Other Indexes

• Previous month (November 1996)
• Next month (January 1997)
• This month, indexed by thread

• Tuesday 31 December 1996
  • Wasted Taxpayer Dollars?
    From: Robert Hanson <roberth @ cet . com>
  • Re: Air Force Web Site Hacked
    From: norm @ UU . NET (Norm Laudermilch)
  • Re: Air Force Web Site Hacked
    From: Dave Kinchlea <security @ kinch . ark . com>
  • Re: Air Force Web Site Hacked
    From: Rabid Wombat <wombat @ mcfeely . bsfs . org>
  • Re: Air Force Web Site Hacked
    From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
  • Re: Christopher Klaus and ISS
    From: Robert Hanson <roberth @ cet . com>
  • Re: Untrusted vs. trusted network security
    From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
  • Is Your Website a Secret?
    From: owl @ owlsnest . com
  • Re: Christopher Klaus and ISS
    From: Todd Graham Lewis <lists @ reflections . mindspring . com>
  • Re: Untrusted vs. trusted network security
    From: Todd Graham Lewis <lists @ reflections . mindspring . com>
  • RE: Untrusted vs. trusted network security
    From: Todd Graham Lewis <lists @ reflections . mindspring . com>
  • Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
    From: FaNgYoU2 <fangyou2 @ panix . com>
• Tuesday 31 December 1996
  • RE: Air force web site hacked
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • Re: Air Force Web Site Hacked
    From: Mark Laubach <laubach @ terra . com21 . com>
  • Re: Air Force Web Site Hacked
    From: Chris Plunkett <chris @ opensys . com>
  • Re: Air Force Web Site Hacked
    From: "Jamie Thain" <jthain @ cat . bbsr . edu>
  • Re: Air force web site hacked
    From: Adam Shostack <adam @ homeport . org>
  • Re: Air Force Web Site Hacked
    From: Mark Johnson <mark @ hercules . reno . nv . us>
  • Re: Air Force Web Site Hacked
    From: "Jamie Thain" <jthain @ cat . bbsr . edu>
  • Re: Using Remote Workstation as Hole??
    From: "Jamie Thain" <jthain @ cat . bbsr . edu>
  • Re: Air Force Web Site Hacked
    From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
  • Re: WWW Gaffiti Immunity (Off Topic)
    From: cwg @ DeepEddy . Com
  • DNS Proxy and Internal Root Name Server
    From: "R. McMahon" <mcmr @ mailhost . net>
  • Re: Air Force Web Site Hacked
    From: Dave Kinchlea <security @ kinch . ark . com>
  • Re: gopher
    From: Neophytos Iacovou <iacovou @ phish . micro . umn . edu>
  • RE: Air force web site hacked
    From: mrwilhe @ odin . cmp . ilstu . edu
  • Re: Air Force Web Site Hacked
    From: Mark Johnson <mark @ hercules . reno . nv . us>
  • RE: Air Force Web Site Hacked
    From: Gene Lee <genel @ inforamp . net>
  • WWW Gaffiti Immunity (Off Topic)
    From: Brad Daugherty <bsd @ pobox . com>
  • Re: Air Force Web Site Hacked
    From: Steve Edwards <sedwards @ cts . com>
  • Re: Air Force Web Site Hacked
    From: Mark Johnson <mark @ hercules . reno . nv . us>
  • Re: Air Force Web Site Hacked
    From: Alfred Huger <ahuger @ secnet . com>
  • Re: Air Force Web Site Hacked
    From: Dale Drew <ddrew @ mci . net>
  • Re: the FAQ
    From: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr @ mail . clark . net>
  • [no subject]
    From: Bscetco @ aol . com
  • FW: Online Transaction
    From: "Button, Dave" <Button . Dave @ CyberTrust . Com>
  • Re: Using Remote Workstation as Hole??
    From: Adam Shostack <adam @ homeport . org>
  • Re: Air Force Web Site Hacked
    From: Thomas Leitner <tom @ finwds01 . tu-graz . ac . at>
  • Securing a LAN
    From: Denis Vella <dvella @ ptl . com . mt>
  • Re: Air Force Web Site Hacked
    From: Michael Idengren <midengre @ stetson . edu>
  • RE: Using Remote Workstation as Hole??
    From: Gene Lee <genel @ inforamp . net>
  • Re: Using Remote Workstation as Hole??
    From: Chris Lonvick <clonvick @ cisco . com>
  • Re: Using Remote Workstation as Hole??
    From: mike @ ptes . com (Mike Bernhardt)
• Monday 30 December 1996
  • Air Force Web Site Hacked
    From: Christopher Klaus <cklaus @ iss . net>
  • Re: Considerations on designing a firewall
    From: Steven Herod <sherod @ medeserv . com . au>
  • Re: Q:is this Cisco ACL config OK?
    From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
  • Re: fw1/address translation
    From: jsluzewski @ dna . com
  • RE: How do I get off this list
    From: Shishir Belbase <shishpop @ ftp . com>
  • Q:is this Cisco ACL config OK?
    From: Robert Strickler <RStrickler @ thrunet . net>
  • Designing a firewall
    From: "Martin Hein"<Martin_Hein @ maxmobil . at>
  • Firewall on Novell ? Linux ?
    From: Albrecht Jacobs <aj @ klee . architektur . uni-stuttgart . de>
  • [no subject]
    From: randy . crolley @ srs . gov
  • USAF HACK
    From: "NICK.BEINHOFF.GT1H" <NICK . BEINHOFF . GT1H @ statefarm . com>
  • Re: EPL (Evaluated Products List)
    From: "Cary Conover(IS) 13897" <cconov @ exp2 . is . xpark . pmh . org>
  • Re: Considerations on designing a firewall
    From: "Donald R. Guillot" <dguill @ communique . net>
  • RE: NCSA != NCSC
    From: ckaplan @ nohackers . com
  • USAF Hack mirror
    From: skeeve @ skeeve . net (Skeeve Stevens)
  • Re: Firewall-1 Mailing list
    From: Joe Loiacono <jloiacon @ csc . com>
  • M$ WinNT 3.51/EAGLE Soft Firewall
    From: "Martin Hein"<Martin_Hein @ maxmobil . at>
  • Considerations on designing a firewall
    From: "Martin Hein"<Martin_Hein @ maxmobil . at>
  • RE: EPL (Evaluated Products List)
    From: Gene Lee <genel @ inforamp . net>
  • Re: need suggestions
    From: "Donald R. Guillot" <dguill @ communique . net>
  • question regarding bandwidth through bastion host
    From: keithstevens @ acsinc . net (Keith Stevens)
  • [no subject]
    From: Donald . J . Smith @ cdev . com (Donald J Smith)
• Sunday 29 December 1996
  • Re: need suggestions
    From: shiggins @ naccess . com (Sean higgins)
  • Re: fw1/address translation
    From: shiggins @ naccess . com (Sean higgins)
  • need suggestions
    From: keithstevens @ acsinc . net (Keith Stevens)
  • Re: Firewall Rating NCSA != NCSC
    From: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr @ mail . clark . net>
  • Re: Firewall Rating NCSA != NCSC
    From: Jim Truitt <jtruitt @ pagesz . net>
  • Re: EPL (Evaluated Products List)
    From: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr @ mail . clark . net>
  • Re: Firewall Rating NCSA != NCSC
    From: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr @ mail . clark . net>
  • Re: fw1/address translation
    From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
  • How do I get off this list
    From: Manipal Control Data Electronics <mcd-ecom @ giasbg01 . vsnl . net . in>
  • RE: Looking for a freeware NT 4.0 firewall that ..........
    From: Gene Lee <genel @ inforamp . net>
  • RE: EPL (Evaluated Products List)
    From: Gene Lee <genel @ inforamp . net>
  • RE: Firewall Rating NCSA != NCSC
    From: Gene Lee <genel @ inforamp . net>
  • RE: Looking for a freeware NT 4.0 firewall that ..........
    From: Gene Lee <genel @ inforamp . net>
  • Re: Firewall Rating NCSA != NCSC
    From: Jim Truitt <jtruitt @ pagesz . net>
  • fw1/address translation
    From: jblumen @ xmission . com (john blumenthal)
  • EPL (Evaluated Products List)
    From: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr @ mail . clark . net>
  • Re: Firewall Rating NCSA != NCSC
    From: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr @ mail . clark . net>
  • Re: promiscuous mode
    From: shiggins @ naccess . com (Sean higgins)
  • Re: HELP ! w/dns and fw-1
    From: shiggins @ naccess . com (Sean higgins)
  • Re: Looking for a freeware NT 4.0 firewall that ..........
    From: shiggins @ naccess . com (Sean higgins)
  • Re: Checkpoint Firewall-1, NT vs UNIX
    From: shiggins @ naccess . com (Sean higgins)
• Saturday 28 December 1996
  • Re: gopher
    From: Benjamin Camp <benc @ geocel . com>
  • Re: A Postcard!
    From: fdehert @ innet . be (Frank J.J. De Hert)
  • RE: RFP for firewalls
    From: Gene Lee <genel @ inforamp . net>
  • Online Transaction
    From: "Mohd. Faisal Abang" <faisal @ sains . com . my>
• Friday 27 December 1996
  • Re: Pros & Cons on Guardian 2.0 for NT4.0
    From: "Cary Conover(IS) 13897" <cconov @ exp2 . is . xpark . pmh . org>
  • RFP for firewalls
    From: SaundeJo @ rf . suny . edu (Saunders, Joel)
  • Re: Firewall Security Ratings
    From: "robertp @ hal-pc . org" <robertp @ hal-pc . org>
  • Re: A Postcard!
    From: pelicans @ mindspring . com (BeachCruiser)
  • Re: NT vulnerable to attack on CPU (fwd)
    From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
  • gopher
    From: aisecur!HReilly @ bpd . treas . gov (Helen Reilly)
  • Re: Firewall Security Ratings
    From: Mark Johnson <mark @ hercules . reno . nv . us>
  • Re: Radius logs....?
    From: eric chan <eric . chan @ netvigator . com>
  • Re: A Postcard!
    From: vadillo @ apu . rcp . net . pe (Enrique Vadillo)
  • Firewall Security Ratings
    From: "Richard F. Trezza" <rtrezza @ worldnet . att . net>
  • Re: A Postcard!
    From: Dan Murphy <dan @ pantera . nclib . fiu . edu>
  • looking for feed back on altavista NT product
    From: Jim Jones <jrjones @ comsource . net>
  • promiscuous mode
    From: Ikoedem Moses <moses @ mail . state . mo . us>
  • Looking for a freeware NT 4.0 firewall that ..........
    From: Shishir Belbase <shishpop @ ftp . com>
  • Looking for a freeware NT 4.0 firewall that ..........
    From: Shishir Belbase <shishpop @ ftp . com>
  • Pros & Cons on Guardian 2.0 for NT4.0
    From: Information Systems Security Officer <isnavsta @ ORF . NCTAMSLANT . NAVY . MIL>
  • access mail
    From: Majo Danisek <majo @ sunteq . sk>
  • screend
    From: "Young-jeong, CHO" <yjcho @ daewoo . dhi . co . kr>
  • Re: Dog daze...
    From: Michael Dillon <michael @ memra . com>
• Thursday 26 December 1996
  • Re: Checkpoint Firewall-1, NT vs UNIX
    From: "Jamie Thain" <jthain @ cat . bbsr . edu>
  • Re: Checkpoint Firewall-1, NT vs UNIX
    From: David Murray <dmurray @ camtech . com . au>
  • Re: Checkpoint Firewall-1, NT vs UNIX
    From: Ken Wilcox <wilcox @ poss . com>
  • Plug-gw/proxy server for SSH (was Re: No FQDNs in known_hosts, bug or feature? )
    From: Michael Richardson <mcr @ sandelman . ottawa . on . ca>
  • Radius logs....?
    From: vadillo @ apu . rcp . net . pe (Enrique Vadillo)
  • Re: A Postcard!
    From: Dave Schnardthorst <ds3721 @ strydr . com>
  • Re: Checkpoint Firewall-1, NT vs UNIX
    From: "Jamie Thain" <jthain @ cat . bbsr . edu>
  • RE: IP conflict
    From: "M. Christopher Davies" <mcd @ alliedtelecom . com>
  • Not read: Firewalls-Digest V5 #590
    From: G6 AUTO SYSTEM INTEG CPT Bates <G6AMSIB @ iron1 . 1ad . army . mil>
  • Checkpoint Firewall-1, NT vs UNIX
    From: Henry Lim Chee Wee <cwlim @ ncs . com . sg>
  • Re: Dog daze...
