I don´t think so... If I use a Windows NT with MS Proxy Server, I´m sure
that my network is secure... I can even use IPX on my private LAN... Can
you hack this? ;-)
Oswaldo Gomes
----------
> From: Douglas Cheline <dcheline @
genuity .
net>
> To: 'Firewalls @
GreatCircle .
COM'
> Subject: RE: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
> Date: Tuesday, December 03, 1996 9:08 PM
>
> I guess no-one really wants to touch this subject. Is it perhaps
> because NT really is "very secure" and we can trust it to do security
> firewalling? grin;-)
>
> >Douglas Cheline
> >Senior Consultant Business Solutions
> >
> >G E N U I T Y, Inc.
> >a Bechtel company
> >
> >dcheline @
genuity .
net
> http://www.genuity.net
>
> >----------
> >From: Douglas Cheline
> >Sent: Sunday, December 01, 1996 3:12 PM
> >To: 'Firewalls @
GreatCircle .
COM'
> >Subject: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
> >
> >The various Firewall vendors that I have spoken to have repeatedly
stated
> >that, eventhough their product does run over NT, running firewalls over
UNIX
> >is much more secure. The reasoning I get is that NT has some inherent
> >vulnerabilities that cannot be plugged since the code is proprietary and
> >closed. UNIX on the other hand is standard based and open, plus it has
been
> >on the market much longer and more efforts have been placed in plugging
the
> >holes there.
> >
> >This sounds nice but not very convincing unless some hard facts are
revealed.
> > Can knowledgable members of this forum tell me what those 'holes' in NT
are?
> > and is this a valid argument?
> >
> >disclaimer: I, myself, prefer UNIX based applications but I don't have
a
> >facts based argument for that preference when it comes to firewalls.
> >
> >Thanks in advance for your responses.
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Douglas Cheline
> >Senior Consultant Business Solutions
> >
> >G E N U I T Y, Inc.
> >a Bechtel company
> >
> >dcheline @
genuity .
net
> >http://www.genuity.net
> >
Follow-Ups:
|
|
