Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(November 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: ssh licensing
From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 1996 10:19:26 -0500 (EST)
To: C Matthew Curtin <cmcurtin @ research . megasoft . com>
Cc: firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <199611101325 . IAA14981 @ goffette . research . megasoft . com>

On Sun, 10 Nov 1996, C Matthew Curtin wrote:

> I'm wondering how much ElGamal is going to start popping up for
> session key exchange and that sort of thing. (PKP claims that ElGamal

Hrm, I thought that PKP was disolved by a court, and it's functions taken 
up by another entity?  Does anyone have anything definitive on this?

> is covered by the patent on DH, but that expires in April '97.) The
> biggest problem with ElGamal is how incredibly slow it is (compared to
> RSA) for the function of signature verification...

Well, it that's the case, I'd expect to see a lot more DH key exchange 
after that. :)  

Paul
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Robertson      "My statements in this message are personal opinions
proberts @
 clark .
 net      which may have no basis whatsoever in fact."
                                                                     PSB#9280



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: ssh licensing
From: C Matthew Curtin <cmcurtin @ research . megasoft . com>
Next: syslog vs high load
From: Michael Richardson <mcr @ sandelman . ottawa . on . ca>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: ssh licensing
From: C Matthew Curtin <cmcurtin @ research . megasoft . com>
Next: Re: Plain-text passwords
From: "Rudy Amid" <rudy @ hcl . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com