Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(January 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Re[2]: NT NAT
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso @ cisco . com>
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 1997 11:17:37 -0500
To: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
Cc: ckn @ findata . se (Carl Karlsson), firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM

At 09:43 AM 1/4/97 -0600, Peter da Silva wrote:

>> Please correct me if I'm wrong here but I was under the impression that
>> the 192.168.x.x-addresses was 'non-routable' or whatever the term is.
>> Under what circumstances can an external intruder gain access to my
>> internal 192.168.x.x-machines? 
>
>Source routed packets.
>

Which are easily stopped.

- paul


--
Paul Ferguson                                           ||        ||
Consulting Engineering                                  ||        ||
Herndon, Virginia   USA                                ||||      ||||
tel: +1.703.397.5938                               ..:||||||:..:||||||:..
e-mail: pferguso @
 cisco .
 com                         c i s c o S y s t e m s


Follow-Ups:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Re[2]: NT NAT
From: peter @ baileynm . com (Peter da Silva)
Next: RE: Huh? I musta misread this!
From: Gene Lee <genel @ inforamp . net>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Re[2]: NT NAT
From: Ryan Mooney <ryan @ pcslink . com>
Next: Re: Re[2]: NT NAT
From: Carl Karlsson <ckn @ findata . se>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com