    From: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr @ mail . clark . net>
• Wednesday 25 December 1996
  • Re: Firewall-1 Mailing list
    From: Kevin Steves <stevesk @ nsr . hp . com>
• Tuesday 24 December 1996
  • RE: IP conflict
    From: Matthew Thompson <mthomps1 @ kiwitech . co . nz>
  • RE: IP conflict
    From: nkeenan @ gsionline . com (Nick Keenan)
  • packet filtering on PPP interfaces
    From: Marc Goldburg <marcg @ arraycomm . com>
  • RE: IP conflict
    From: mike @ ptes . com (Mike Bernhardt)
  • Firewall-1 Mailing list
    From: "Jamie Thain" <jthain @ cat . bbsr . edu>
  • Re: HArris CyberGuard
    From: "Saqib A. Khan" <Saqib_Khan @ snc-net . com>
  • RE: IP conflict
    From: Gene Lee <genel @ inforamp . net>
  • RE: LDAP and Firewalls
    From: Gene Lee <genel @ inforamp . net>
  • Re: HArris CyberGuard
    From: Chris Lonvick <clonvick @ cisco . com>
  • Re: IP confkict
    From: Ron DuFresne <dufresne @ parka . winternet . com>
  • A Postcard!
    From: David . Schnardthorst @ strydr . com
  • HArris CyberGuard
    From: "Darwin L. Martinez" <darwin_martinez @ INS . COM>
  • Dog daze...
    From: Russ <Russ . Cooper @ RC . on . ca>
  • Re: IP confkict
    From: "Jamie Thain" <jthain @ cat . bbsr . edu>
  • Guardian 2.0 for Win NT4.0
    From: isnavsta @ orf . nctamslant . navy . mil (information systems security off)
  • Re: NT vulnerable to attack on CPU (fwd)
    From: Craig Brozefsky <cosmo @ ebs . net>
  • IP confkict
    From: "Hisham Abdullatif Al-Rumaihi" <rumaihi @ admin . uob . bh>
  • firewall discussion group .
    From: ylqiu @ sscb . ssc . ndf . com@bharat.ColumbiaSC.NCR.COM
  • Re: NT vulnerable to attack on CPU (fwd)
    From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Re: NT bug versus fork bomb
    From: Michael Dillon <michael @ memra . com>
  • Re: Wierd
    From: Michael Hawk <mike @ gi . net>
  • Re: KNETD Port connection to my Web Server
    From: Martin Pool <mbp @ pharos . com . au>
  • Merry Christmas and Happy New Year everyone!
    From: KENNETH PHANG <kent @ pc . jaring . my>
  • Re: LDAP and Firewalls
    From: Gaddy Gumbao <succesor @ mnl . sequel . net>
• Monday 23 December 1996
  • Gauntlet 2.0 with NT4.0 system
    From: "Rodney G. Meryweather" <rodrcc @ visi . net>
  • FW: IP confkict
    From: Mike Topalovich <TOPALOVICH @ terraglyph . com>
  • LDAP and Firewalls
    From: "Stout, Bill" <bill . stout @ hidata . com>
  • Re: Christopher Klaus and ISS
    From: Vangelis <vangelis @ qnis . net>
  • Re: Wierd
    From: dharris @ kcp . com
  • KNETD Port connection to my Web Server
    From: Steve <Steve @ hon . com>
  • Re: Aol through TIS Gauntlet
    From: Gordy Thompson <gordy @ nytimes . com>
  • Re: Aol through TIS Gauntlet
    From: mgetter @ advstaff . com
  • NAT on IRIX
    From: Ruben Sajnovetzky <ruben @ is . com . ar>
  • Re: Bad Humour
    From: Adam Shostack <adam @ homeport . org>
  • RE: NT bug versus fork bomb
    From: David LeBlanc <dleblanc @ iss . net>
  • Christopher Klaus and ISS
    From: "Feeney, Tim" <Tim . Feeney @ FMR . COM>
  • Re: restricting OUTBOUND access
    From: long-morrow @ CS . YALE . EDU
  • Re: Bad Humour
    From: Rick Romkey <pokey @ maddie . atlantic . com>
  • Bad Humour
    From: "Jamie Thain" <jthain @ cat . bbsr . edu>
  • Re: NT bug versus fork bomb
    From: Adam Shostack <adam @ homeport . org>
  • Re: Aol through TIS Gauntlet
    From: Dan Simoes <dans @ ans . net>
  • RE: Untrusted vs. trusted network security
    From: "Craig I. Hagan" <hagan @ cih . com>
  • Re: NT bug versus fork bomb
    From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb @ FRB . GOV>
  • Re: your mail
    From: Sri <nsriram @ bani . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: Michael Galante <mgalante @ nwdc . com>
  • Merry XMAS
    From: Ken Meade <kmeade @ tcd . ie>
  • RE: IP confkict
    From: @ltsa01.sa.lucent.com:mghanemi @ ltsa01 . sa . lucent . com
  • IP confkict
    From: "Hisham Abdullatif Al-Rumaihi" <rumaihi @ admin . uob . bh>
  • Re: your mail
    From: Annelise J Bazar <lionspaw @ hooked . net>
  • Re: Oracle Client/Server Access through Firewall
    From: "Donald R. Guillot" <dguill @ communique . net>
  • [no subject]
    From: Edna Candari <mstee @ aviastar . net>
  • Re: Wierd [ cisco revers telnet ports 200x ]
    From: Sameer Anja <sameer @ securities . com>
  • Re: Aol through TIS Gauntlet
    From: Gordy Thompson <gordy @ nytimes . com>
• Sunday 22 December 1996
  • ANNOUNCE: RealSecure (tm) 1.0 Has Arrived
    From: Christopher Klaus <cklaus @ iss . net>
  • Aol through TIS Gauntlet
    From: mgetter @ advstaff . com
  • Re: NT filesharing security broken
    From: Craig Brozefsky <cosmo @ ebs . net>
  • Re: NT vulnerable to attack on CPU (fwd)
    From: Craig Brozefsky <cosmo @ ebs . net>
  • RE: NT bug versus fork bomb
    From: Matthew Thompson <mthomps1 @ kiwitech . co . nz>
  • Re: Wierd [ cisco revers telnet ports 200x ]
    From: Rafi Sadowsky <rafi @ tavor . openu . ac . il>
  • Re: Dual-porting of DMZ systems, why?
    From: Frank Willoughby <frankw @ in . net>
  • Re: Firewall checklist
    From: Frank Willoughby <frankw @ in . net>
  • Re: NT bug versus fork bomb
    From: "Jamie Thain" <jthain @ cat . bbsr . edu>
  • Wierd
    From: "Jason T. Luttgens" <luttgenj @ kic . or . jp>
• Saturday 21 December 1996
  • ActiveX and Java Security
    From: "Donald R. Guillot" <dguill @ communique . net>
  • HELP Icon displayed in the system viewer (fwd)
    From: Lee Whitty <lwhitty @ LANcomp . COM>
  • Re: NT bug versus fork bomb
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • Re: NT bug versus fork bomb
    From: "Jamie Thain" <jthain @ cat . bbsr . edu>
  • Re: Untrusted vs. trusted network security
    From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Re: Untrusted vs. trusted network security
    From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Re: Untrusted vs. trusted network security
    From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Re: NT vulnerable to attack on CPU (fwd)
    From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Re: NT bug versus fork bomb
    From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
  • mailing list
    From: Mike Pemberton <pemby @ ecc-uky . campus . mci . net>
  • RE: NT bug versus fork bomb
    From: Petri Virkkula <pvirkkul @ iki . fi>
  • Re: Delegation, FW-farms
    From: gh @ tagomago . compulink . co . uk (Gordon Hundley)
  • RE: NT vulnerable to attack on CPU (fwd)
    From: C Matthew Curtin <cmcurtin @ research . megasoft . com>
  • Re: NT bug versus fork bomb
    From: Petr Snajdr <snajdr @ pvt . net>
  • by the way
    From: pheret <pheret @ pheret . com>
  • RE: NT bug versus fork bomb
    From: Matthew Thompson <mthomps1 @ kiwitech . co . nz>
  • re: Firewalls-Digest V5 #684
    From: "George A Glickman" <gaglickman @ efdswest . navfac . navy . mil>
  • Re: Untrusted vs. trusted network security
    From: "David B. Donahue" <ddonahue @ emf . net>
  • HELP ! w/dns and fw-1
    From: "Martin C. Walker" <martinw @ epcorp . com>
  • NT filesharing security broken
    From: "Stout, Bill" <bill . stout @ hidata . com>
  • Long Post... Is Microsoft Asking for Trouble or Is it in Denial?
    From: Nachos served with butter <nachos @ dis . org>
• Friday 20 December 1996
  • RE: NT bug versus fork bomb
    From: Dave Stagner <stagda @ sys1 . ic . ncs . com>
  • RE: NT bug versus fork bomb
    From: Ken Hardy <ken @ bridge . com>
  • RE: Untrusted vs. trusted network security
    From: Michael Dillon <michael @ memra . com>
  • INFORMATION SECURITY GRADUATE COURSES at EMU
    From: Ken Stephens <Ken_Stephens @ miconsulting . com>
  • RE: NT bug versus fork bomb
    From: Russ <Russ . Cooper @ RC . on . ca>
  • firewall-1 2.1 on solaris x86 NAT BUG !!!
    From: "Martin C. Walker" <martinw @ epcorp . com>
  • Re: Course on FireWalls
    From: Jim Serven <jims @ GLIX . Net>
  • Re: Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: Ambrose Li <news-misc @ mingpaoxpress . com>
  • Re: NT bug versus fork bomb
    From: nkeenan @ gsionline . com (Nick Keenan)
  • RE: NT vulnerable to attack on CPU (fwd)
    From: "Stout, Bill" <bill . stout @ hidata . com>
  • Re: NT bug versus fork bomb
    From: Dave Stagner <stagda @ sys1 . ic . ncs . com>
  • Re: NT bug versus fork bomb
    From: Ron DuFresne <dufresne @ parka . winternet . com>
  • Re: Course on FireWalls
    From: Ben <ben @ edelweb . fr>
  • NT bug versus fork bomb
    From: Dave Stagner <stagda @ sys1 . ic . ncs . com>
  • Re: SATAN Survey
    From: Michael Brennen <mbrennen @ fni . com>
  • Re: Course on FireWalls
    From: Richard Stiennon <richards @ netrex . com>
  • RE: Course on FireWalls
    From: firstcat @ lsli . com
  • Re: Untrusted vs. trusted network security
    From: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr @ mail . clark . net>
  • Re: Untrusted vs. trusted network security
    From: Ken Hardy <ken @ bridge . com>
  • Re: NT vulnerable to attack on CPU (fwd)
    From: "Jim Leo" <ADMIN @ everett . pitt . cc . nc . us>
  • Netcast
    From: Laura_Bohde @ prenhall . com
  • RE: Untrusted vs. trusted network security
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • Course on FireWalls
    From: Administrator2 <admin2 @ sapic . com>
  • FireWall-1 & Routers
    From: Administrator2 <admin2 @ sapic . com>
  • Firewall-1 questions.
    From: "Steven E. Matkoski" <matkoski @ dreamscape . com>
  • Re: SATAN Survey
    From: Gary Hull <ggh14854 @ glaxowellcome . com>
  • Re: runlevel, immutable, freebsd vs. /dev/mem
    From: Edwin Kremer <Edwin . Kremer @ cs . ruu . nl>
  • FIREWALL-1 OVER VLAN
    From: Kogulapalan <palan @ dataprep . com . my>
  • Re: Untrusted vs. trusted network security
    From: "Donald R. Guillot" <dguill @ communique . net>
  • RE: Untrusted vs. trusted network security
    From: "Stout, Bill" <bill . stout @ hidata . com>
  • Sniffer!
    From: Alin Ungureanu <dunarea @ secu . kappa . ro>
  • Snnifer?
    From: Alin Ungureanu <dunarea @ secu . kappa . ro>
  • Re: Untrusted vs. trusted network security
    From: Hiro <hirod @ hutchnet . com . hk>
  • RE: Untrusted vs. trusted network security
    From: Gene Lee <genel @ inforamp . net>
  • RE: Untrusted vs. trusted network security
    From: Gene Lee <genel @ inforamp . net>
  • Re: DNS setup...
