On Thu, 2 Jan 1997, Russ wrote:
> Their network diagram describing how the system would be placed has it
> behind a router and in front of the internal LAN. So now someone would
> seem to think that it is highly desirable to dedicate an NT Workstation
> to the task of NAT-only. Me thinks you could probably get a new router
> that supports NAT for less money.
I sincerely agree. A much better choice would have been a 386 running a
non-bloated OS w/ IP Masquerade. There was a description of just such a
setup in this month's SysAdmin magazine for anyone interested.
__
Todd Graham Lewis Linux! Core Engineering
Mindspring Enterprises tlewis @
mindspring .
com (800) 719 4664, x2804
Follow-Ups:
-
Re: NT NAT
From: Darren Reed <avalon @
coombs .
anu .
edu .
au>
References:
-
RE: NT NAT
From: Russ <Russ .
Cooper @
RC .
on .
ca>
|
|
