Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(December 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: RE: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
From: riordan @ math . umn . edu
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 1996 10:58:47 -0600 (CST)
To: firewalls @ greatcircle . com
Cc: Russ . Cooper @ RC . on . ca
Reply-to: riordan @ math . umn . edu

On Wed, 4 Dec 1996, Russ, making several good points, wrote:

> If you are going to use NT as a Firewall platform, there should be only
> one reason you would do that. You want to integrate your Firewall into
> your existing NT environment (for any of a number of reasons). 

I would generally think of that as an argument against an NT firewall:
You have two doors each of which a bad guy must pass through to get to
your goods.  Do you really want to use the same key for both doors?

Naturally, there are maintenance related security issues but I think
that, in todays market, good Unix based firewalls do not require that
one be a Unix guru in order to manage them  (several will not even
permit access on that level).

-- 
james
riordan @
 math .
 umn .
 edu / http://www.math.umn.edu/~riordan


Follow-Ups:
Indexed By Date Previous: RE: Why would someone want an NT firewal
From: "Hicks, Rick" <RHicks @ hussmann . com>
Next: Breakin through firewall.
From: Chris Michael <cm @ rmsbus . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
Next: RE: Firewalls over NT vs. UNIX
From: Todd Graham Lewis <lists @ reflections . mindspring . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com