    From: "Mike Dilworth" <mjd @ soi . city . ac . uk>
  • firewall-1 over VLAN
    From: Kogulapalan <palan @ dataprep . com . my>
  • Untrusted vs. trusted network security
    From: "Stout, Bill" <bill . stout @ hidata . com>
  • Re: NT vulnerable to attack on CPU (fwd)
    From: "Craig I. Hagan" <hagan @ cih . com>
  • Re: NT vulnerable to attack on CPU (fwd)
    From: Ron DuFresne <dufresne @ parka . winternet . com>
  • NT vulnerable to attack on CPU (fwd)
    From: Damien Miller <dmiller @ vitnet . com . sg>
  • Re: SATAN Survey
    From: Alfred Huger <ahuger @ secnet . com>
  • RE: NT/95 + usage of IP addresses
    From: Russ <Russ . Cooper @ RC . on . ca>
  • Re: SATAN Survey
    From: Davide Gaetano <sysdfg @ Gsu . EDU>
• Thursday 19 December 1996
  • SSH style security for file transfer from Windows boxes
    From: Nick Simicich <njs @ scifi . squawk . com>
  • SATAN Survey
    From: Christopher Klaus <cklaus @ iss . net>
  • Re: Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Re: Strange log in my Firewall
    From: David Helms <david . helms @ checkpoint . com>
  • RE: SMTPD gateway
    From: Chris Pugrud <ChrisP @ steldyn . com>
  • NT vs. UNIX Firewall positioning
    From: "Stout, Bill" <bill . stout @ hidata . com>
  • Re: Strange log in my Firewall
    From: Joe Loiacono <jloiacon @ csc . com>
  • Dual-porting of DMZ systems, why?
    From: Michael Smith <ms @ gf . org>
  • snmp setup
    From: Costin Enache <costin @ mediafax . mediafax . ro>
  • Re[2]: Strange log in my Firewall
    From: apilosov @ cantor . com
  • Re[2]: Strange log in my Firewall
    From: steve . gailey @ nomura . co . uk
  • Re: DNS setup...
    From: Laurie Bostic <Laurie_Bostic @ INS . COM>
  • Re: Strange log in my Firewall
    From: Ryan Russell/SYBASE <Ryan . Russell @ sybase . com>
  • Re: Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Re[2]: Strange log in my Firewall
    From: steve . gailey @ nomura . co . uk
  • Re: runlevel, immutable, freebsd vs. /dev/mem
    From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Re: Strange log in my Firewall
    From: Ian Miller <firewalls @ scientia . com>
  • Re: RADIUS PARAMETERS
    From: William Bulley <web @ merit . edu>
  • Re: Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: Ambrose Li <news-misc @ byron . net4 . io . org>
  • Re: Syn Attack
    From: "Caldwell, Matt COLASC" <caldwm @ msgate . ColumbiaSC . NCR . COM>
  • DNS setup...
    From: "Cihan Subasi (Garanti Tic)" <CihanS @ garanti . com . tr>
  • Re: Strange log in my Firewall
    From: ormonde @ trem . cnt . org . br (Rodrigo Ormonde)
  • Re: Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: Nick Simicich <njs @ scifi . squawk . com>
  • Strange log in my Firewall
    From: Information Systems Security Officer <isnavsta @ ORF . NCTAMSLANT . NAVY . MIL>
  • Re: Strange log in my Firewall
    From: ormonde @ trem . cnt . org . br (Rodrigo Ormonde)
  • RE: ipfwadm firewall for linux
    From: Ben <ben @ edelweb . fr>
  • Re: smap delays
    From: Zoltan Kinczli <Zoltan . KINCZLI @ Optotrans . HU>
  • Re: Strange log in my Firewall
    From: steve . gailey @ nomura . co . uk
  • Re: Is there any freeware implementation of NAT (network address translation)?
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • Re: Definition required
    From: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr @ mail . clark . net>
  • firewall-1 over VLAN
    From: Kogulapalan <palan @ dataprep . com . my>
  • Re: runlevel, immutable, freebsd vs. /dev/mem
    From: Kent Crispin <kent @ songbird . com>
  • re: Raptor Eagle and NNTP
    From: Allen Rogers <arogers @ raptor . com>
  • Re: runlevel, immutable, freebsd vs. /dev/mem
    From: Sameer Anja <sameer @ securities . com>
  • Re: Is there any freeware implementation of NAT (network address translation)?
    From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
  • Re: Is there any freeware implementation of NAT (network address translation)?
    From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
  • Re: How strong is RC4 with 40bit key?
    From: Adam Shostack <adam @ homeport . org>
  • Re: smap delays
    From: Rick Murphy <rick @ tis . com>
  • Re: Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: lists @ lina . inka . de (Bernd Eckenfels)
• Wednesday 18 December 1996
  • RADIUS PARAMETERS
    From: Jose Antonio Izquierdo <jail97 @ medusa . es>
  • Re: Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: Ambrose Li <news-misc @ byron . net4 . io . org>
  • RE: ipfwadm firewall for linux
    From: Gene Lee <genel @ inforamp . net>
  • Re: Definition required
    From: jmperez @ sprynet . com
  • Re: runlevel, immutable, freebsd vs. /dev/mem
    From: Colin Campbell <sgcccdc @ citec . qld . gov . au>
  • Juniper firewall?
    From: Joe Matuscak <matuscak @ rohrer . com>
  • Re: runlevel, immutable, freebsd vs. /dev/mem
    From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
  • Strange log in my Firewall
    From: ormonde @ trem . cnt . org . br (Rodrigo Ormonde)
  • Re: runlevel, immutable, freebsd vs. /dev/mem
    From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Re: Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
  • [no subject]
    From: arager @ mcgraw-hill . com
  • Is there any freeware implementation of NAT (network address translation)?
    From: maspohn @ inf . ufrgs . br (Marco Aurelio Spohn)
  • RE: Definition required
    From: Gene Lee <genel @ inforamp . net>
  • runlevel, immutable, freebsd vs. /dev/mem
    From: apilosov @ cantor . com
  • RE: SMTPD gateway
    From: "Stout, Bill" <bill . stout @ hidata . com>
  • Re: ipfwadm firewall for linux
    From: Ken Kempster <kempster @ monarch . rnb . com>
  • Re: ipfwadm firewall for linux
    From: Dan Boulet <danny @ obtuse . com>
  • Re: SMTPD gateway
    From: Dan Boulet <danny @ obtuse . com>
  • Definition required
    From: steve . gailey @ nomura . co . uk
  • Re: SMTPD gateway
    From: "Jamie Thain" <jthain @ cat . bbsr . edu>
  • Re: smap delays - Reply
    From: Bob Allison <ballison @ scitexdpi . com>
  • None
    From: herve . h . t . templereau @ thomcom . thomson . fr
  • Firewall Evaluation, JAVA, and Job Descriptions
    From: "Charles L. Johnson" <charlesj @ iquest . net>
  • authentication and encryption for dial-u
    From: HERVE . H . T . TEMPLEREAU @ thomcom . thomson . fr
  • Security holes in Solaris 2.5
    From: etxrosd @ nmac . ericsson . se (Robert Stahlbrand)
  • Re: Syn Attack
    From: Ian Miller <firewalls @ scientia . com>
  • Re: Firewall checklist
    From: Rachel Elgali <taf1d @ plmsrv1 . hai . iec . co . il>
  • Re: smap delays
    From: gunni @ if . is (Gunnar Ingvi Thorisson)
  • Re: smap delays
    From: gunni @ if . is (Gunnar Ingvi Thorisson)
  • ipfwadm firewall for linux
    From: <winspace @ void . hell . net> (Norman Widders)
  • How strong is RC4 with 40bit key?
    From: "Tong, Aaron" <aaron @ hkpo . hongkong . ncr . com>
  • SMTPD gateway
    From: Chris Pugrud <ChrisP @ steldyn . com>
  • Re: Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
  • Re: Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: C Matthew Curtin <cmcurtin @ research . megasoft . com>
  • Re: Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: lists @ lina . inka . de (Bernd Eckenfels)
  • Re: Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: Greg Whalin <gwhalin @ numerix . com>
  • Re: Syn Attack
    From: osiris @ pacificnet . net
• Tuesday 17 December 1996
  • Re: Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: lists @ lina . inka . de (Bernd Eckenfels)
  • smap delays
    From: Jeremy Schertzinger <jeremy @ nutleysystems . com>
  • Syn Attack
    From: "Feeney, Tim" <Tim . Feeney @ FMR . COM>
  • Re: Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Re: Blocking Large numbers of Large ICMP's.
    From: "Donald R. Guillot" <dguill @ communique . net>
  • Re: getting fwtk's smap to spool to 2 directories
    From: Marc Mosko <marc @ tear . com>
  • ANNOUNCE: SAFEsuite Network Scanner Bundle For Windows NT
    From: Christopher Klaus <cklaus @ iss . net>
  • Re: Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: Arne Steinkamm <arne @ Steinkamm . COM>
  • Re: Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: David Bonn <david @ sealabs . com>
  • Re: Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: Dave Kinchlea <security @ kinch . ark . com>
  • Re: Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: Matt Willis <willis @ sctc . com>
  • Re: Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: "Jamie Thain" <jthain @ cat . bbsr . edu>
  • Re: Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: Ambrose Li <acli @ www . mingpaoxpress . com>
  • Re: Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Re: Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: Ken Hardy <ken @ bridge . com>
  • Re: Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: Edwin Kremer <Edwin . Kremer @ cs . ruu . nl>
  • None
    From: firewalls-owner @ GreatCircle . COM
  • RE: nslookup via the firewall
    From: "Chin, Augustine" <china @ lci . com>
  • Re: Linux as a FW, Inode bits
    From: PASCAL . DUFOUR @ CDT . cec . be (Tel 495585-224)
  • Re: Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: Todd Graham Lewis <lists @ reflections . mindspring . com>
  • problem with mail
    From: Majo Danisek <majo @ sunteq . sk>
  • Raptor Eagle and NNTP
    From: Juan José Ledesma Poveda <juanjl @ meta4 . es>
  • Re: Problem With Domain
    From: Jean Luc Guyot <guyot @ mail . dotcom . fr>
  • Re: Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
  • Problem with mail
    From: Majo Danisek <majo @ sunteq . sk>
  • Rule: Re: Firewalls-Digest V5 #677
    From: jallaman @ alston . com
  • Reuters ?????
    From: Mario Misic <mario @ iva . laus . hr>
  • RE: Web Proxies
    From: @ltsa01.sa.lucent.com:mghanemi @ ltsa01 . sa . lucent . com
  • RE: Proxy Server problem....
    From: Gene Lee <genel @ inforamp . net>
  • getting fwtk's smap to spool to 2 directories
    From: Philippe Lavoie <philippe . lavoie @ Matrox . COM>
  • Re: Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: blymn @ awadi . com . au (Brett Lymn)
  • Problem With Domain
    From: "- " <KtownKillaz @ msn . com>
  • Re: Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: lists @ lina . inka . de (Bernd Eckenfels)
  • Blocking Large numbers of Large ICMP's.
    From: Steve Lang <stevel @ wave . co . nz>
• Monday 16 December 1996
  • Rule: Re: Firewalls-Digest V5 #676
    From: jallaman @ alston . com
  • Re: How can I route packet by service port?
    From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
  • Re: Reverse DNS Map failure while using http-gw
    From: robw @ marineterminals . com (Robert Williams)
  • Re: Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
  • RE: Gauntlet's RealAudio "Proxy"
    From: Chris Michael <cm @ rmsbus . com>
  • Re: Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: Ambrose Li <acli @ www . mingpaoxpress . com>
  • Re: Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: "Mark Riggins" <mark @ internetstartup . com>
  • Re: Gauntlet's RealAudio "Proxy"
    From: Rick Murphy <rick @ tis . com>
  • RE: NT/95 + usage of IP addresses
    From: Mike Topalovich <TOPALOVICH @ terraglyph . com>
  • Re: How can I route packet by service port?
    From: Inno Eroraha <eroraha @ tis . com>
  • proxy server weaknesses
    From: "Mike Dilworth" <mjd @ soi . city . ac . uk>
  • Re: Reverse DNS Map failure while using http-gw
    From: robw @ marineterminals . com (Robert Williams)
  • FW: Web Proxies
    From: "william.wells" <william . wells @ damark . com>
  • Re: Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: Arne Steinkamm <arne @ Steinkamm . COM>
  • Re: Web Proxies
    From: Ken Hardy <ken @ bridge . com>
  • Intranet Web Access
    From: "Buff, Kurt" <kurt @ SEATTLE . NYLCARE . com>
  • Re: Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: Arne Steinkamm <arne @ Steinkamm . COM>
  • Gauntlet's RealAudio "Proxy"
    From: "Alain Zarinelli" <azari @ hotmail . com>
  • Re: nslookup via the firewall
    From: acli @ www . mingpaoxpress . com (Ambrose Li)
  • Re: Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: acli @ www . mingpaoxpress . com (Ambrose Li)
  • RCP
    From: "mfiocchi" <mfiocchi @ otm . it>
  • need help
    From: MUGE_TASER @ HP-Turkey-om1 . om . hp . com
  • RE: nslookup via the firewall
    From: Frank Beall <fbeall @ borg . mayfield . hp . com>
  • Gauntlet and Encrypted tunnels
    From: Phil Cox <pcc @ stealth . ran . sandia . gov>
  • RE: NT/95 + usage of IP addresses
    From: Mike Topalovich <TOPALOVICH @ terraglyph . com>
  • Beta 2 of Aventail socks v5 server available...
