Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(December 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Cisco's PIX firewall
From: jeromie @ garrison . com (Jeromie Jackson)
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 96 10:04:05 CST
To: zaka @ tiac . net, lazar @ netevolve . com
Cc: firewalls @ greatcircle . com

> The biggest advantage to the PIX is that you can use a private addressing
> scheme on your network.  This allows you to create a meaningful IP
> addressing scheme.  For example, you can designate the second octet to
> match the OSPF area the address is used in.  (i.e 10.3.0.0 for area 3,
> 10.4.0.0 for area 4 and so on).  Another advantage to private addressing is
> that you never have to worry about renumbering your network due to changing
> ISP's or anything like that.

	Let us not forget, that just about any firewall in the market has the 
ability to allow you to use internal net 10 addressing... This is not  feature
of the box itself.

Jeromie Jackson
Garrison Technologies
jeromie @
 garrison .
 com

Indexed By Date Previous: 2 questions re:fw-1
From: "Martin C. Walker" <martinw @ epcorp . com>
Next: Re:
From: "Gary G. Christoph" <ggc @ lanl . gov (Gary G. Christoph)>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Redundant FW-1s in Parallel!?
From: MSITMI02 . XZ46G8 @ eds . com
Next: Cisco's PIX Firewall
From: "Don S. Chin" <dochin @ cisco . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com