Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(December 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
From: "William Beem" <wrbeem @ gate . net>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 1996 20:24:31 -0500
To: "Douglas Cheline" <dcheline @ genuity . net>, "'Firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM'" <Firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM>

More likely that most folks don't know about the security holes in NT yet.
UNIX holes receive a fair amount of attention, which often causes a furor
and a fix. Microsoft remains rather tight-lipped about holes in Windows NT.


I rather prefer the UNIX approach of knowing what's wrong with it, so I can
make a reasonably intelligent assessment regarding the security of my
servers.  Microsoft seems unwilling to tell me what's wrong with NT.  Maybe
that's why I have more UNIX boxes at work than NT servers.

--William

----------
> From: Douglas Cheline <dcheline @
 genuity .
 net>
> To: 'Firewalls @
 GreatCircle .
 COM'
> Subject: RE: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
> Date: Tuesday, December 03, 1996 7:08 PM
> 
> I guess no-one really wants to touch this subject.  Is it perhaps
> because NT really is "very secure" and we can trust it to do security
> firewalling?  grin;-)
> 
> >Douglas Cheline
> >Senior Consultant Business Solutions
> >
> >G E N U I T Y, Inc.
> >a Bechtel company
> >
> >dcheline @
 genuity .
 net
> http://www.genuity.net
> 
> >----------
> >From: 	Douglas Cheline
> >Sent: 	Sunday, December 01, 1996 3:12 PM
> >To: 	'Firewalls @
 GreatCircle .
 COM'
> >Subject: 	Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
> >
> >The various Firewall vendors that I have spoken to have repeatedly
stated
> >that, eventhough their product does run over NT, running firewalls over
UNIX
> >is much more secure.  The reasoning I get is that NT has some inherent
> >vulnerabilities that cannot be plugged since the code is proprietary and
> >closed.  UNIX on the other hand is standard based and open, plus it has
been
> >on the market much longer and more efforts have been placed in plugging
the
> >holes there.
> >
> >This sounds nice but not very convincing unless some hard facts are
revealed.
> > Can knowledgable members of this forum tell me what those 'holes' in NT
are?
> > and is this a valid argument?
> >
> >disclaimer:  I, myself, prefer UNIX based applications but I don't have
a
> >facts based argument for that preference when it comes to firewalls.
> >
> >Thanks in advance for your responses.
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Douglas Cheline
> >Senior Consultant Business Solutions
> >
> >G E N U I T Y, Inc.
> >a Bechtel company
> >
> >dcheline @
 genuity .
 net
> >http://www.genuity.net
> >


Follow-Ups:
Indexed By Date Previous: FIREWALL Evaluation
From: dcarlos @ sunat . gob . pe
Next: PIX and Gauntlet
From: mike @ ptes . com (Mike Bernhardt)
Indexed By Thread Previous: RE: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
From: Douglas Cheline <dcheline @ genuity . net>
Next: Re: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
From: Steven Herod <sherod @ medeserv . com . au>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com