    From: William Perry <wmperry @ aventail . com>
  • Gaunlet - PIX Cisco
    From: "Adrian Gustavo Russo" <arusso @ caro . buenosaires . sgi . com>
  • Re: Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: lists @ lina . inka . de (Bernd Eckenfels)
  • Re: Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: Edwin Kremer <Edwin . Kremer @ cs . ruu . nl>
  • ICMP problems
    From: "Young-jeong, CHO" <yjcho @ daewoo . dhi . co . kr>
  • Oracle Client/Server Access through Firewall
    From: vin @ shore . net (Vin McLellan)
  • Cylink Secure Frame
    From: David Strong <dstrong @ www . os . dhhs . gov>
  • RE: Proxy Server problem....
    From: "Cihan Subasi (Garanti Tic)" <CihanS @ garanti . com . tr>
  • Web Proxies
    From: Hiro <hirod @ hutchnet . com . hk>
  • Linux as a Firewall Platform
    From: Jarn Calubiran <920145 @ balut . admu . edu . ph>
  • Re: RADIUS servers
    From: Steve Kennedy <steve @ gbnet . org>
• Sunday 15 December 1996
  • LTS 300 Terminal Server info
    From: andrew @ portal . roc . cqit . qld . edu . au
  • Re: Reverse DNS Map failure while using http-gw
    From: "Donald R. Guillot" <dguill @ communique . net>
  • Re: RE: nslookup via the firewall
    From: Lou Zirko <lzirko @ c2 . net>
• Saturday 14 December 1996
  • RE: nslookup via the firewall
    From: Rick Murphy <rick @ tis . com>
  • Re: Reverse DNS Map failure while using http-gw
    From: Rick Murphy <rick @ tis . com>
  • Firewall Penetration Testing Paper
    From: Reto Haeni <reto @ seas . gwu . edu>
  • Re: NT/95 + usage of IP addresses
    From: Gaddy Gumbao <succesor @ mnl . sequel . net>
  • Re: RADIUS servers
    From: Thomas Hutton <hutton @ opus . sdsc . edu>
  • RE: Delegation, FW-farms
    From: Bill Stout <bill . stout @ hidata . com>
  • Re: Providing Reverse DNS Info Via http-gw
    From: Joachim von Thadden <thadden @ bbaw . de>
  • RE: tcpdump (or something similar) for Win95
    From: Chris Pugrud <ChrisP @ steldyn . com>
  • Re: firewall open when loading policy
    From: lists @ lina . inka . de (Bernd Eckenfels)
  • mail proxy agents
    From: "Craig I. Hagan" <hagan @ cih . com>
• Friday 13 December 1996
  • Re: nslookup via the firewall
    From: sazah @ ibu . sj . nec . com (Sunny Azah)
  • RE: nslookup via the firewall
    From: sazah @ ibu . sj . nec . com (Sunny Azah)
  • RE: nslookup via the firewall
    From: "Hicks, Rick" <RHicks @ hussmann . com>
  • Re: firewall open when loading policy
    From: Todd Graham Lewis <lists @ reflections . mindspring . com>
  • Re: RADIUS servers
    From: William Bulley <web @ merit . edu>
  • APOP and secret storage
    From: Phil Cox <pcc @ stealth . ran . sandia . gov>
  • Re: IPfwadm & Linux
    From: Todd Graham Lewis <lists @ reflections . mindspring . com>
  • Re: firewall open when loading policy
    From: Ryan Russell/SYBASE <Ryan . Russell @ sybase . com>
  • Re: firewall open when loading policy
    From: "Martin C. Walker" <martinw @ epcorp . com>
  • Re: RADIUS servers
    From: Scott Averbach <scott @ shell . flinet . com>
  • Re: SQL*NET (was: Re: How can I route packet by service port?)
    From: George Matovu <George_Matovu @ INS . COM>
  • Re: logging dropped packets fw-1
    From: "Martin C. Walker" <martinw @ epcorp . com>
  • firewall open when loading policy
    From: "Martin C. Walker" <martinw @ epcorp . com>
  • RADIUS servers
    From: Phil Cox <pcc @ stealth . ran . sandia . gov>
  • Operating systems survey
    From: Alejandro Forero <dragon @ anditel . andinet . lat . net>
  • Re: Delegation, FW-farms -Reply
    From: "Samuel T. Baker" <sbaker @ mail . state . tn . us>
  • Re: nslookup via the firewall
    From: "Donald R. Guillot" <dguill @ communique . net>
  • logging dropped packets fw-1
    From: "Martin C. Walker" <martinw @ epcorp . com>
  • fwtk http-gw and cookies
    From: Adam <homer @ pimpz . org>
  • Re: Providing Reverse DNS Info Via http-gw
    From: Robert Rowland <robert @ pei . edu>
  • RSA Laboratories seeks contributions for the "next generation" of PKCS
    From: Ray Sidney <ray @ RSA . COM>
  • Reverse DNS Map failure while using http-gw
    From: robw @ marineterminals . com (Robert Williams)
  • gobbler
    From: Jamshid Abedi <jabedi @ u235 . newyorkview . com>
  • RE: nslookup via the firewall
    From: jsluzewski @ dna . com
  • Re: nslookup via the firewall
    From: "Mike O'Connor" <mjo @ dojo . mi . org>
  • PPTP thru Gauntlet?
    From: Robert Strickler <RStrickler @ thrunet . net>
  • IPfwadm & Linux
    From: Mario Biron <mario @ cardinal . almerco . ca>
  • nslookup via the firewall
    From: "Data Systems Bureau" <lasdsdn @ ix . netcom . com>
  • WEB Spoofing
    From: "R. Kevin McPeake" <kmpeake @ gwr . bausch . nl>
  • Re: SQL*NET (was: Re: How can I route packet by service port?)
    From: oolid @ acqic . org (Joseph L. Moll)
  • Re: SQL*NET (was: Re: How can I route packet by service port?)
    From: Jeff Maddox <jeff . maddox @ ssds . com>
  • Re: Providing Reverse DNS Info Via http-gw
    From: dbrown @ seismo . CSS . GOV (Dan Brown)
  • Re: encryption + backup of my firewall
    From: Dave Roberts <djr @ saa-cons . co . uk>
  • Re: Hackering, Export restrictions
    From: "R. Kevin McPeake" <kmpeake @ gwr . bausch . nl>
  • Proxy Server problem....
    From: "Cihan Subasi (Garanti Tic)" <CihanS @ garanti . com . tr>
  • encryption + backup of my firewall
    From: Danny Cox <dannyc @ gmap . leeds . ac . uk>
  • NT/95 + usage of IP addresses
    From: Oliver Korfmacher <okorf @ netcs . com>
  • Re: SQL*NET (was: Re: How can I route packet by service port?)
    From: Don Pollock - Omnes - Engineering <pollock @ houston . omnes . net>
  • Re: Restricted access.
    From: Don Pollock - Omnes - Engineering <pollock @ houston . omnes . net>
  • Re: Delegation, FW-farms
    From: C Matthew Curtin <cmcurtin @ research . megasoft . com>
  • Re: tunneling over HTTP
    From: "Paul L. Rogers" <rogerspl @ datasync . com>
  • some thru router/some thru firewall
    From: Donald . J . Smith @ cdev . com (Donald J Smith)
  • Re: tunneling over HTTP
    From: Michael Dillon <michael @ memra . com>
  • RE: Is NT really that bad?
    From: Michael Dillon <michael @ memra . com>
  • Re: BoS: Delete permissions on files (Was: RE: Why would someon
    From: Matthew Patton <patton @ unix1 . sysnet . net>
  • Re: tcpdump (or something similar) for Win95
    From: mike @ ptes . com (Mike Bernhardt)
  • Re: tcpdump (or something similar) for Win95
    From: Jamshid Abedi <jabedi @ u235 . newyorkview . com>
• Thursday 12 December 1996
  • Re: Delegation, FW-farms
    From: uhaas @ tsg-usa . com
  • Re: IP forwarding/routing in Win 95
    From: "Leon O'Brien" <leon @ networx . com . au>
  • Re: IP forwarding/routing in Win 95
    From: "Donald R. Guillot" <dguill @ communique . net>
  • Oracle Client/Server Access through Firewall
    From: Ralph Docken <Ralph . Docken @ slchicago . infonet . com>
  • Re: How can I route packet by service port?
    From: Colin Campbell <sgcccdc @ citec . qld . gov . au>
  • Re: ITARII: Son of Stupid
    From: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr @ mail . clark . net>
  • Re: Firewalls FAQ
    From: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr @ mail . clark . net>
  • Re: SQL*NET (was: Re: How can I route packet by service port?)
    From: Les Carleton <les @ tracker . demon . co . uk>
  • Delegation, FW-farms
    From: Bill Stout <bill . stout @ hidata . com>
  • concerns over MS proxy use
    From: "Mike Dilworth" <mjd @ soi . city . ac . uk>
  • Denied packets
    From: sjones @ Aptech . com (Samuel D. Jones)
  • RE: tcpdump (or something similar) for Win95
    From: "Caldwell, Matt COLASC" <caldwm @ msgate . ColumbiaSC . NCR . COM>
  • Proxy capabilities
    From: Bill Stout <bill . stout @ hidata . com>
  • Re: SQL*NET (was: Re: How can I route packet by service port?)
    From: gary flynn <gary @ habanero . jmu . edu>
  • NT Whitepaper, www.hidata.com
    From: Bill Stout <bill . stout @ hidata . com>
  • Re: IP forwarding/routing in Win 95
    From: Ryan Russell/SYBASE <Ryan . Russell @ sybase . com>
  • Re: Providing Reverse DNS Info Via http-gw
    From: robw @ marineterminals . com (Robert Williams)
  • FWTK, Linux
    From: osiris @ pacificnet . net
  • Re: SQL*NET (was: Re: How can I route packet by service port?)
    From: pepa @ www . cz (Josef Pojsl)
  • RE: Sendmail
    From: Greg Whalin <gwhalin @ numerix . com>
  • Re: IP forwarding/routing in Win 95
    From: "Michael S. Fischer" <otterley @ lucinda . digigami . com>
  • tcpdump (or something similar) for Win95
    From: Gary Stanny <stanny @ handset . laa . com>
  • Re: How can I route packet by service port?
    From: Willibald Kraml <kraml @ kpmg . co . at>
  • Re: Unix vs. Windows NT
    From: "Jamie Thain" <jthain @ cat . bbsr . edu>
  • RE: Sendmail
    From: "Allen D. Harpham" <aharpham @ cnweb . com>
  • SQL*NET (was: Re: How can I route packet by service port?)
    From: oolid @ acqic . org (Joseph L. Moll)
  • IP forwarding/routing in Win 95
    From: "Martin C. Walker" <martinw @ epcorp . com>
  • None
    From: msitmi02 . xz46g8 @ eds . com
  • RE: Firewalls FAQ addition
    From: Dana Nowell <DanaNowell @ corsof . com>
  • Re: Firewalls-Digest V5 #668
    From: Adrian Smith <asmith @ mbl . edu>
  • Re: Hackering, Export restrictions
    From: Jyri Kaljundi <jk @ stallion . ee>
  • Re: CORBA and tunnelling over HHTP
    From: Justin Mason <jmason @ iona . com>
  • Re: New export controls to include code signing applications (fwd)
    From: Adam Shostack <adam @ homeport . org>
  • RE: Is NT really that bad?
    From: "Yehuda G. Hahn" <ygh @ cfsnet . com>
  • Re: Hackering, Export restrictions
    From: Dave Roberts <djr @ saa-cons . co . uk>
  • Another great idea (not)
    From: Danny Cox <dannyc @ gmap . leeds . ac . uk>
  • Re: How can I route packet by service port?
    From: Don Pollock - Omnes - Engineering <pollock @ houston . omnes . net>
  • Hacking, Export restrictions
    From: israel . serrano @ solmelia . es
  • Hackering, Export restrictions
    From: israel . serrano @ solmelia . es
  • Restricted access.
    From: israel . serrano @ solmelia . es
  • Re: NT Filrewalls a new list ?
    From: "Daniel J Blander - Sr. Systems Engineer for ACS" <Daniel . Blander @ ACSacs . Com>
  • Re: Unix vs. Windows NT
    From: uhaas @ tsg-usa . com
  • CORBA and tunnelling over HHTP
    From: Michael Richardson <mcr @ sandelman . ottawa . on . ca>
  • Re: Unix vs. Windows NT
    From: geoff @ innov8cs . com (Geoff Crawford)
• Wednesday 11 December 1996
  • Re: Unix vs. Windows NT
    From: Bill Stout <bill . stout @ hidata . com>
  • Users starting "services" that could cause problems.
    From: Bob Beck <beck @ obtuse . com>
  • Cabletron Switching and Vlans was Re: Can You Believe It?
