Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(October 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: pop mail through gauntlet
From: Ed Donegan <impulse @ ccnet . com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 1996 13:55:29 -0700
To: Colin Campbell <sgcccdc @ citec . qld . gov . au>
Cc: Mike Stoico <mstoico @ metlife . com>, firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
References: <199610242228 . IAA18471 @ guru . citec . qld . gov . au>
Reply-to: impulse @ ccnet . com

Colin Campbell wrote:
> 
> My mailer thinks Mike Stoico said:
> >
> > We have a need for some of our users to access a pop mail server that sits
> > outside of our network through Gauntlet.  Is there any configuring that
> > needs to be done to Gauntlet to ahve this happen?  We are using netscape mail.
> >
> At the risk of offending Mike, this kind of mail worries me, for several reasons.
> 
> 1) Mike apparently knows so little about the product with which he is "securing"
>    his network(s) that he has to ask this list.
> 
>    [At worst he could use plug-gw or even try the pop-gw :-]
> 
>    Surely an RTFM would not hurt.
> 
> 2) Several people have recently posted questions re Gauntlet to this and/or the
>    fwtk-users list which makes me wonder if Gauntlet support from TIS is
> 
>    a) non-existent
>    b) bad
>    c) oxymoron
> 
>    Why are these people not contacting TIS for their problems? They are paying
>    several thousand dollars per year for support.
> 
> 3) I have just recommended purchasing Gauntlet.
> 
> Anyone care to comment?
> 
> Colin
Yes.  Your attitude stinks.


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re:
From: Frank Beall <fbeall @ borg . mayfield . hp . com>
Next: Re: SMTP security breach -Reply
From: chris michael <cm @ rmsbus . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: pop mail through gauntlet
From: Craig Schlenter <craig @ tns . co . za>
Next: Re: pop mail through gauntlet
From: Ikoedem Moses <moses @ mail . state . mo . us>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com