Firewalls: Re: Re[2]: NT NAT

Firewalls
(January 1997)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: Re[2]: NT NAT
From:	peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
Date:	Sat, 4 Jan 1997 09:43:54 -0600 (CST)
To:	ckn @ findata . se (Carl Karlsson)
Cc:	firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to:	<Pine . SUN . 3 . 93 . 970104093029 . 17183A-100000 @ wintermute . marievik . findata . se> from "Carl Karlsson" at Jan 4, 97 09:40:46 am

> Please correct me if I'm wrong here but I was under the impression that
> the 192.168.x.x-addresses was 'non-routable' or whatever the term is.
> Under what circumstances can an external intruder gain access to my
> internal 192.168.x.x-machines? 

Source routed packets.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Re[2]: NT NAT
From: Ryan Mooney <ryan @ pcslink . com>

References:

Re: Re[2]: NT NAT
From: Carl Karlsson <ckn @ findata . se>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Re: Re[2]: NT NAT From: Carl Karlsson <ckn @ findata . se>
Indexed By Date	Next:	Re: Re[2]: NT NAT From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: Re[2]: NT NAT From: Carl Karlsson <ckn @ findata . se>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: Re[2]: NT NAT From: Ryan Mooney <ryan @ pcslink . com>