    From: Robert Evans <pedro @ orca . sitesonthe . net>
  • OFF-TOPIC - Re: SUPER OPPORTUNITY!! spam
    From: "Rick Owens" <rowens @ fvcc . cc . mt . us>
  • Re: NT Filrewalls a new list ?
    From: Andy Howard <achowar @ erenj . com>
  • Re: Unix vs. Windows NT
    From: Marc Mosko <marc @ tear . com>
  • Re: Unix vs. Windows NT
    From: Dave Kinchlea <security @ kinch . ark . com>
  • Providing Reverse DNS Info Via http-gw
    From: robw @ marineterminals . com (Robert Williams)
  • Re: SUPER OPPORTUNITY!!
    From: Gary Hanna <gary @ excalib . com>
  • Re: Can You Believe It?
    From: ragnar @ shr . is (Finnbogi Ragnar Ragnarsson)
  • Firewalls FAQ addition
    From: C Matthew Curtin <cmcurtin @ research . megasoft . com>
  • FW: Response from LI Net - spam from paracom @ li . net
    From: "Feeney, Tim" <Tim . Feeney @ FMR . COM>
  • Re: Unix vs. Windows NT
    From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Re: Why would someone want an NT firewall?
    From: Bill Stout <bill . stout @ hidata . com>
  • Firewalls-Digest V5 #666 -Reply
    From: John Szpicki <JSZP44 @ CBOT . COM>
  • tunneling over HTTP
    From: jmason @ iona . com (Justin Mason)
  • Re: NT Filrewalls a new list ?
    From: C Matthew Curtin <cmcurtin @ research . megasoft . com>
  • Re: Unix vs. Windows NT
    From: long-morrow @ CS . YALE . EDU
  • Re: Unix vs. Windows NT
    From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
  • RE: Flood Insurance (was Why would someone want an NT firew
    From: C Matthew Curtin <cmcurtin @ research . megasoft . com>
  • Re: Is NT really that bad?
    From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Re: Unix vs. Windows NT
    From: long-morrow @ CS . YALE . EDU
  • Re: Frame Relay DLCI passthru
    From: wyer @ TeleCheck . com
  • Re: Unix vs. Windows NT
    From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Frame Relay DLCI passthru
    From: Jeff Monder <jeffm @ cvps . com>
  • Re: How can I route packet by service port?
    From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
  • NT Filrewalls a new list ?
    From: "Marriage, Michael" <MIKEM @ xpo . ccn . ac . uk>
  • RE: Is NT really that bad?
    From: Russ <Russ . Cooper @ RC . on . ca>
  • RE: Is NT really that bad?
    From: Todd Graham Lewis <lists @ reflections . mindspring . com>
  • RE: Is NT really that bad?
    From: "Yehuda G. Hahn" <ygh @ cfsnet . com>
  • Re: IP confilict
    From: Shankar <boon @ solnet . dataprep . com . my>
  • RE: Is NT really that bad?
    From: "Yehuda G. Hahn" <ygh @ cfsnet . com>
  • Re: Welcome to firewalls
    From: Brent Chapman <Brent @ GreatCircle . COM>
  • RE: Is NT really that bad?
    From: Todd Graham Lewis <lists @ reflections . mindspring . com>
  • Re: Another IIS Bug
    From: "James D. Wilson" <netsurf @ pixi . com>
  • RE: Is NT really that bad?
    From: "Yehuda G. Hahn" <ygh @ cfsnet . com>
  • Re: Another IIS Bug
    From: "James D. Wilson" <netsurf @ pixi . com>
  • RE: Is NT really that bad?
    From: "Yehuda G. Hahn" <ygh @ cfsnet . com>
  • Re: Insurance policy covering security breach
    From: Robert Bonomi <bonomi @ delta . ece . nwu . edu>
  • Re: IP confilict
    From: Ron DuFresne <dufresne @ parka . winternet . com>
  • Re: Unix vs. Windows NT
    From: Todd Graham Lewis <lists @ reflections . mindspring . com>
  • Re[2]: Insurance policy covering security breach
    From: Darren . Hamilton @ merisel . com
  • Re: SUPER OPPORTUNITY!!
    From: osiris @ pacificnet . net
  • Re: Insurance policy covering security breach
    From: Bob Beck <beck @ obtuse . com>
  • Re: Insurance policy covering security breach
    From: Steven Herod <sherod @ medeserv . com . au>
  • Re: IP confilict
    From: Shankar <boon @ solnet . dataprep . com . my>
  • RE: Another IIS Bug -- FIXED
    From: "R. E. Paret" <rparet @ trumpet . aix . calpoly . edu>
  • RE: phone hookup detection, etc.
    From: "Buff, Kurt" <kurt @ SEATTLE . NYLCARE . com>
  • Re: Unix vs. Windows NT
    From: "Jamie Thain" <jthain @ cat . bbsr . edu>
• Tuesday 10 December 1996
  • Re: How can I route packet by service port?
    From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
  • Re: BoS: Delete permissions on files (Was: RE: Why would someone want an NT firewall?)
    From: Bob Beck <beck @ obtuse . com>
  • SUPER OPPORTUNITY!!
    From: paracom @ li . net
  • Q: Plain TCP packet vs. SYN packet
    From: Brian Stormont <brian_stormont @ corfu . projo . com>
  • Re: How can I route packet by service port?
    From: prasad <prasad @ cinops . xerox . com>
  • Re: How can I route packet by service port?
    From: Chris Lonvick <clonvick @ cisco . com>
  • Re: Is NT really that bad?
    From: Bob Beck <beck @ obtuse . com>
  • Re: Insurance policy covering security breach
    From: Adam Shostack <adam @ homeport . org>
  • Re: How can I route packet by service port?
    From: Jim Wamsley 303-673-8163 <jim @ coltano . stortek . com>
  • phone hookup detection, etc.
    From: "Buff, Kurt" <kurt @ SEATTLE . NYLCARE . com>
  • Re: tacacs+ & Single Use Passwords
    From: woods @ ucar . edu (Greg Woods)
  • Providing Reverse DNS Lookup Info via http-gw
    From: robw @ marineterminals . com (Robert Williams)
  • Re: toolkit license
    From: Rick Murphy <rick @ tis . com>
  • Re: Insurance policy covering security breach
    From: "Margaret H. McMahan" <pmcmahan @ v-one . com>
  • Re: IP confilict
    From: "Donald R. Guillot" <dguill @ communique . net>
  • Re: Insurance policy covering security breach
    From: Adam Shostack <adam @ homeport . org>
  • Re: Delete permissions on files
    From: Dave Sroelov <dsroelov @ pacbell . net>
  • RE: Flood Insurance (was Why would someone want an NT firew
    From: "Duston Suits" <DSUITS @ INS084R1 . STATE . IL . US>
  • Re: How can I route packet by service port?
    From: Ryan Russell/SYBASE <Ryan . Russell @ sybase . com>
  • tacacs+ & Single Use Passwords
    From: myles <myles @ nwnet . net>
  • Re: Modem hacking
    From: Messages_Roswell @ oxy . com
  • [Qs] about dropped packets
    From: "Martin C. Walker" <martinw @ epcorp . com>
  • RE: Delete permissions on files (Was: RE: Why would someone want an NT firewall?) (fwd)
    From: John Cronin <John . Cronin @ oit . gatech . edu>
  • Re: OAI - basic firewall hardware sizing question
    From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
  • RE: Another IIS Bug -- FIXED
    From: Russ <Russ . Cooper @ RC . on . ca>
  • Re: The Unix over NT firewall debate
    From: Pierre-Jules Tremblay <trep @ cim . mcgill . ca>
  • Re: The Unix over NT firewall debate
    From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Re: Is NT really that bad?
    From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Re: Another IIS Bug
    From: "Bruce M." <bkmarsh @ feist . com>
  • Re: Is NT really that bad?
    From: Adam Shostack <adam @ homeport . org>
  • re: Stephen Cobb's Guide to PC and LAN Security
    From: mcnabb @ argus . cu-online . com (Paul McNabb)
  • TIS -- new products -- short
    From: Frederick M Avolio <avolio @ tis . com>
  • Re: Insurance policy covering security breach
    From: "Margaret H. McMahan" <pmcmahan @ v-one . com>
  • Re: IP confilict
    From: Pierre-Jules Tremblay <trep @ cim . mcgill . ca>
  • RE: Is NT really that bad?
    From: "Yehuda G. Hahn" <ygh @ cfsnet . com>
  • Re: Pointers to real-word TIS troubles/joys/configs?
    From: Frederick M Avolio <avolio @ tis . com>
  • Re: toolkit license
    From: proff @ suburbia . net
  • Re: OAI - basic firewall hardware sizing question
    From: C Matthew Curtin <cmcurtin @ research . megasoft . com>
  • Re: Firewalls-Digest V5 #661
    From: Adrian Smith <asmith @ mbl . edu>
  • Re: Is NT really that bad?
    From: Adam Shostack <adam @ homeport . org>
  • Re: Scanning networks for dialups
    From: Ian Miller <firewalls @ scientia . com>
  • Re: OAI - basic firewall hardware sizing question
    From: osiris @ pacificnet . net
  • IP confilict
    From: "Hisham Abdullatif Al-Rumaihi" <rumaihi @ admin . uob . bh>
  • Re: OAI - basic firewall hardware sizing question
    From: osiris @ pacificnet . net
  • Re: Firewalls-Digest V5 #661
    From: Danny Cox <dannyc @ gmap . leeds . ac . uk>
  • IP Conficlit
    From: "Hisham Abdullatif Al-Rumaihi" <rumaihi @ admin . uob . bh>
  • How can I route packet by service port?
    From: DuckSang Yoon <yoondark @ rose . oes . samsung . co . kr>
  • Re: OAI - basic firewall hardware sizing question
    From: blymn @ awadi . com . au (Brett Lymn)
  • test.....
    From: "Cihan Subasi (Garanti Tic)" <NCS1 @ garanti . com . tr>
  • RE: Another IIS Bug
    From: Mark Joseph Edwards <mark @ ntshop . net>
  • RE: Is NT really that bad?
    From: "Yehuda G. Hahn" <ygh @ cfsnet . com>
  • Re: OAI - basic firewall hardware sizing question
    From: C Matthew Curtin <cmcurtin @ research . megasoft . com>
  • Re: Another IIS Bug
    From: "R. E. Paret" <rparet @ trumpet . aix . calpoly . edu>
  • Re: "Fair to Middling" firewalls and "Firewall Wizard"
    From: Bob Beck <beck @ obtuse . com>
  • RE: Another IIS Bug
    From: Mark Joseph Edwards <mark @ ntshop . net>
  • Re: PGP on Solaris x86
    From: jason @ Mastaler . COM (Jason R. Mastaler)
  • Re: Delete permissions on files
    From: Arne Steinkamm <arne @ Steinkamm . COM>
  • The Unix over NT firewall debate
    From: Pierre-Jules Tremblay <trep @ cim . mcgill . ca>
  • Is NT really that bad?
    From: "Yehuda Hahn" <ygh @ mail . netvision . net . il>
  • Another IIS Bug
    From: Mark Joseph Edwards <mark @ ntshop . net>
  • Re: Load sharing
    From: David Helms <david . helms @ checkpoint . com>
  • Pointers to real-word TIS troubles/joys/configs?
    From: "Marco A. Zamora Cunningham" <mzamora @ gfnorte . com . mx>
  • RE: Delete permissions on files
    From: Matthew Thompson <mthomps1 @ kiwitech . co . nz>
• Monday 09 December 1996
  • Re: Scanning networks for dialups
    From: uhaas @ tsg-usa . com
  • Re: Scanning networks for dialups
    From: Steven Herod <sherod @ medeserv . com . au>
  • packet filtering on NT?
    From: "Buff Colchagoff" <buff @ wyegroup . com>
  • Re: toolkit license
    From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
  • Re: Scanning networks for dialups
    From: Rabid Wombat <wombat @ mcfeely . bsfs . org>
  • Re: Scanning networks for dialups
    From: "Kevin J. McMahon" <0003557428 @ mcimail . com>
  • Unix vs. Windows NT
    From: Shaun Fogleman <sfogleman @ cda . com>
  • New Firewall Software?
    From: Eric Woodall <eric_woodall @ oar-wash . com>
  • Firewall software?????
    From: Eric Woodall <eric_woodall @ oar-wash . com>
  • Anyone read Stephen Cobb's NCSA Guide to PC and LAN Security?????
    From: "Michael G. Mucha" <mmucha @ ix . netcom . com>
  • PGP on Solaris x86
    From: sjones @ Aptech . com (Samuel D. Jones)
  • RTP support with a Firewall?
