No, this is not normal, and would indicate a pretty hosed routing
problem. :-)
- paul
At 04:01 AM 11/27/96 -0500, Russ wrote:
>*
>15 130 ms 151 ms 140 ms tpa-max.THOUGHTPORT.NET [206.41.176.10]
> 16 130 ms 140 ms 140 ms CHI-Cisco01.thoughtport.COM
>[199.171.236.1]
> 17 190 ms 140 ms 141 ms tpa-max.THOUGHTPORT.NET [206.41.176.10]
> 18 130 ms 140 ms 140 ms CHI-Cisco01.thoughtport.COM
>[199.171.236.1]
> 19 150 ms 160 ms 150 ms tpa-max.THOUGHTPORT.NET [206.41.176.10]
> 20 140 ms 160 ms 140 ms CHI-Cisco01.thoughtport.COM
>[199.171.236.1]
> 21 140 ms 150 ms 150 ms tpa-max.THOUGHTPORT.NET [206.41.176.10]
> 22 151 ms 160 ms 140 ms CHI-Cisco01.thoughtport.COM
>[199.171.236.1]
> 23 141 ms 160 ms 160 ms tpa-max.THOUGHTPORT.NET [206.41.176.10]
> 24 140 ms 130 ms 150 ms CHI-Cisco01.thoughtport.COM
>[199.171.236.1]
> 25 150 ms 161 ms 140 ms tpa-max.THOUGHTPORT.NET [206.41.176.10]
> 26 140 ms 181 ms 170 ms CHI-Cisco01.thoughtport.COM
>[199.171.236.1]
> 27 160 ms 161 ms 180 ms tpa-max.THOUGHTPORT.NET [206.41.176.10]
> 28 200 ms 171 ms 150 ms CHI-Cisco01.thoughtport.COM
>[199.171.236.1]
> 29 160 ms 181 ms 350 ms tpa-max.THOUGHTPORT.NET [206.41.176.10]
> 30 190 ms 251 ms 240 ms CHI-Cisco01.thoughtport.COM
>[199.171.236.1]
>*
>*
>Normal? I don't understand, why would two routers be pointing to each
>other just because a route is down? Maybe its something real basic that
>I'm missing here because I figured there was a problem, but I just
>can't figure out why they would be pointing to each other and not
>simply timing out. Is this the type of stuff we can look forward to
>when we have redundant routes and parallel Firewalls?
>*
--
Paul Ferguson || ||
Consulting Engineering || ||
Herndon, Virginia USA |||| ||||
tel: +1.703.397.5938 ..:||||||:..:||||||:..
e-mail: pferguso @
cisco .
com c i s c o S y s t e m s
|
|
