcLinux/OS for a secure bastion host
From: fdehert @ innet . be (Frank J.J. De Hert)
Next: SCO sendmail or mmdf
From: "John McColley @ J F Engineering" <jfjohnm @ ca-online . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com