    From: "Frank 'Scruffy' Miller" <frankm @ master . CNA . TEK . COM>
  • Insurance policy covering security breach
    From: gblolmxb @ ibmmail . com
  • None
    From: msitmi02 . xz46g8 @ eds . com
  • None
    From: msitmi02 . xz46g8 @ eds . com
  • Re: Redundant FW-1s in Parallel!?
    From: MSITMI02 . XZ46G8 @ eds . com
  • Re: RAS and Firewalls
    From: MSITMI02 . XZ46G8 @ eds . com
  • Re: Module error.
    From: Haakon Innerdal <haakon @ computec . no>
  • sendmail with firewall
    From: "Carlo Baffe'" <baffe @ lia00 . deis . unibo . it>
  • Re: Can You Believe It?
    From: Ryan Russell/SYBASE <Ryan . Russell @ sybase . com>
  • Re: Tacacs+
    From: woods @ ucar . edu (Greg Woods)
  • OAI - basic firewall hardware sizing question
    From: Doug Greenwald <fsgreen @ dredd . oai . org>
  • Re: Firewalls-Digest V5 #659
    From: evank @ aventail . com
  • Re: Re[2]: Why would someone want an NT firewall?
    From: "Craig I. Hagan" <hagan @ cih . com>
  • Re: "Fair to Middling" firewalls and "Firewall Wizard"
    From: Adam Shostack <adam @ homeport . org>
  • RE: Delete permissions on files (Was: RE: Why would someone want an NT firewall?)
    From: Russ <Russ . Cooper @ RC . on . ca>
  • Re: Oracle SQL/Net
    From: wyer @ TeleCheck . com
  • Re: IRINA is a Hoax (fwd)
    From: David Harley <harley @ icrf . icnet . uk>
  • Re: Scanning networks for dialups
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • Load sharing
    From: Darwin Martinez <darwin_martinez @ INS . COM>
  • Re: toolkit license
    From: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr @ mail . clark . net>
  • Thank you
    From: keithstevens @ acsinc . net (Keith Stevens)
  • Re: Scanning networks for dialups
    From: Ben <ben @ edelweb . fr>
  • RE: Delete permissions on files (Was: RE: Why would someone want an NT firewall?)
    From: Todd Graham Lewis <lists @ reflections . mindspring . com>
  • RE: Delete permissions on files (Was: RE: Why would someone want an NT firewall?)
    From: Russ <Russ . Cooper @ RC . on . ca>
  • Re: Scanning networks for dialups
    From: Mark Allyn 206-860-9454 <allyn @ allyn . com>
  • Welcome to firewalls
    From: Harald Schwanborg <harald @ teledigit . se>
  • Re: Re[2]: Why would someone want an NT firewall?
    From: Ian Miller <firewalls @ scientia . com>
  • Re: Why would someone want a moron security manager?
    From: ArkanoiD <ark @ paranoid . convey . ru>
  • Scanning networks for dialups
    From: Danny Cox <dannyc @ gmap . leeds . ac . uk>
  • Re: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
    From: Craig Brozefsky <cosmo @ ebs . net>
  • Re: Why would someone want an NT firewall?
    From: ArkanoiD <ark @ paranoid . convey . ru>
  • Re: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
    From: Craig Brozefsky <cosmo @ ebs . net>
  • Re: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
    From: Craig Brozefsky <cosmo @ ebs . net>
  • Re: Oracle SQL/Net
    From: pauck @ rs3 . wmd . de (Marco Pauck)
  • Encryptors for Frame Relay
    From: pclow <pclow @ pc . jaring . my>
  • Welcome to firewalls
    From: Majordomo @ GreatCircle . COM
  • Re: IRINA is a Hoax
    From: "Rajeev Kumar" <rxk @ rxk . india . fluent . com>
  • Re: FWTK/Freestone Licensing (Was Yet Another NT Flamefest)
    From: Damien Miller <dmiller @ vitnet . com . sg>
  • Re: Re[2]: Why would someone want an NT firewall?
    From: Todd Graham Lewis <lists @ reflections . mindspring . com>
  • Re: Why would someone want a moron security manager?
    From: Todd Graham Lewis <lists @ reflections . mindspring . com>
  • Delete permissions on files (Was: RE: Why would someone want an NT firewall?)
    From: Todd Graham Lewis <lists @ reflections . mindspring . com>
  • Re: NT firewall debate
    From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
  • Re: Procom Question
    From: Dave Sroelov <dsroelov @ pacbell . net>
  • Re: None
    From: Dave Sroelov <dsroelov @ pacbell . net>
• Sunday 08 December 1996
  • FWTK/Freestone Licensing (Was Yet Another NT Flamefest)
    From: Bob Beck <beck @ obtuse . com>
  • Re: Why would someone want an NT firewall?
    From: Michael Dillon <michael @ memra . com>
  • Re: Oracle SQL/Net
    From: Les Carleton <les @ tracker . demon . co . uk>
  • "Fair to Middling" firewalls and "Firewall Wizard"
    From: Bob Beck <beck @ obtuse . com>
  • Re: Why would someone want an NT firewall?
    From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Re: Why would someone want an NT firewall?
    From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Re: NT firewalls / Eagle
    From: Damien Miller <dmiller @ vitnet . com . sg>
  • BorderWare
    From: CMIS 370-5161 Student 06 <cm370a06 @ nova . umuc . edu>
  • Re: Q: BorderWare
    From: CMIS 370-5161 Student 06 <cm370a06 @ nova . umuc . edu>
  • NT firewall debate
    From: keithstevens @ acsinc . net (Keith Stevens)
  • Re:
    From: "Jerry McKane" <jerrym @ Onramp . NET>
  • RE: Why would someone want an NT firewall?
    From: C Matthew Curtin <cmcurtin @ research . megasoft . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: RAGHAVENDRA M <cs93318 @ rohini>
  • RE: Why would someone want an NT firewall?
    From: Russ <Russ . Cooper @ RC . on . ca>
  • screend
    From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
  • Re: restricting OUTBOUND access
    From: Rudy Amid <rudy @ hcl . com>
  • Re: Why would someone want an NT firewall?
    From: C Matthew Curtin <cmcurtin @ research . megasoft . com>
  • Re: Re[2]: Why would someone want an NT firewall?
    From: blymn @ awadi . com . au (Brett Lymn)
  • Re: Why would someone want an NT firewall?
    From: Michael Dillon <michael @ memra . com>
  • Re: Re[2]: Why would someone want an NT firewall?
    From: "Craig I. Hagan" <hagan @ cih . com>
• Saturday 07 December 1996
  • RE: CROATION RADIO STATION (fwd)
    From: Russ <Russ . Cooper @ RC . on . ca>
  • Re: Test, please ignore
    From: Brent Chapman <Brent @ GreatCircle . COM>
  • Re[2]: Why would someone want an NT firewall?
    From: "Duston Suits" <DSUITS @ INS084R1 . STATE . IL . US>
  • Procom Question
    From: Barney_Bethke @ freddiemac . com (Bethke, Barney)
  • test, please ignore
    From: Darryl John Ong <djong @ vengeance . csd . sgi . com>
  • Test, please ignore
    From: Darryl John Ong <djong @ vengeance . csd . sgi . com>
  • Re: need firewall? (fwd)
    From: Michael Dillon <michael @ memra . com>
  • Obtuse smtpd 1.12 released.
    From: Bob Beck <beck @ obtuse . com>
  • Undeliverable Message
    From: firewalls-owner
  • Livingstone Firewalls
    From: "Justin Abel" <jabel @ compusmart . ab . ca>
  • TEMPEST
    From: "robertp @ hal-pc . org" <robertp @ hal-pc . org>
  • Fwd: CROATION RADIO STATION (fwd)
    From: "Adnan Shubber" <shubber @ hotmail . com>
  • Re: Flood Insurance (was Why would someone want an NT firewall?)
    From: David Bonn <david @ sealabs . com>
  • Re: Why would someone want a moron security manager?
    From: "W.C. Epperson" <epperson @ vak12ed . edu>
  • Re: Breakin through firewall.
    From: Nick Simicich <njs @ scifi . squawk . com>
  • Re: Breakin through firewall.
    From: Adam Shostack <adam @ homeport . org>
  • Re: Flood Insurance (was Why would someone want an NT firewall?)
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • Re: None
    From: "Joseph W. Stroup" <nettech @ crl . com>
  • Re: your mail/Personal/Help
    From: "Joseph W. Stroup" <nettech @ crl . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: Juda Barnes <judab @ netcom . com>
  • Flood Insurance (was Why would someone want an NT firewall?)
    From: Russ <Russ . Cooper @ RC . on . ca>
  • Re: Proxy & illegal IP numbers
    From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
  • RE: Why would someone want an NT firewall?
    From: Russ <Russ . Cooper @ RC . on . ca>
  • Re: Can You Believe It?
    From: Ian Wade <ian @ dowrmain . demon . co . uk>
  • Undeliverable Message
    From: firewalls-owner
  • Undeliverable Message
    From: firewalls-owner
  • Undeliverable Message
    From: firewalls-owner
  • Internet virus: can we drop it now?
    From: harley @ icrf . icnet . uk
  • RE: [Fwd: Caution : Internet Virus] (fwd)
    From: harley @ icrf . icnet . uk
  • Re: Tacacs+
    From: Sameer Anja <sameer @ securities . com>
  • Re: .edu w/ firewalls
    From: jason @ Mastaler . COM (Jason R. Mastaler)
  • Re: Proxy & illegal IP numbers
    From: Todd Graham Lewis <lists @ reflections . mindspring . com>
  • Re: Can You Believe It?
    From: David Marcoux <dmarcoux @ vertx . com>
  • Re: Can You Believe It?
    From: chris @ mcc . com (Chris E Creighton)
  • RE: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
    From: Todd Graham Lewis <lists @ reflections . mindspring . com>
  • Re: Can You Believe It?
    From: Darrell Fuhriman <darrell @ grumblesmurf . net>
  • Re: VERIFY and EXPAND on Mail Thru Firewall
    From: Bob Beck <beck @ obtuse . com>
  • Re: Can You Believe It?
    From: Scott Cokely <Scott . Cokely @ tus . ssi1 . COM>
  • Undeliverable Message
    From: firewalls-owner
• Friday 06 December 1996
  • Re: firewall performance
    From: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr @ mail . clark . net>
  • Re: Why would someone want an NT firewall?
    From: Rich Friedeman <rich . friedeman @ anixter . com>
  • Can You Believe It?
    From: Robert Evans <pedro @ orca . sitesonthe . net>
  • VERIFY and EXPAND on Mail Thru Firewall
    From: Bill Gray <whg @ inel . gov>
  • Re: .edu w/ firewalls
    From: uhaas @ tsg-usa . com
  • take off me from the list
    From: Emes <pisarski @ lodz . pdi . net>
  • Re: None
    From: Dan Simoes <dans @ ans . net>
  • Re: your mail
    From: "R. E. Paret" <rparet @ trumpet . aix . calpoly . edu>
  • Undeliverable Message
    From: firewalls-owner
  • Re: None
    From: Rabid Wombat <wombat @ mcfeely . bsfs . org>
  • Re: NT firewalls / Eagle
    From: "Oswaldo Gomes" <oswaldo @ persocom . com . br>
  • UCLA Short Course on "Establishing an Internet/Intranet Presence"
    From: "Goodin, Bill" <bgoodin @ unex . ucla . edu>
  • ip forwarding?
    From: Peter Yau <pyau @ carfax . ims . advantis . com>
  • Breakin through firewall.
    From: Chris Michael <cm @ rmsbus . com>
  • RE: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
    From: riordan @ math . umn . edu
  • RE: Why would someone want an NT firewal
    From: "Hicks, Rick" <RHicks @ hussmann . com>
  • Get me off of this list!!!!!!!
    From: a3rdeye @ earthlink . net (3rd Eye)
  • Re: Tacacs+
    From: woods @ ucar . edu (Greg Woods)
  • Re: Why would someone want an NT firewall?
    From: "Richard E. Obrecht" <ro03868%itsaxp6 @ cobe . com>
  • Re: Tacacs+
    From: Mark Krause <mkrause @ UU . NET>
  • Re: your mail
    From: jegan @ iai . com (James Egan)
  • Re: Why would someone want an NT firewall?
    From: Adrian Knight <knight @ Harding . edu>
  • Here we go again
    From: Irwin Lazar <lazar @ netevolve . com>
  • Re: why would anyone want an NT firewall
    From: Bill Heiser <bheiser @ individual . com>
  • Re: Vunerabilities in Microsoft's IIS 2.0
    From: patlee @ panix . com@scet . org . uk @ scet . org . uk (patlee @ panix . com@scet.org.uk)
  • Re: Get me off of this list!!!!!!!
    From: judab @ netcom . com@scet.org.uk (judab @ netcom . com)
  • Re: Proxy & illegal IP numbers
    From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
  • Oracle SQL/Net
    From: wyer @ TeleCheck . com
  • Re: Cisco's PIX Firewall
    From: jeromie @ garrison . com@scet . org . uk @ scet . org . uk (jeromie @ garrison . com@scet.org.uk)
  • Re: Serially connected firewalls and FTP
    From: Jim . Egan @ iai . com@scet . org . uk @ scet . org . uk (Jim . Egan @ iai . com@scet.org.uk)
  • None
    From: toon @ cem-bb . e-mail . com@scet.org.uk (toon @ cem-bb . e-mail . com)
  • Re: Why would someone want an NT firewall?
    From: Rick Romkey <pokey @ maddie . atlantic . com>
  • Re: Why would someone want an NT firewall?
    From: Rick Romkey <pokey @ maddie . atlantic . com>
  • Re: Get me off of this list!!!!!!!
    From: Juda Barnes <judab @ netcom . com>
  • Tacacs+
    From: Christopher Tighe <ctighe @ dat . tds . de>
  • Re: Vunerabilities in Microsoft's IIS 2.0
    From: oolid @ acqic . org (Joseph L. Moll)
  • Re: Vunerabilities in Microsoft's IIS 2.0
    From: patlee @ panix . com@scet.org.uk (patlee @ panix . com)
  • Re: Proxy & illegal IP numbers
    From: "David Untiedt" <David @ tns . co . za>
  • Re: Netscape gold ?!
    From: shaver @ neon . ingenia . ca@scet.org.uk (shaver @ neon . ingenia . ca)
  • Re: Why would someone want an NT firewall?
    From: pollock @ houston . omnes . net@scet.org.uk (pollock @ houston . omnes . net)
  • [no subject]
    From: toon @ cem-bb . e-mail . com
  • Re: Cisco's PIX Firewall
    From: jeromie @ garrison . com@scet.org.uk (jeromie @ garrison . com)
  • Re: Serially connected firewalls and FTP
    From: Jim . Egan @ iai . com@scet.org.uk (Jim . Egan @ iai . com)
  • Undeliverable Message
    From: firewalls-owner
  • Undeliverable Message
    From: firewalls-owner
  • Re: FW: virus on the internet
    From: Gene Hardesty <geneh @ surf-line . or . jp>
  • Re: Why would someone want an NT firewall?
    From: C Matthew Curtin <cmcurtin @ research . megasoft . com>
  • Re: Why would someone want an NT firewall?
    From: "Paul M. Cardon" <pmarc @ cmg . fcnbd . com>
  • Re: Why would someone want an NT firewall?
    From: "Daniel J Blander - Sr. Systems Engineer for ACS" <Daniel . Blander @ ACSacs . Com>
  • Re: .edu w/ firewalls
    From: Sameer R Manek <manek @ challenger . atc . fhda . edu>
  • Re: Cisco's PIX Firewall
    From: jeromie @ garrison . com (Jeromie Jackson)
  • Re: Cisco's PIX Firewall
    From: Alfred Huger <ahuger @ secnet . com>
  • Re: Cisco's PIX Firewall
    From: Matthew Howard <mhoward @ cisco . com>
  • Re: Vunerabilities in Microsoft's IIS 2.0
    From: "Leon O'Brien" <leon @ networx . com . au>
  • Re: VPNs
    From: lists @ lina . inka . de (Bernd Eckenfels)
  • Re: Serially connected firewalls and FTP
    From: jegan @ iai . com (James Egan)
  • Firewalls and RAS
    From: MSITMI02 . XZ46G8 @ eds . com
  • Re: Cisco's PIX Firewall
    From: jeromie @ garrison . com (Jeromie Jackson)
  • Re: Why would someone want an NT firewall?
    From: Don Pollock - Omnes - Engineering <pollock @ houston . omnes . net>
  • Re: Vunerabilities in Microsoft's IIS 2.0
    From: Patrick Lee <patlee @ panix . com>
  • Re: Secondary IP address
    From: mdb @ dosmanos . cwiz . com (Martin D. Baldenegro)
  • I need help
    From: "IFOP52" <IFOP52 @ email . lagoven . pdv . com>
  • Re: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
    From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Re: Netscape gold ?!
    From: Mike Shaver <shaver @ neon . ingenia . ca>
  • Re: Cisco's PIX Firewall
    From: Alfred Huger <ahuger @ secnet . com>
  • RE: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
    From: Russ <Russ . Cooper @ RC . on . ca>
  • Undeliverable Message
    From: firewalls-owner
  • Re: IRINA is a Hoax
    From: cwg @ DeepEddy . Com
• Thursday 05 December 1996
  • Re: Cisco's PIX Firewall
    From: jeromie @ garrison . com (Jeromie Jackson)
  • Re: Cisco's PIX Firewall
    From: Matthew Howard <mhoward @ cisco . com>
  • Re: Why would someone want an NT firewall?
    From: dharris @ kcp . com
  • Re: Why would someone want an NT firewall?
    From: Adrian Knight <knight @ Harding . edu>
  • Re: Why would someone want an NT firewall?
    From: cwg @ DeepEddy . Com
  • Q: BorderWare
    From: Christian Kuhtz <kuhtz @ ix . netcom . com>
  • Re: Why would someone want an NT firewall?
    From: "David J. Meltzer" <davem @ iss . net>
  • Vunerabilities in Microsoft's IIS 2.0
    From: oolid @ acqic . org (Joseph L. Moll)
  • Netscape gold ?!
    From: elroy <elroy @ kcsun3 . kcstar . com>
  • Serially connected firewalls and FTP
    From: "Mix, S.R." <MIXSR @ pjm . com>
  • Test ! please delete
    From: shishir @ ftp . com
  • Re: Why would someone want an NT firewall?
    From: gary flynn <gary @ habanero . jmu . edu>
  • Get me off of this list!!!!!!!
    From: "John L. Hamilton" <jlhamilton @ earthlink . net>
  • Re: IRINA is a Hoax
    From: Rabid Wombat <wombat @ mcfeely . bsfs . org>
  • Re: PIX and Gauntlet
    From: Frederick M Avolio <avolio @ tis . com>
  • Re: VPNs
    From: lists @ lina . inka . de (Bernd Eckenfels)
  • Re: Secondary IP address
    From: mdb @ dosmanos . cwiz . com (Martin D. Baldenegro)
  • RE: Firewall performance???
    From: Bevan Thomson <BThomson @ csi . co . nz>
  • Re: PIX and Gauntlet
    From: Terry Bernstein <tbernstein @ sri . com>
  • Re: network access through wall w/tokens
    From: Leonard Miyata <leonard @ geminisecure . com>
  • Re: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
    From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Re: .edu w/ firewalls
    From: gary flynn <gary @ habanero . jmu . edu>
  • RE: Firewalls over NT
    From: "Feeney, Tim" <Tim . Feeney @ FMR . Com>
  • Re: .edu w/ firewalls
    From: "Dr. Stephan L. Moss" <stevem @ POMADM . POMONA . EDU>
  • Re: Secondary IP address
    From: Ken Wilcox <wilcox @ poss . com>
  • Re: Secondary IP address
    From: "Andrew A. Benson" <andrew @ Arbitrade . COM>
  • Re: Cisco's PIX Firewall
    From: jeromie @ garrison . com (Jeromie Jackson)
  • Re: network access through wall w/tokens
    From: Chris Carlson <carlson @ cycon . com>
  • Firewall performance???
    From: Carlos Marlon Coral Ortiz <c-coral @ uniandes . edu . co>
  • Re: PIX and Gauntlet
    From: jeromie @ garrison . com (Jeromie Jackson)
  • Re: Cisco's PIX Firewall
    From: jeromie @ garrison . com (Jeromie Jackson)
  • Re: network access through wall w/tokens
    From: bjm @ ottawa . com (Brian McIntosh)
  • Re: VPNs
    From: Jyri Kaljundi <jk @ stallion . ee>
  • Re: rcp _out_ through firewall, how?
    From: pepa @ www . cz (Josef Pojsl)
  • Why would someone want an NT firewall?
    From: Adrian Knight <knight @ Harding . edu>
  • Secondary IP address
    From: jsluzewski @ dna . com
  • Secondary IP address
    From: jsluzewski @ dna . com
  • Re: need firewall?
    From: Gé Weijers <ge @ progressive-systems . com>
  • Re: PIX and Gauntlet
    From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
  • Re: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
    From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
  • network access through wall w/tokens
    From: raf @ ezunx . com
  • RE: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
    From: Todd Graham Lewis <lists @ reflections . mindspring . com>
  • Question?
    From: weijz @ gdut . edu . cn (Wei Jizhou)
  • Question?
    From: weijz @ gdut . edu . cn (Wei Jizhou)
  • Telnet and AGS + socks/cisco Win95 + MS Netmeeting
    From: "Marriage, Michael" <MIKEM @ xpo . ccn . ac . uk>
  • Undeliverable Message
    From: firewalls-owner
  • rcp _out_ through firewall, how?
    From: Jan Ivar Pladsen <pladsen @ pvv . ntnu . no>
  • VPNs
    From: israel . serrano @ solmelia . es
  • Re: RE: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
    From: bve @ yourtown . com (BVE)
  • I-WAYONE
    From: "JOHN CHIN" <JOHN_CHIN @ compuware . com>
  • Firewall on FTP
    From: Duan Zhenhai <ccdzh @ shoukui . pku . edu . cn>
• Wednesday 04 December 1996
  • Re: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
    From: C Matthew Curtin <cmcurtin @ research . megasoft . com>
  • RE: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
    From: Matthew Thompson <mthomps1 @ kiwitech . co . nz>
  • need firewall?
    From: JEFF BAUMAN <BAUMANJA @ plu . edu>
  • Proxy & illegal IP numbers
    From: B0GDAN @ aol . com
  • Re: Support of Firewalls
    From: "Kimber Cooper" <khcooper @ network-1 . com>
  • Re: get off the list?
    From: mdb @ dosmanos . cwiz . com (Martin D. Baldenegro)
  • RE: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
    From: Russ <Russ . Cooper @ RC . on . ca>
  • Re: get off the list?
    From: Ron DuFresne <dufresne @ parka . winternet . com>
  • Re: NT firewalls / Eagle
    From: Bill Stout <bill . stout @ hidata . com>
  • Re: Cisco's PIX Firewall
    From: jeromie @ garrison . com (Jeromie Jackson)
  • Re: Ip Routing on a SUN
    From: Geoff Mulligan <geoff @ mulligan . com>
  • Re: NT firewalls / Eagle
    From: David Helms <david . helms @ checkpoint . com>
  • Re: Cisco's PIX Firewall
    From: Johnson Wu <jlw @ cisco . com>
  • Re: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
    From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
  • AltaVista Firewall !?
    From: KNNSCC @ scc . se (Klas Nilsson)
  • get off the list?
    From: syed1 @ apple . com (riaz syed)
  • get off the list?
    From: syed1 @ apple . com (riaz syed)
  • Re: Ip Routing on a SUN
    From: "Saqib A. Khan" <s_khan @ litle . net>
  • Re: Ip Routing on a SUN
    From: mdb @ dosmanos . cwiz . com (Martin D. Baldenegro)
  • Re: Ip Routing on a SUN
    From: Les Gondor <les @ trigraph . on . ca>
  • Re: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
    From: Kent Landfield <kent @ landfield . com>
  • Re: WarRoom ISS Survey -- Gembicki's Comments
    From: "F.S. Symington" <FSymington @ gnn . com>
  • Netbios proxy
    From: Wendy Hedgpeth <wendyhe @ microsoft . com>
  • Re: NT firewalls / Eagle
    From: chen @ ibg . ljo . dec . com
  • Re: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
    From: Andy Howard <achowar @ erenj . com>
  • Re: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
    From: bve @ yourtown . com (BVE)
  • Re: Sockd on TIS
    From: Gilbert Soueidy <gsoueidy @ kleline . fr>
  • Re: Sockd on TIS
    From: Frederick M Avolio <avolio @ tis . com>
  • Re: PIX and Gauntlet
    From: Frederick M Avolio <avolio @ tis . com>
  • Re: PIX and Gauntlet
    From: Frederick M Avolio <avolio @ tis . com>
  • Firewalls over NT
    From: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr @ mail . clark . net>
  • Re: Ip Routing on a SUN
    From: Dave Wreski <tel1dvw @ is . ups . com>
  • Re: Ip Routing on a SUN
    From: Dave Wreski <tel1dvw @ is . ups . com>
  • Re: Ip Routing on a SUN
    From: "Andrew A. Benson" <andrew @ Arbitrade . COM>
  • Re: NT firewalls / Eagle
    From: "Oswaldo Gomes" <oswaldo @ persocom . com . br>
  • Re: NT firewalls / Eagle
    From: jegan @ iai . com (James Egan)
  • Re: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
    From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
  • RE: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
    From: rabbi @ www . valuu . net (Rabbi Haim Cassorla)
  • How do I get off the list ?
    From: x1967 @ iktmail . cph . ih . dk
  • Ip Routing on a SUN
    From: Christopher Tighe <ctighe @ dat . tds . de>
  • Ip Routing on a SUN
    From: Christopher Tighe <ctighe @ dat . tds . de>
  • Re: Q: Free NAT packages for FreeBSD ??
    From: Michael Ryan <mike @ NetworX . ie>
  • Re: restricting OUTBOUND access
    From: Bertrum Carroll <bc17684 @ 90 . deere . com>
  • Re: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
    From: "Oswaldo Gomes" <oswaldo @ persocom . com . br>
  • Re: TIS FWTK and Linux 2.0
    From: Todd Graham Lewis <lists @ reflections . mindspring . com>
  • Re: Q: Free NAT packages for FreeBSD ??
    From: Todd Graham Lewis <lists @ reflections . mindspring . com>
  • Re: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
    From: Darren Reed <avalon @ coombs . anu . edu . au>
  • Sockd on TIS
    From: Gilbert Soueidy <gsoueidy @ kleline . fr>
  • TIS FWTK and Linux 2.0
    From: Michael . Kespohl @ svp-consult . com
  • NT firewalls / Eagle
    From: Michael . Kespohl @ svp-consult . com
  • Sockd on TIS
    From: Gilbert Soueidy <gsoueidy @ kleline . fr>
  • IRINA is a Hoax
    From: Gilbert Soueidy <gsoueidy @ kleline . fr>
  • RE: [Fwd: Caution : Internet Virus]
    From: Brian Mitchell <brian @ saturn . net>
  • Q: Free NAT packages for FreeBSD ??
    From: "<<Antony Yen-Ru Lu>>" <antony @ snoopy . ncku . edu . tw>
  • Re: [Fwd: Caution : Internet Virus]
    From: Dave Horsfall <dave @ fgh . oz . au>
  • Re: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
    From: Steven Herod <sherod @ medeserv . com . au>
  • Firewall User Group's
    From: "Ron Malone" <rmalone @ fhlb . net>
  • Re: [Fwd: Caution : Internet Virus]
    From: Darryl Wagoner <darryl @ sai . com>
  • Re: [Fwd: Caution : Internet Virus]
    From: Howard Richter <hbr @ indcomp . atlanta . com>
  • Re: PIX and Gauntlet
    From: "Terry L. Bernstein" <tbernstein @ sri . com>
  • RE: Strange Virus...
    From: Mustapha <musta @ shifra . info . umoncton . ca>
  • PIX and Gauntlet
    From: mike @ ptes . com (Mike Bernhardt)
  • Re: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
    From: "William Beem" <wrbeem @ gate . net>
  • FIREWALL Evaluation
    From: dcarlos @ sunat . gob . pe
  • RE: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
    From: Douglas Cheline <dcheline @ genuity . net>
• Tuesday 03 December 1996
  • Re: restricting OUTBOUND access
    From: "William Beem" <wrbeem @ gate . net>
  • Re: Strange Virus...
    From: Andrea Brenton <abrenton @ hurwitz . com>
  • Re: Strange Virus...
    From: Mark Clayton <markc @ zeus . mentor . co . nz>
  • RE: [Fwd: Caution : Internet Virus]
    From: Frank Beall <fbeall @ borg . mayfield . hp . com>
  • Re: NetBios over IP
    From: Bill Stout <bill . stout @ hidata . com>
  • Unexpected inbound TCP to our port 4144
    From: Jeremy Youngman <jeremy @ youngman . demon . co . uk>
  • RE: [Fwd: Caution : Internet Virus]
    From: Ron DuFresne <dufresne @ parka . winternet . com>
  • Re: Strange Virus...
    From: Jody C Patilla <jcp @ tis . com>
  • NetBios over IP
    From: Peter Yau <pyau @ carfax . ims . advantis . com>
  • RE: restricting OUTBOUND access
    From: nkeenan @ gsionline . com (Mr. Nick Keenan)
  • SNMP and firewalls
    From: Jean-Pierre Morant <jpm @ marben . be>
  • Re: Fwd:Caution : Internet Virus
    From: Giant Tuna <X9O2 @ MUSIC . STLAWU . EDU>
  • NetBios over IP (fwd)
    From: Peter Yau <pyau @ carfax . ims . advantis . com>
  • RE: Strange Virus...
    From: Jamey Kirby <jkirby @ connectnet . com>
  • RE: [Fwd: Caution : Internet Virus]
    From: Darryl Wagoner <darryl @ sai . com>
  • Internet virus yet again
    From: harley @ icrf . icnet . uk
  • Re: IP numbers end
    From: uhaas @ tsg-usa . com
  • NetBios over IP
    From: Peter Yau <pyau @ carfax . ims . advantis . com>
  • [no subject]
    From: root @ bworld . com . ph (Super-User)
  • RE: [Fwd: Caution : Internet Virus]
    From: Jim Wamsley 303-673-8163 <jim @ coltano . stortek . com>
  • Strange Virus...
    From: Warren Moore <warren . moore @ cbis . com>
  • Re: POP3 for TIS firewall
    From: Frederick M Avolio <avolio @ tis . com>
  • WarRoom ISS Survey -- Gembicki's Comments
    From: WarRoom2 @ aol . com
  • Hi, dear guru.
    From: Changmin Park <chang @ cosmos . kaist . ac . kr>
  • Re: POP3 for TIS firewall
    From: Mark Gillett <mgillett @ sghms . ac . uk>
  • RE: [Fwd: Caution : Internet Virus]
    From: Security Mail <security @ vine . net>
  • Outbound Restrictions.
    From: Paul Mason <masonpg @ onto . network . com>
  • Re:
    From: Zayar <zayar @ ksc . net . th>
  • Re: POP3 for TIS firewall
    From: Erik BEAUVALOT <erik @ beauvalot . com>
  • Re: [Fwd: Caution : Internet Virus]
    From: Michael Dillon <michael @ memra . com>
  • Re: restricting OUTBOUND access
    From: Pauline van Winsen - Uniq Professional Services <Pauline . van . Winsen @ uniq . com . au>
  • Re: [Fwd: Caution : Internet Virus]
    From: "James D. Wilson" <netsurf @ pixi . com>
  • Re: restricting OUTBOUND access
    From: "Craig I. Hagan" <hagan @ cih . com>
  • Re: restricting OUTBOUND access
    From: "Rajeev Kumar" <rxk @ rxk . india . fluent . com>
  • POP3 for TIS firewall
    From: Venkata Ramakrishna R <ramu @ duettech . com>
  • RE: [Fwd: Caution : Internet Virus]
    From: Ron DuFresne <dufresne @ parka . winternet . com>
  • Re: [Fwd: Caution : Internet Virus]
    From: Ron DuFresne <dufresne @ parka . winternet . com>
  • Re: Configuring NAT feature in Cisco IOS 11.2
    From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
  • Re: restricting OUTBOUND access
    From: Ming Lu <mlu @ hq . si . net>
  • Configuring NAT feature in Cisco IOS 11.2
    From: Jaime Alberto Botello Cantú <jbotello @ infosel . com . mx>
  • RE: I free Firewall Software for NT.
    From: Russ <Russ . Cooper @ RC . on . ca>
  • Re: restricting OUTBOUND access
    From: "R. E. Paret" <rparet @ trumpet . aix . calpoly . edu>
• Monday 02 December 1996
  • RE: [Fwd: Caution : Internet Virus]
    From: Michael Dillon <michael @ memra . com>
  • Re: restricting OUTBOUND access
    From: nkeenan @ gsionline . com (Nick Keenan)
  • Re: (MSIE3.0) - Re: ActiveX and Risks
    From: Michael Dillon <michael @ memra . com>
  • Cisco's PIX Firewall
    From: "Don S. Chin" <dochin @ cisco . com>
  • Re: SSL
    From: "William Beem" <wrbeem @ gate . net>
  • restricting OUTBOUND access
    From: heiser @ world . std . com (Bill Heiser)
  • RE: IP numbers end
    From: "Osterwald, Paul" <posterwald @ XLConnect . com>
  • RE: Internet Virus HOAX, Part 3x10^5
    From: Mark Joseph Edwards <mark @ ntshop . net>
  • Re: SSL
    From: Leonard Miyata <leonard @ geminisecure . com>
  • Re: Question on Windows NT web behind firewall
    From: FaNgYoU2 <fangyou2 @ panix . com>
  • I free Firewall Software for NT.
    From: "Sergio Untiveros" <suntiver @ mem . gob . pe>
  • Free "Intranet security tips from CSI
    From: "Richard Power" <rpower @ mfi . com>
  • Corporation Security - 90 Day Study
    From: vin @ shore . net (Vin McLellan)
  • WarRoom's Information Systems Security Survey -- http://www.infowar.com
    From: WarRoom2 @ aol . com
  • Re: [Fwd: Caution : Internet Virus]
    From: Stephane Bouché <sb @ omnix . fr . org>, @remcomp.fr
  • Re: Q) What is CIRCUIT GATEWAY(=CIRCUIT LEVEL PROXY)?
    From: marcvh @ aventail . com (Marc VanHeyningen)
  • Re: FW-1 for ISP's
    From: Habeeb Qadri <habeeb @ Synopsys . COM>
  • SSL
    From: Biju John <nbku1 @ ncc . moc . kw>
  • RE: [Fwd: Caution : Internet Virus]
    From: Ming Lu <mlu @ hq . si . net>
  • [no subject]
    From: "Raul Sanchez A." <raul @ aries . dgsca . unam . mx>
  • Re:
    From: "Gary G. Christoph" <ggc @ lanl . gov (Gary G. Christoph)>
  • Re: Cisco's PIX firewall
    From: jeromie @ garrison . com (Jeromie Jackson)
  • 2 questions re:fw-1
    From: "Martin C. Walker" <martinw @ epcorp . com>
  • Re: Redundant FW-1s in Parallel!?
    From: David Helms <david . helms @ checkpoint . com>
  • 2 questions re:fw-1
    From: "Martin C. Walker" <martinw @ epcorp . com>
  • Re: Critical Message
    From: Steve Conner <sconner @ cycon . com>
  • Re: [Fwd: Caution : Internet Virus]
    From: Fade <rparet @ trumpet . aix . calpoly . edu>
  • Irinia
    From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
  • Re: Internet Virus HOAX, Part 3x10^4
    From: "Bryan D. Boyle" <bdboyle @ erenj . com>
  • Re: [Fwd: Caution : Internet Virus]
    From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
  • RE: Firewalls-Digest V5 #642 IRINIA VIRUS
    From: howells @ Welsh-Ofce . gov . uk
  • RE: [Fwd: Caution : Internet Virus] (fwd)
    From: harley @ icrf . icnet . uk
  • RE: [Fwd: Caution : Internet Virus]
    From: Denis Valois <Denis . Valois @ pt . nce . sita . int>
  • Corporation Security - 90 Day Study
    From: vin @ shore . net (Vin McLellan)
  • How do I get off the list ?
    From: weldam @ tce . nl (Ramon Weldam)
  • RE: How to secure a Webpage?
    From: Chris Pugrud <ChrisP @ steldyn . com>
  • [Fwd: Caution : Internet Virus]
    From: "Hisham Khalifa Al Saad" <webmaster @ admin . uob . bh>
  • RE: NAT? Security?
    From: Chris Pugrud <ChrisP @ steldyn . com>
  • RE: Notification: Inbound Mail Failure - Address not found
    From: David Allen <david_a @ dataplex . com . au>
  • Critical Message
    From: Zheng Wenfeng <zhengwf @ gdut . edu . cn>
  • Q) What is CIRCUIT GATEWAY(=CIRCUIT LEVEL PROXY)?
    From: "Young-jin Hong" <wits @ nuri . net>
  • ANNOUNCEMENT: 1997 RSA Data Security Conference
    From: Kurt Stammberger <kurt @ RSA . COM>
  • RE: Machine reboots on starting Firewall-1
    From: eusvcs @ ix . netcom . com (Bill Grover)
• Sunday 01 December 1996
  • Re: Cisco PIX
    From: Matthew Howard <mhoward @ cisco . com>
  • Re: Cisco PIX
    From: Matthew Howard <mhoward @ cisco . com>
  • Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
    From: Douglas Cheline <dcheline @ genuity . net>
  • (MSIE3.0) - Re: ActiveX and Risks
    From: Steven Herod <sherod @ medeserv . com . au>
  • RE: V1 Smart Wall (Gauntlet)
    From: jmperez @ sprynet . com
  • Re: FW-1 Authentication with SecurID
    From: "John H. Kerr" <jhkerr @ ashton . csc . com>

Other Indexes

• Previous month (November 1996)
• Next month (January 1997)
• This month, indexed by thread